journal article·2020-03-13

Quantity or Quality: Are Self-Healing Polymers and Elastomers Always Tougher with More Hydrogen Bonds?

Sean C. Cummings, Obed J. Dodo, Alexander C. Hull, Borui Zhang, Camryn P. Myers, Jessica L. Sparks, Dominik Konkolewicz

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 2· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Polymer materials containing dynamic bonds have many potential applications including adhesives, elastomers, and coatings with long lifetimes. Interpenetrated networks (IPNs) were studied, where one network had covalent linkers, and the other network had dynamic quadruple-hydrogen-bonded 2-ureido-4[1H]-pyrimidinone (UPy) linkers. IPNs typically have superior mechanical properties to each component network. IPNs had either nonpolar poly(ethyl acrylate) (PEA) or hydrogen-bond-rich poly(2-hydroxyethyl acrylate) (PHEA) matrixes. Although the PHEA materials have more hydrogen bonds, the self-healing, toughness, and fracture energies were poorer than the PEA systems. This suggests that strong and dynamic hydrogen bonds, even at the potential expense of total hydrogen bonds, should be chosen for applications that require toughness such as high-performance coatings, sealants, or elastomers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Miami University, 651 E High Street, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States

Department of Chemical Paper and Biomedical Engineering, Miami University, 650 E High Street, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States

Funding

American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund · Division of Materials Research · Miami University

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C5CS00194C10.1039/C5CS00194C ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0666910.1038/nature06669 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0046210.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00462 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0106110.1021/acs.macromol.6b01061 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20181352510.1002/anie.201813525 ↗
6. 10.1002/marc.20120067510.1002/marc.201200675 ↗
7. 10.1039/C6CS00130K10.1039/C6CS00130K ↗
8. 10.1021/jacs.5b0160110.1021/jacs.5b01601 ↗
9. 10.1039/C4CC03168G10.1039/C4CC03168G ↗
10. 10.1039/C5PY01214G10.1039/C5PY01214G ↗
11. 10.1002/pi.464610.1002/pi.4646 ↗
12. 10.1002/marc.20190003810.1002/marc.201900038 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b0017210.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00172 ↗
14. 10.1039/C9PY01387C10.1039/C9PY01387C ↗
15. 10.1021/mz500235510.1021/mz5002355 ↗
16. 10.1038/nature1140910.1038/nature11409 ↗
17. 10.1021/jo902053t10.1021/jo902053t ↗
18. 10.1126/science.278.5343.160110.1126/science.278.5343.1601 ↗
19. 10.1021/ma021280110.1021/ma0212801 ↗
20. 10.1039/c2cc34701f10.1039/c2cc34701f ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20060226010.1002/adma.200602260 ↗
22. 10.1021/ma200401910.1021/ma2004019 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.5b0193910.1021/acsami.5b01939 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja500205v10.1021/ja500205v ↗
25. 10.1002/pola.2096110.1002/pola.20961 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-018-03203-110.1038/s41467-018-03203-1 ↗
27. 10.1021/ma901668w10.1021/ma901668w ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0163910.1021/acs.biomac.6b01639 ↗
29. 10.1021/ja974112a10.1021/ja974112a ↗
30. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2008.09.00810.1016/j.vibspec.2008.09.008 ↗
31. 10.3389/fchem.2014.0001010.3389/fchem.2014.00010 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0178110.1021/acs.macromol.8b01781 ↗
33. 10.1002/mats.20190000810.1002/mats.201900008 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0076710.1021/acs.macromol.7b00767 ↗
35. 10.1039/c1py00041a10.1039/c1py00041a ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.010 ↗
37. Schaefer R. J. · 2009 · 33.31
38. 10.1126/science.aag018410.1126/science.aag0184 ↗
39. Hibbeler R. C. · 2000
40. 10.1039/C3SM52272E10.1039/C3SM52272E ↗