journal article·2022-04-08Open access

Mechanically and Thermally Enhanced 3D-Printed Photocurable Polymer Nanocomposites Containing Functionalized Chitin Nanowhiskers by Stereolithography

Reymark D. Maalihan, Qiyi Chen, Hiroshi Tamura, Joseph Rey H. Sta. Agueda, Bryan B. Pajarito, Eugene B. Caldona, Rigoberto C. Advincula

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 4· Issue 4

Abstract

Additive manufacturing, or simply 3D printing (3DP), where objects are built through layer-wise material deposition, has gained significant academic and industrial attention as a result of the development of advanced and functional materials requiring rapid, customized, and flexible solutions. In the context of green manufacturing, diversifying environmentally and economically sustainable material portfolios is an essential endeavor for the success of 3DP technology that uses widely available, highly valuable, and renewable materials. In this study, we used stereolithography (SLA) for processing methacrylate-based photocurable resins containing crab shell-derived chitin nanowhiskers (CNWs), which are surface-functionalized by reactive acrylate groups. Results from full spectral, thermal, structural, and topological analyses corroborate not only the surface functionalization of CNWs but also indicate the presence of these photocurable CNW (pCNW) fillers in the 3D-printed nanocomposites. Owing to the strong interfacial bond induced by the physical and chemical crosslinking between the pCNW and methacrylate (MA) polymer matrix, the internally formulated nanocomposites displayed enhanced thermomechanical properties (e.g., storage modulus and glass transition temperature) compared to those of commercially available pure SLA resins. For instance, the inclusion of 0.5 wt % pCNW improved the tensile strength and stiffness to up to 78 and 71%, respectively, without compromising the toughness and ductility of the printed material. Accordingly, this result also evidences the compatibility between the filler and resin materials. Consequently, the formation of a crosslinked network in the nanocomposite structure results in a higher thermal stability and activation energy (i.e., up to ∼79%) for all the hybrid materials than the pristine MA. The high-resolution SLA print features, dimensional accuracy, and enhanced mechanical performance of our microstructure-forming functionalized chitin-based nanocomposites make them promising materials for a wide range of robust and high-performance industrial applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Material Testing and Calibration Center and Chemical Engineering Department, Batangas State University, Batangas City 4200, Philippines

Department of Macromolecular Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States

Department of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Kansai University, 3 Chome-3-35 Yamatecho, Suita, Osaka 564-8680, Japan

Department of Chemical Engineering and Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management, De La Salle University, Manila 1004, Philippines

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and Institute for Advanced Materials and Manufacturing, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United States

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Philippines

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/15583724.2016.124710210.1080/15583724.2016.1247102 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.01010.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.010 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10063810.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100638 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.10048610.1016/j.apmt.2019.100486 ↗
6. 10.1557/mrc.2020.5710.1557/mrc.2020.57 ↗
7. 10.1002/mame.20160055310.1002/mame.201600553 ↗
8. 10.1557/s43579-021-00069-110.1557/s43579-021-00069-1 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10204310.1016/j.addma.2021.102043 ↗
10. 10.1557/s43579-021-00038-810.1557/s43579-021-00038-8 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.6b1617410.1021/acsami.6b16174 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.0c1370210.1021/acsami.0c13702 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.9b1207110.1021/acsami.9b12071 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0101110.1021/acsapm.0c01011 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.005 ↗
16. 10.1021/am301321v10.1021/am301321v ↗
17. 10.1007/s10570-019-02353-910.1007/s10570-019-02353-9 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.7b0922310.1021/acsami.7b09223 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10570-018-1888-y10.1007/s10570-018-1888-y ↗
20. 10.1002/app.4916410.1002/app.49164 ↗
21. 10.15376/biores.14.2.3701-371610.15376/biores.14.2.3701-3716 ↗
22. 10.1021/ma002049v10.1021/ma002049v ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.06310.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.063 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.18110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.181 ↗
25. 10.1039/C9RA00769E10.1039/C9RA00769E ↗
26. 10.1038/pj.2012.1110.1038/pj.2012.11 ↗
27. 10.1021/bm201564a10.1021/bm201564a ↗
28. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.04.03510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.04.035 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.10.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2018.10.028 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.06910.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.069 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.05910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.059 ↗
32. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0041810.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00418 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.02510.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.025 ↗
34. 10.1002/APP.3980910.1002/APP.39809 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.06.01510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.06.015 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.09610.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.096 ↗
37. Hull, C. Apparatus for Production of Three–Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography. US Pat. 4575330 1-16. 1986.
38. 10.1002/mame.20200044810.1002/mame.202000448 ↗
39. 10.1039/c1gc15321h10.1039/c1gc15321h ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.7b0312610.1021/acsami.7b03126 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10570-012-9758-510.1007/s10570-012-9758-5 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10439-016-1643-110.1007/s10439-016-1643-1 ↗
43. 10.3390/polym907030210.3390/polym9070302 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsami.8b1303110.1021/acsami.8b13031 ↗
45. 10.1002/polb.2461010.1002/polb.24610 ↗
46. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0258610.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02586 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.07610.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.076 ↗
48. 10.1002/app.4558110.1002/app.45581 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.12.00710.1016/j.carbpol.2005.12.007 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.17210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.172 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.04.01410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.04.014 ↗
52. 10.1021/la504576p10.1021/la504576p ↗
53. 10.3390/polym908034610.3390/polym9080346 ↗
54. 10.1039/C9NJ05834F10.1039/C9NJ05834F ↗
55. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.06.02210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.06.022 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0164810.1021/acsomega.7b01648 ↗
57. 10.3390/ma1110187210.3390/ma11101872 ↗
58. Engels T. A. P. · 2012 · 2 · 72310.1016/B978-0-444-53349-4.00054-6 ↗
59. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0245810.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02458 ↗
60. Menard K. P. · 2017
61. 10.1002/pc.2088010.1002/pc.20880 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.07410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.074 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.05110.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.051 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.01810.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.018 ↗
65. 10.3390/polym1012132510.3390/polym10121325 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10977310.1016/j.matdes.2021.109773 ↗
67. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0245510.1021/acsomega.9b02455 ↗
68. 10.1007/s11705-019-1836-x10.1007/s11705-019-1836-x ↗
69. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.03.02710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.03.027 ↗
70. 10.1002/1521-3765(20021202)8:23<5481::AID-CHEM5481>3.0.CO;2-810.1002/1521-3765(20021202)8:23<5481::AID-CHEM5481>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗