Functionally Gradient Macroporous Polymers: Emulsion Templating Offers Control over Density, Pore Morphology, and Composition
Source abstract
Abstract
Gradient macroporous polymers were produced by polymerization of emulsion templates comprising a continuous monomer phase and an internal aqueous template phase. To produce macroporous polymers with gradient composition, pore size, and foam density, we varied the template formulation, droplet size, and internal phase ratio of emulsion templates continuously and stacked those prior to polymerization. Using the outlined approach, it is possible to vary one property along the resulting macroporous polymer while retaining the other properties. The elastic moduli and crush strengths change along the gradient of the macroporous polymers; their mechanical properties are dominated by those of the weakest layers in the gradient. Macroporous polymers with gradient chemical composition and thus stiffness provide both high impact load and energy adsorption, rendering the gradient foam suitable for impact protective applications. We show that dual-dispensing and simultaneous blending of two different emulsion formulations in various ratios results in a fine, bidirectional change of the template composition, enabling the production of true gradient macroporous polymers with a high degree of design freedom.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Polymer composites and self-healing · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Material Chemistry and Research, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Währinger Strasse 42, 1090 Vienna, Austria
Institute for Vehicle Safety, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 13 VI, 8010 Graz, Austria
Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
Funding
Universität Wien · H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/mame.20120003210.1002/mame.201200032 ↗
2. 10.1002/adem.20170019510.1002/adem.201700195 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma301002610.3390/ma3010026 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20090105210.1002/adfm.200901052 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.12.01110.1016/j.msea.2008.12.011 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.04410.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.044 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.03710.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.037 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.00610.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.006 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0194910.1021/acs.iecr.1c01949 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cep.2022.10915310.1016/j.cep.2022.109153 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7NR08966J10.1039/C7NR08966J ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-020-20498-110.1038/s41467-020-20498-1 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10809210.1016/j.matdes.2019.108092 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ces.2021.11729610.1016/j.ces.2021.117296 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10853-010-4944-z10.1007/s10853-010-4944-z ↗
16. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/10/10400110.1088/0964-1726/18/10/104001 ↗
17. 10.1002/marc.20170016710.1002/marc.201700167 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11771-014-2169-z10.1007/s11771-014-2169-z ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.07810.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.078 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.05510.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.055 ↗
21. 10.1021/bm900008d10.1021/bm900008d ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0246210.1021/acs.iecr.0c02462 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.05.07010.1016/j.matlet.2013.05.070 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10856-009-3972-110.1007/s10856-009-3972-1 ↗
25. 10.1002/macp.1962.02057010510.1002/macp.1962.020570105 ↗
26. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0087510.3389/fbioe.2020.00875 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12338010.1016/j.polymer.2021.123380 ↗
28. 10.1039/c1cc15212b10.1039/c1cc15212b ↗
29. 10.1002/marc.20140073310.1002/marc.201400733 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.01610.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.016 ↗
31. 10.1039/D2TC00136E10.1039/D2TC00136E ↗
32. 10.1038/s41598-021-01720-610.1038/s41598-021-01720-6 ↗
33. EEVC Working Group 17 Report: Improved Test Methods to Evaluate Pedestrian Protection Afforded By Passenger Cars. European Enhanced Vehicle Comittee, 2002.
34. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.07110.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.071 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0065523610.1007/BF00655236 ↗
36. Gibson L. J. · 2014
37. 10.1007/s12540-021-01038-y10.1007/s12540-021-01038-y ↗
38. Yan C. · 2021
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.05310.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.053 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ces.2015.06.04710.1016/j.ces.2015.06.047 ↗
41. 10.1140/epje/i2012-12031-010.1140/epje/i2012-12031-0 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.006 ↗
43. Klug, C.; Feist, F.; Tomasch, E. Testing of Bicycle Helmets for Preadolescents International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI): Lyon, France; 2015136-155.
44. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.01610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.016 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.10431710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104317 ↗