journal article·2024-05-24Open access

Encapsulation of Ammonium Polyphosphate in Lignin Nanocontainers Enhances Dispersion and Flame Retardancy in Polylactic Acid Foams

Stefan Peil, Rakine Mouhoubi, Ruben Streekstra, Hugo Ridard, Lothar Veith, Wael Ali, Thomas Mayer-Gall, Joost Duvigneau, Frederik R. Wurm

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 6· Issue 10

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Ammonium polyphosphate (APP) holds significant potential as a nonhalogenated flame retardant. However, achieving compatibility between polar APP and nonpolar polymer matrices remains challenging. Here, we present a synergistic submicrometer-sized flame retardant system composed of hydrophilic APP encapsulated in lignosulfonate capsules. These lignin nanocontainers (LNCs) are prepared via interfacial cross-linking of lignosulfonate using toluene-2,4-diisocyanate (TDI) in inverse miniemulsion, which is stabilized by polyglycerin polyricinoleate (PGPR), a food additive. Excess isocyanate groups on the surface of the LNCs enable the surface-grafting with hydroxy-functionalized polymers, e.g., poly(lactic acid) (PLA), and enhance the dispersion of APP-loaded LNCs in the PLA matrix. Furthermore, APP-loaded LNCs act as heterogeneous nucleation agents in CO 2 batch foaming. The incorporation of 5–20 wt % LNCs resulted in fine-celled foams, as evidenced by the reduced cell diameters (29 ± 17 μm compared to virgin PLA foams (63 ± 31 μm)) and increased cell density of LNC-loaded PLA foams compared to pristine PLA foams from 2 × 10 7 to 4 × 10 8 cells cm –3 . Notably, the flame retardancy of the LNC-enriched PLA foams was significantly enhanced. The combined carbonization effect of lignin, PGPR, and APP led to an elevated foam char yield, increasing from 0.9 wt % (pristine PLA) to 7.3 wt % (20 wt % LNC-loaded PLA). The experimental limiting oxygen index (LOI) increased from 21% (pristine PLA foams) to 24.5% (20 wt % LNC-loaded PLA foams). UL-94 test proved a V0 rating with only 9 wt % of loaded LNCs. Microcone Calorimeter data further underlines the systematic trend of APP added to the foams with a decreased heat release rate, depending on the amount of FR. Together, our results underline the effectiveness of biobased and biodegradable polymers in lightweight packaging and construction applications with enhanced flame-retardancy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Flame retardant materials and properties · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Sustainable Polymer Chemistry (SPC), Department of Molecules and Materials, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands

Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, Ackermannweg 10, Mainz 55128, Germany

Deutsches Textilforschungszentrum Nord-West (DTNW) gGmbH, Adlerstr.1, 47798 Krefeld, Germany and Institute of Physical Chemistry and Center for Nano Integration (CENIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 2, Essen 45141, Germany

Funding

University of Twente

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41578-021-00407-810.1038/s41578-021-00407-8 ↗
2. Demeuse, M. The Future of Polymer Foams to 2026. https://www.smithers.com/services/market-reports/materials/the-future-of-polymer-foams-to-2025. 2021.
3. GVC Polymer Foam Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Type (Polystyrene, Polyurethane, Polyolefin, Melamine, Phenolic, PVC), By Application, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2022 - 2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/polymer-foam-market/methodology. 2019.
4. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.01.03910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.01.039 ↗
5. David, E. Handbook of polymer foams. Rapra Technology Ltd, 2004, 16.
6. 10.1002/app.5171410.1002/app.51714 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.020 ↗
8. 10.1002/app.4902010.1002/app.49020 ↗
9. 10.3390/polym1106095310.3390/polym11060953 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41598-020-74478-y10.1038/s41598-020-74478-y ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.07810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.078 ↗
12. 10.1039/c2sm25909e10.1039/c2sm25909e ↗
13. 10.1007/s10973-016-5657-610.1007/s10973-016-5657-6 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.00210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11490410.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114904 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.7b1124810.1021/acsami.7b11248 ↗
17. Akbari A. · 2015 · 28310.1007/978-3-642-45229-1_45 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10973-016-5311-310.1007/s10973-016-5311-3 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0054010.1021/acsomega.8b00540 ↗
20. 10.1002/app.4861610.1002/app.48616 ↗
21. ISO, Cellular plastics Determination of horizontal burning characteristics of small specimens subjected to a small flame. International Organization for Standardization: https://www.iso.org/standard/77448.html, 2020; 16.
22. ISO, Plastics Determination of burning behaviour of thin flexible vertical specimens in contact with a small-flame ignition source Amendment 1: Specimens. ISO 9773:1998, International Organization for Standardization: https://www.iso.org/standard/26822.html, 1998; 11.
23. ISO, Plastics Determination of burning behaviour by oxygen index Part 2: Ambient-temperature test. International Organization for Standardization: https://www.iso.org/standard/60786.html, 2017; Vol. ISO 4589–2:2017, 27.
24. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.05.01310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.05.013 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.mser.2020.10060410.1016/j.mser.2020.100604 ↗
26. 10.1002/app.2175810.1002/app.21758 ↗
27. Hull T. R. · 2014 · 11910.1016/B978-0-444-53808-6.00004-4 ↗
28. 10.1515/REVEH.2010.25.4.26110.1515/REVEH.2010.25.4.261 ↗
29. Screening Report - An assessment of whether the use of TCEP, TCPP and TDCP in articles should be restricted; ECHA: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13641/screening_report_tcep_tcpp_td-cp_en.pdf/e0960aa7-f703-499c-24ff-fba627060698, ECHA, 5. April 2018, 2018.
30. 10.1002/adma.20210790510.1002/adma.202107905 ↗
32. 10.1002/pat.109510.1002/pat.1095 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.03.01610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.03.016 ↗
34. 10.1002/pat.177610.1002/pat.1776 ↗
35. 10.1002/pi.447710.1002/pi.4477 ↗
36. 10.1002/pat.144110.1002/pat.1441 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2045910.1002/pc.20459 ↗
38. 10.3390/molecules2422412310.3390/molecules24224123 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.015 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.11152610.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111526 ↗
41. 10.1039/C3RA47971D10.1039/C3RA47971D ↗
42. 10.1007/s10086-018-1701-410.1007/s10086-018-1701-4 ↗
43. 10.3390/ma1207114610.3390/ma12071146 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.10.00310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.10.003 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c0043210.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00432 ↗
46. 10.1021/ie100453a10.1021/ie100453a ↗
47. 10.1039/C4RA06383J10.1039/C4RA06383J ↗
48. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2020.10006110.1016/j.mtbio.2020.100061 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.cis.2019.10207710.1016/j.cis.2019.102077 ↗
50. 10.1002/pat.113010.1002/pat.1130 ↗