journal article·2019-10-11

Simple Design for Durable and Clear Self-Cleaning Coatings

Fahad Khan, Muhammad Rabnawaz, Zhao Li, Ajmir Khan, Muhammad Naveed, Mohammad Oliuddin Tuhin, Fazal Rahimb

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 1· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Despite immense potential applications envisioned for self-cleaning surfaces, the existing approaches used for fabricating these surfaces suffer limitations arising from their high cost and complicated fabrication procedures, as well as the lack of mechanical durability and poor optical clarity. Herein we report a simple fabrication design toward omniphobic surfaces involving the application of an epoxy thermoset onto a substrate and the subsequent addition of a self-cleaning component. This approach is environmentally benign, as it utilizes a nonfluorinated self-cleaning component, namely polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). This method is highly versatile, as was demonstrated by its successful use in an epoxy and its composites with a nanoclay, cellulose nanocrystal, and graphene oxide. The self-cleaning-, optical-, and mechanical properties of these coatings are systematically evaluated herein. In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) characterization is performed to gain valuable insight regarding the morphology of PDMS in these epoxy coatings.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Aerogels and thermal insulation · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Packaging, Michigan State University, 448 Wilson Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1223, United States

Department of Chemistry, Hazara University Mansehra, 21300 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Funding

Michigan State University

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aaa094610.1126/science.aaa0946 ↗
2. 10.1002/anie.20150938510.1002/anie.201509385 ↗
3. 10.1021/la000598o10.1021/la000598o ↗
4. 10.1039/b602486f10.1039/b602486f ↗
5. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.13243410.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.132434 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00425005009610.1007/s004250050096 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.114832610.1126/science.1148326 ↗
8. 10.3762/bjnano.2.1910.3762/bjnano.2.19 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature1044710.1038/nature10447 ↗
10. 10.1073/pnas.080487210510.1073/pnas.0804872105 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.120711510.1126/science.1207115 ↗
12. 10.1021/ma300647610.1021/ma3006476 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41563-018-0178-210.1038/s41563-018-0178-2 ↗
14. 10.1021/ma501219h10.1021/ma501219h ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.16610410.1103/PhysRevLett.105.166104 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20100312910.1002/adma.201003129 ↗
17. 10.1021/la103097y10.1021/la103097y ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20110880010.1002/anie.201108800 ↗
19. 10.1021/la402398y10.1021/la402398y ↗
20. 10.1021/ja302903e10.1021/ja302903e ↗
21. 10.1021/la981486o10.1021/la981486o ↗
22. 10.1021/acsapm.8b0010610.1021/acsapm.8b00106 ↗
23. 10.1021/ma020650i10.1021/ma020650i ↗
24. 10.1021/ma000577110.1021/ma0005771 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20150136010.1002/anie.201501360 ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20150489210.1002/anie.201504892 ↗
27. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0295710.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02957 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.11210.1016/j.cej.2016.05.112 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.7b0012610.1021/acsami.7b00126 ↗
30. 10.1002/admi.20160000110.1002/admi.201600001 ↗
31. 10.1039/C8TA11115D10.1039/C8TA11115D ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.012 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.024 ↗
34. 10.1039/c1jm11434d10.1039/c1jm11434d ↗
35. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.10.01110.1016/j.polymer.2013.10.011 ↗
36. 10.1002/pi.454710.1002/pi.4547 ↗
37. 10.1002/app.3962810.1002/app.39628 ↗
38. 10.1021/nn901934u10.1021/nn901934u ↗
39. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.12.01110.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.12.011 ↗
40. 10.1016/0013-4686(95)00440-810.1016/0013-4686(95)00440-8 ↗
41. Brandrup J. · 1989
42. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0126110.1021/acs.macromol.6b01261 ↗