journal article·2022-01-14Open access

Effect of Polymer Topology on Microstructure, Segmental Dynamics, and Ionic Conductivity in PEO/PMMA-Based Solid Polymer Electrolytes

Recep Bakar, Saeid Darvishi, Tianyu Li, Mertcan Han, Umut Aydemir, Sedat Nizamoglu, Kunlun Hong, Erkan Senses

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 4· Issue 1

Abstract

Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)-based solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) have attracted much interest due to their high ionic conductivity resulting from inherently fast segmental dynamics and high salt solubility, yet they lack mechanical stability in their neat form. Blending PEO with another rigid, or high glass transition temperature, polymer is a versatile way to improve the mechanical stability; however, the ionic conductivity is strongly reduced due to slower segmental dynamics of highly interpenetrating linear polymer chains. In this work, we used model PEO/PMMA blend systems prepared with various well-defined PEO architectures (linear, stars, hyperbranched, and bottlebrushes) doped with lithium bis(trifluoromethane-sulfonyl)-imide (LiTFSI) and investigated, for the first time, the role of macromolecular architecture of PEO on crystallization, segmental dynamics, and ionic conductivity in the blends and electrolytes. The results suggest that room-temperature miscibility of these polymers can be dramatically extended by using nonlinear PEO in the blends instead of linear chains, which crystallize above 35 wt %. The broadband dielectric spectroscopy results revealed enhanced decoupling of PMMA and PEO segmental dynamics in compact branched architectures, which helps to achieve faster segmental motion of star PEO in glassy PMMA. This manifests as nearly three-fold higher ionic conductivity in these nonlinear blends compared to the conventional linear PEO/PMMA system. Regardless of the PEO architectures, the temperature dependence of ionic conductivity blends with PMMA and LiTFSI is well defined using the Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann mechanism, suggesting that ion transport is mainly affected by the segmental motion. The activation energy values decrease with the increasing ionic conductivity. Overall, our results show that macromolecular architecture can be a tool to decouple segmental dynamics and ion mobility to rationally design SPEs with improved performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Conducting polymers and applications · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Material Science and Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United States

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey

Department of Chemistry, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey

Koç University Boron and Advanced Materials Application and Research Center, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey

Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States

Funding

Oak Ridge National Laboratory · Ko?? ??niversitesi

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1049/pel2.1201310.1049/pel2.12013 ↗
2. 10.1063/5.003753410.1063/5.0037534 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20200881810.1002/adfm.202008818 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20200820810.1002/adfm.202008208 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20200071310.1002/adma.202000713 ↗
6. 10.3390/polym1301001110.3390/polym13010011 ↗
7. 10.1007/s13204-011-0044-x10.1007/s13204-011-0044-x ↗
8. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.10122010.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.101220 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22870810.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228708 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.00910.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.009 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0239410.1021/acs.macromol.7b02394 ↗
12. 10.1039/c6mh00218h10.1039/c6mh00218h ↗
13. 10.1039/c4ta00494a10.1039/c4ta00494a ↗
14. 10.1039/c7ra01601h10.1039/c7ra01601h ↗
15. 10.1021/jp211195610.1021/jp2111956 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0015910.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00159 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0409810.1021/acsomega.9b04098 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.09.02010.1016/j.ssi.2012.09.020 ↗
19. 10.1186/s40580-020-00252-510.1186/s40580-020-00252-5 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0452110.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04521 ↗
21. 10.1039/d0se00013b10.1039/d0se00013b ↗
22. 10.1039/c9me00038k10.1039/c9me00038k ↗
23. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-12170510.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121705 ↗
24. 10.3390/polym1203072410.3390/polym12030724 ↗
25. 10.1021/ma00175a02810.1021/ma00175a028 ↗
26. 10.1016/0032-3861(89)90003-710.1016/0032-3861(89)90003-7 ↗
27. 10.1021/ma049281b10.1021/ma049281b ↗
28. 10.1021/ma991381810.1021/ma9913818 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0251410.1021/acsnano.8b02514 ↗
30. 10.1021/ma992170610.1021/ma9921706 ↗
31. 10.1002/polb.2073510.1002/polb.20735 ↗
32. 10.1122/1.275107610.1122/1.2751076 ↗
33. 10.1039/c6sm01622g10.1039/c6sm01622g ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0184310.1021/acs.macromol.7b01843 ↗
35. 10.1021/ma982404610.1021/ma9824046 ↗
36. 10.1021/cm103696g10.1021/cm103696g ↗
37. 10.1039/d1cp00194a10.1039/d1cp00194a ↗
38. Shojaatal Hosseini M. · 2016
39. 10.1038/s41598-020-61373-910.1038/s41598-020-61373-9 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.493148310.1063/1.4931483 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.490608510.1063/1.4906085 ↗
42. 10.1016/s0167-2738(97)00117-310.1016/s0167-2738(97)00117-3 ↗
43. 10.1039/c5ta03471j10.1039/c5ta03471j ↗
44. 10.1021/ma00158a03610.1021/ma00158a036 ↗
45. Alfonso G. C. · 1986 · 13210.1007/978-94-009-4185-4_16 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11581-019-02842-810.1007/s11581-019-02842-8 ↗
47. 10.1016/0032-3861(95)93916-a10.1016/0032-3861(95)93916-a ↗
48. 10.1021/ma500215f10.1021/ma500215f ↗
49. 10.1021/ma702429r10.1021/ma702429r ↗
50. 10.1021/ma071487010.1021/ma0714870 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.161596310.1063/1.1615963 ↗
52. 10.1021/ma702299n10.1021/ma702299n ↗
53. 10.1002/polb.2161610.1002/polb.21616 ↗
54. 10.1021/ma021634o10.1021/ma021634o ↗
55. 10.1063/1.47737610.1063/1.477376 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.03310.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.033 ↗
57. 10.1002/polb.2059210.1002/polb.20592 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.479461810.1063/1.4794618 ↗
59. 10.1021/ma049735510.1021/ma0497355 ↗
60. 10.1002/mrc.463610.1002/mrc.4636 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jsamd.2018.01.00210.1016/j.jsamd.2018.01.002 ↗
62. 10.1351/pac20088006123910.1351/pac200880061239 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.218663810.1063/1.2186638 ↗
64. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0411710.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04117 ↗
65. 10.1016/s0013-4686(97)10075-510.1016/s0013-4686(97)10075-5 ↗
66. 10.1016/0032-3861(95)96855-310.1016/0032-3861(95)96855-3 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.10286110.1016/j.rinp.2019.102861 ↗
68. 10.1039/d0cp01130d10.1039/d0cp01130d ↗