journal article·2023-01-13Open access

Effects of Feed Solution pH on Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Nanofiltration Membranes

Moritz A. Junker, Jurjen A. Regenspurg, Cristobal I. Valdes Rivera, Esra te Brinke, Wiebe M. de Vos

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 5· Issue 1

Abstract

Over the past decade polyelectrolyte multilayer (PEM)-based membranes have gained a lot of interest in the field of nanofiltration (NF) as an alternative to conventional polyamide-based thin film composite membranes. With great variety in fabrication conditions, these membranes can achieve superior properties such as high chemical resistance and excellent filtration performance. Some of the most common polyelectrolytes used to prepare NF membranes are weak, meaning that their charge density depends on pH within the normal window of operation relevant for potential applications (pH 0-14). This might cause a dependency of membrane properties on the pH of filtered solutions, as indicated by other applications of PEMs. In this work, the susceptibility of membrane structure (swelling and surface charge) and performance (permeability, molecular weight cutoff, and salt retention) toward the pH of the filtration solution was studied for four fundamentally different PEM systems: poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDADMAC)/poly(sodium-4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS) (strong/strong), poly(allylamine hydrochloric acid) (PAH)/poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) (weak/weak), and PAH/PSS (weak/strong) and PAH/PSS+PAH/PAA (asymmetric). Slight variations in structure and performance of the PDADMAC/PSS-based membranes were observed. On the contrary, structure and performance of PAH/PAA-based membranes are very susceptible to feed solution pH. A continuous change in charge density with variation in pH significantly affects salt retention. An increased swelling at pH 9 translates to variation in permeability and molecular weight cutoff of the membrane. The susceptibility of PAH/PSS-based membranes to pH is less pronounced compared to the PAH/PAA-based membranes since only one of the polyelectrolytes involved is weak. No structural changes were observed, indicating additional specific interactions between the polyelectrolytes other than electrostatic forces that stabilize film structure. A combination of the PAH/PSS and PAH/PAA system (8 + 2 bilayers) also displays a clear dependency of both membrane structure and performance on solution pH, where PAH/PSS is dominating due to a higher bilayer number.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Membrane Science and Technology, University of Twente, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AEEnschede, The Netherlands

International Institute for Infrastructural, Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering─IHE, P.O. Box 3015, 2601 DADelft, The Netherlands

Funding

H2020 European Research Council · Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek · NX Filtration · Oasen (Gouda, The Netherlands)

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00172-610.1016/S0011-9164(98)00172-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.05810.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.058 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00308-110.1016/S0269-7491(02)00308-1 ↗
4. Baker, R. W. Membrane technology and applications; John Wiley & Sons, 2012; pp 222–224.
5. 10.1021/es803146r10.1021/es803146r ↗
6. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.02410.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.024 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11827710.1016/j.memsci.2020.118277 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20040076010.1002/adma.200400760 ↗
9. 10.2147/NSA.S570510.2147/NSA.S5705 ↗
10. 10.1039/C3PY01262J10.1039/C3PY01262J ↗
11. 10.1039/D0TA07154D10.1039/D0TA07154D ↗
12. 10.1016/0040-6090(92)90417-A10.1016/0040-6090(92)90417-A ↗
13. 10.1016/0095-8522(66)90018-310.1016/0095-8522(66)90018-3 ↗
14. 10.1021/la020926f10.1021/la020926f ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.10047110.1016/j.apmt.2019.100471 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.03510.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.035 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsestengg.0c0016010.1021/acsestengg.0c00160 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11853210.1016/j.memsci.2020.118532 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.08.04010.1016/j.seppur.2015.08.040 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00757-910.1016/S0011-9164(02)00757-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.00910.1016/j.desal.2009.02.009 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.desal.2005.05.03110.1016/j.desal.2005.05.031 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.03110.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.031 ↗
24. 10.1021/ma100748910.1021/ma1007489 ↗
25. 10.1021/ma048596o10.1021/ma048596o ↗
26. 10.1021/ma991645q10.1021/ma991645q ↗
27. 10.1021/ma980036010.1021/ma9800360 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.05.02710.1016/j.memsci.2017.05.027 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)00956-610.1016/S0927-7757(01)00956-6 ↗
30. 10.1021/ma049445o10.1021/ma049445o ↗
31. 10.1021/la010873m10.1021/la010873m ↗
32. 10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.01010.1016/j.addr.2011.03.010 ↗
33. 10.1021/ma001720t10.1021/ma001720t ↗
34. 10.1021/ma025837o10.1021/ma025837o ↗
35. 10.1021/ma047667g10.1021/ma047667g ↗
36. 10.1016/0376-7388(93)85220-Q10.1016/0376-7388(93)85220-Q ↗
37. 10.1002/marc.20040033110.1002/marc.200400331 ↗
38. 10.1021/la000075g10.1021/la000075g ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0247810.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02478 ↗
40. 10.1002/admi.20160028210.1002/admi.201600282 ↗
41. 10.1021/la049598510.1021/la0495985 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cocis.2005.05.00110.1016/j.cocis.2005.05.001 ↗
43. 10.1021/cm049920x10.1021/cm049920x ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cis.2020.10220010.1016/j.cis.2020.102200 ↗
45. 10.1021/ma049593e10.1021/ma049593e ↗
46. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11857010.1016/j.memsci.2020.118570 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.03.05410.1016/j.memsci.2005.03.054 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.02910.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.029 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.01.03410.1016/j.memsci.2006.01.034 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.12.05910.1016/j.memsci.2007.12.059 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.memsci.2003.11.00310.1016/j.memsci.2003.11.003 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.02510.1016/j.desal.2010.06.025 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.04610.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.046 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.09.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.09.004 ↗
55. 10.1002/sia.619110.1002/sia.6191 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0082610.1021/acsapm.1c00826 ↗
57. 10.1021/cm049920x10.1021/cm049920x ↗
58. 10.1021/la026500i10.1021/la026500i ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0190910.1021/acs.macromol.0c01909 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11804510.1016/j.memsci.2020.118045 ↗
61. 10.1016/S1383-5866(98)00050-110.1016/S1383-5866(98)00050-1 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsestengg.0c0016010.1021/acsestengg.0c00160 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.01.00210.1016/j.cocis.2010.01.002 ↗
64. 10.1021/la990650k10.1021/la990650k ↗
65. 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00535-410.1016/S0376-7388(00)00535-4 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.cis.2008.01.00410.1016/j.cis.2008.01.004 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.ces.2013.09.04210.1016/j.ces.2013.09.042 ↗
68. Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical methods: Fundamentals and applications, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2001; pp 137–140.
69. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.03110.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.031 ↗
70. 10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00060-410.1016/S0376-7388(97)00060-4 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.02510.1016/j.watres.2018.04.025 ↗