Electrochemical Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) Membranes Using Polyethylenimine Cross-Linked Polydopamine-Bound Carbon Nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrochemical membranes (ECMs) are an emerging multifunctional separation technology that enables simultaneous contaminant filtration and reaction due to their electrically conductive porous surface coatings. Physical coating stability remains a technical challenge for ECMs, which are largely based on carbonaceous nanomaterials or metallic thin films. In this research, binding chemistry based on polydopamine (PDA) and polyethylenimine (PEI) was developed to prepare physically stable ECMs. Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) ultrafiltration membranes were coated with PEI cross-linked PDA followed by the deposition of carboxyl-functionalized single/double-walled carbon nanotubes (SW/DWCNTs-COOH). Fabricated membranes were characterized for their structural, physicochemical, electrochemical, and separation properties. In a batch electrochemical system, the membranes achieved >99.2% electrochemical reduction of methyl orange (MO) in 120 min. Results revealed that the PDA/PEI intermediate layer can significantly enhance the adhesion between the SW/DWCNTs and the underlying polymer membrane without a substantial reduction (<10%) in water permeability. Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize the permeability and surface electrical conductivity of ECMs by studying the influence of PDA concentration, PEI concentration, and the branched-amine content of PEI in the coating solution. RSM analysis demonstrated two factorial interactions between PDA and PEI concentrations, as well as PEI concentration and PEI branch molecular weight. Our optimization study revealed that the use of a 1:1 ratio of PDA/PEI at low concentrations (∼2 mg/mL) and high PEI branch M w (∼1200) was the ideal preparation condition within the tested design space to maximize both the water permeability (∼895 L/m 2 /h/bar) and electrical conductivity (∼29,761 S/m). This optimized cross-linking chemistry demonstrates the ability to make practical and physically stable ECMs on chemically inert PVDF membranes, expanding the range of membranes that can be used to create electrochemical membranes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L7, Canada
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L7, Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Ministry of Colleges and Universities
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/membranes1012040810.3390/membranes10120408 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.04010.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.040 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11880310.1016/j.memsci.2020.118803 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0055810.1021/acs.accounts.8b00558 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.10.00810.1016/j.seppur.2018.10.008 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12048210.1016/j.seppur.2022.120482 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.06110.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.061 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsestengg.1c0001510.1021/acsestengg.1c00015 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.04110.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.041 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11918110.1016/j.memsci.2021.119181 ↗
11. 10.1166/jnn.2011.443910.1166/jnn.2011.4439 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.06010.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.060 ↗
13. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/23/23570710.1088/0957-4484/20/23/235707 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0347510.1021/acsomega.8b03475 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11885910.1016/j.memsci.2020.118859 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0569110.1021/acs.iecr.8b05691 ↗
17. Larocque, M. J. Conductive Hollow Fiber Membrane Development: Addressing the Scalability Challenges and Performance Limits of Conductive Membrane Fabrication, PhD Thesis; McMaster University, 2022.
18. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.01410.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.014 ↗
19. 10.1021/cr400407a10.1021/cr400407a ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.14062410.1016/j.cej.2022.140624 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12839510.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128395 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.02310.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.023 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12896010.1016/j.cej.2021.128960 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.6b1620610.1021/acsami.6b16206 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0144010.1021/acs.iecr.7b01440 ↗
26. 10.1039/c2jm30695f10.1039/c2jm30695f ↗
27. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.11866010.1016/j.seppur.2021.118660 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0109910.1021/acsomega.8b01099 ↗
29. 10.3390/membranes1005009410.3390/membranes10050094 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym710149710.3390/polym7101497 ↗
31. 10.1126/sciadv.aat745710.1126/sciadv.aat7457 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.02710.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.027 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13160010.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131600 ↗
34. 10.1002/marc.20150002110.1002/marc.201500021 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41467-018-07534-x10.1038/s41467-018-07534-x ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.009 ↗
37. 10.1002/app.4379210.1002/app.43792 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0451210.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04512 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13118410.1016/j.cej.2021.131184 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11833510.1016/j.memsci.2020.118335 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11990110.1016/j.memsci.2021.119901 ↗