journal article·2023-04-14Open access

Antimicrobial Cost-Effective Transparent Hydrogel Films from Renewable Gum Karaya/Chitosan Polysaccharides for Modern Wound Dressings

Eva Drápalová, Lenka Michlovská, Hana Poštulková, Ivana Chamradová, Břetislav Lipový, Jakub Holoubek, Lukáš Vacek, Filip Růžička, Markéta Hanslianová, Táňa Svobodová, Eva Černá, Barbara Hrdličková, Lucy Vojtová

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 5· Issue 4

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The newest trends in wound healing management and the development of the next generation of dressings are pointing toward natural polymeric materials with important beneficial properties such as antimicrobial effects, renewability, easier process of preparation, and biological activity. Here, we present the preparation and in vitro evaluation of a unique biopolymeric blend composed of natural polymers based on the positively charged polysaccharide chitosan and negatively charged gum karaya. A plate lysis assay of gum karaya and chitosan solution mixtures proved the synergistic antimicrobial effect against specific strains of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and yeast. This polymeric mixture was used for hydrogel film preparation and determination of the composition effect on physical properties (swelling behavior in different solvents, pH, diffusion mechanism, hydrolytic stability, mechanical and optical properties). While the pure gum karaya with poly(vinyl alcohol) exhibited the highest hydrolytic degradation (68%), the mixture of poly(vinyl alcohol) and gum karaya with chitosan (in the 25:75 ratio) exhibited the lowest degradation value (41%) due to the strong physical interactions. Cytotoxicity tests performed with hydrogel extracts using two different in vitro models, adherent fibroblasts (NIH3T3) and non-adherent suspension B-lymphocytes (BaF3), exhibited excellent biocompatibility and no cytotoxicity. As expected, the antimicrobial activity of 3-day film extracts showed a significantly improved antimicrobial effect of mixtures involving a chitosan biopolymer. The physical and biological properties of prepared biopolymer-based hydrogels meet the requirements of modern wound dressings.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 656/123, Brno 612 00, Czech Republic

Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Institution shared with University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic

Department of Microbiology, St. Anne’s University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, Brno 602 00, Czech Republic

Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic

Enantis, Kamenice 34, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictv? Cesk? Republiky · Vysok? Ucen? Technick? v Brne

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1053/j.ctep.2004.08.00610.1053/j.ctep.2004.08.006 ↗
2. 10.1002/14651858.CD002106.pub410.1002/14651858.CD002106.pub4 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.04.01010.1016/j.jsps.2019.04.010 ↗
4. 10.1186/s40824-016-0063-510.1186/s40824-016-0063-5 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-3-030-05399-4_510.1007/978-3-030-05399-4_5 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.18610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.186 ↗
7. 10.1007/s40204-018-0083-410.1007/s40204-018-0083-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12691110.1016/j.matlet.2019.126911 ↗
9. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-456-7.00010-610.1016/B978-1-78242-456-7.00010-6 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.07.01310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.07.013 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.07.00510.1016/j.arabjc.2014.07.005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jare.2017.01.00510.1016/j.jare.2017.01.005 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1112209310.3390/polym11122093 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.02110.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.021 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.03.08610.1016/j.nimb.2008.03.086 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.03310.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.033 ↗
17. 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2004.02916.x10.1046/j.1445-2197.2004.02916.x ↗
18. 10.3390/ma1213217610.3390/ma12132176 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.04.06410.1016/j.carbpol.2015.04.064 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.01.01110.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.01.011 ↗
21. 10.1155/2015/75072610.1155/2015/750726 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11768710.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117687 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-019-10290-110.1038/s41467-019-10290-1 ↗
24. 10.3390/ijms2124965610.3390/ijms21249656 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11578410.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115784 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.08410.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.084 ↗
27. 10.1097/CCO.0b013e328011a25f10.1097/CCO.0b013e328011a25f ↗
28. Lipový B. · Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol · 2018 · 67 · 166
29. 10.3390/nano1010197110.3390/nano10101971 ↗
30. 10.1517/1742524100360225910.1517/17425241003602259 ↗
31. 10.3390/biomedicines906059010.3390/biomedicines9060590 ↗
32. 10.1007/978-981-10-6784-6_610.1007/978-981-10-6784-6_6 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0105810.1021/acs.biomac.7b01058 ↗
34. 10.1590/S0104-1428200900030001310.1590/S0104-14282009000300013 ↗
35. 10.3390/polym1306090410.3390/polym13060904 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41598-022-12150-310.1038/s41598-022-12150-3 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.12857110.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128571 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10754710.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107547 ↗
39. 10.1007/s11356-016-6699-910.1007/s11356-016-6699-9 ↗
40. 10.1021/bm070014y10.1021/bm070014y ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.06.00710.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.06.007 ↗
42. Dash S. · Acta Poloniae Pharmaceut. · 2010 · 67 · 217
43. Zarzycki R. · Ecol. Chem. Eng. S · 2010 · 17 · 118
44. 10.5772/6179210.5772/61792 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.burns.2014.10.02310.1016/j.burns.2014.10.023 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00685-010.1016/S0032-3861(99)00685-0 ↗
47. 10.3390/md1304181910.3390/md13041819 ↗
48. 10.7763/IJCEA.2010.V1.6110.7763/IJCEA.2010.V1.61 ↗
49. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.990.22010.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.990.220 ↗
50. 10.2147/CWCMR.S6031710.2147/CWCMR.S60317 ↗
51. 10.1016/0169-409X(93)90025-Y10.1016/0169-409X(93)90025-Y ↗
52. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10148910.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101489 ↗
53. 10.3390/polym1302025110.3390/polym13020251 ↗
54. 10.1039/D1TA00112D10.1039/D1TA00112D ↗
55. 10.3390/ma1322527310.3390/ma13225273 ↗
56. Mutar M. A. · Int. J. Res. Studies Biosci. · 2015 · 3 · 1