Bioinspired Adhesion Promoters for the Metalization of Polyethylene: A Comparison between Polydopamine and Tannic Acid
Source abstract
Abstract
Recently, polydopamine (PDA) was introduced as a bioinspired adhesion promoter for the metalization of plastics to substitute for the environmentally critical chromic acid etching. A more economical and environmentally friendly alternative to PDA with similar chemical functionalities is tannic acid (TA). The present study compares the efficiency of PDA and TA as adhesion promoters for the electroless metalization of polyethylene with nickel. PDA and TA are applied under the same conditions; the effects of pretreating the substrate with oxygen plasma, PDA/TA deposition time, and thermal post-treatment on the film formation are investigated, as well as the influence of accelerating the deposition by addition of metal ions or UV radiation. The chemistry of the film formation is analyzed by surface-sensitive spectroscopic methods, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), a newly developed surface-sensitive combination of multiple reflection attenuated total reflection (MATR) with nonlinear surface-enhanced infrared absorption (SEIRA), and contact angle measurements. The PDA- and TA-coated substrates are metalized; the quality and adhesion of the metal layer are evaluated. Under optimal conditions, both adhesion promoters ensure high metalization quality and a good metal–polymer adhesion strength of about 3.5–4 N/mm 2 but TA requires a more elaborate process, i.e., longer deposition times or deposition accelerated by metal ions and postannealing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Str. 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany
Funding
European Commission
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11095810.1016/j.matdes.2022.110958 ↗
2. ECHA. All News 2017. https://echa.europa.eu/-/sunset-date-for-chromium-vi-compounds-approaches-what-should-downstream-users-do- (accessed 20.02.2024).
3. ECHA. All News 2021. https://echa.europa.eu/-/chromium-trioxide-widely-used-in-plating-and-surface-treatment (accessed 20.02.2024).
4. 10.1365/s35144-014-0525-210.1365/s35144-014-0525-2 ↗
5. Hofinger, J.; Roos, S.; Günther, T.; Maffert, A. Verfahren zur Metallisierung von Kunststoffteilen sowie Lösung. DE 10 2015 201 562 A1, 2016.
6. 10.1021/acsami.7b1986510.1021/acsami.7b19865 ↗
7. 10.1002/ejoc.20190044510.1002/ejoc.201900445 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.114724110.1126/science.1147241 ↗
9. 10.1073/pnas.060555210310.1073/pnas.0605552103 ↗
10. 10.1021/la500800f10.1021/la500800f ↗
11. 10.1166/jbn.2014.188810.1166/jbn.2014.1888 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.1c1957510.1021/acsami.1c19575 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-023-40702-210.1038/s41467-023-40702-2 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20130492210.1002/anie.201304922 ↗
15. 10.1039/C4CC02961E10.1039/C4CC02961E ↗
16. 10.1039/D1TB02073K10.1039/D1TB02073K ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.10457310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104573 ↗
18. Nandini K. E. G. A. · International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science Technology · 2013 · 4 · 999
19. 10.3390/foods1001013710.3390/foods10010137 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.11197210.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111972 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.9b1574010.1021/acsami.9b15740 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20170012710.1002/adfm.201700127 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.123726510.1126/science.1237265 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.5.470910.1103/PhysRevB.5.4709 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00674-810.1016/S0032-3861(03)00674-8 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0227110.1021/acsomega.0c02271 ↗
27. 10.1021/la400587j10.1021/la400587j ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20140370910.1002/adma.201403709 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.10331210.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103312 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0167910.1021/acsomega.2c01679 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10751-009-9947-210.1007/s10751-009-9947-2 ↗