High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Validation of Thermophysical Properties of Polymers for Various Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent advances in graphics processing unit (GPU) hardware and improved efficiencies of atomistic simulation programs allow for the screening of a large number of polymers to predict properties that require running and analyzing long molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories. This paper outlines a MD simulation workflow based on GPU MD simulation and the refined optimized potentials for liquid simulation (OPLS) OPLS3e force field to calculate glass transition temperatures (Tgs) of 315 polymers for which Bicerano reported experimental values [Bicerano, J. Prediction of Polymer Properties; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 1996]. Applying the workflow across this large set of polymers allowed for a comprehensive evaluation of the protocol performance and helped in understanding its merits and limitations. We observe a consistent trend between predicted Tg values and empirical observation across several subsets of polymers. Thus, the protocol established in this work is promising for exploring targeted chemical spaces and aids in the evaluation of polymers for various applications, including composites, coatings, electrical casings, etc. During the stepwise cooling simulation for the calculation of Tg, a subset of polymers clearly showed an ordered structure developing as the temperature decreased. Such polymers have a point of discontinuity on the specific volume vs temperature plot, which we associate with the melting temperature (Tm). We demonstrate the distinction between crystallized and amorphous polymers by examining polyethylene. Linear polyethylene shows a discontinuity in the specific volume vs temperature plot, but we do not observe the discontinuity for branched polyethylene simulations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · Material Dynamics and Properties · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Schrödinger, Inc., Portland, Oregon 97204, United States
Schrödinger, Inc., San Diego, California 92121, United States
Schrödinger, Inc., Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB1 2JD, U.K.
Schrödinger, Inc., K.K., Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0005, Japan
Schrödinger, Inc., New York, New York 10036, United States
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.03010.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.030 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.03180110.1103/PhysRevE.63.031801 ↗
3. 10.1209/0295-5075/27/1/01110.1209/0295-5075/27/1/011 ↗
4. 10.1007/bf0191238810.1007/bf01912388 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.11.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.11.008 ↗
6. 10.1016/0032-3861(75)90194-910.1016/0032-3861(75)90194-9 ↗
7. Kremer F. · 2002
8. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.07.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.07.007 ↗
9. Bicerano J. · 1996
10. 10.1021/ma00104a03610.1021/ma00104a036 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.09.06910.1016/j.polymer.2015.09.069 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.01.07410.1016/j.polymer.2016.01.074 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.fluid.2012.07.01210.1016/j.fluid.2012.07.012 ↗
14. 10.1021/ma401163210.1021/ma4011632 ↗
15. 10.1002/polb.2346010.1002/polb.23460 ↗
16. 10.1039/C5RA21115H10.1039/C5RA21115H ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.05.05110.1016/j.polymer.2012.05.051 ↗
18. 10.1002/pat.3632_110.1002/pat.3632_1 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.07.02610.1016/j.polymer.2012.07.026 ↗
20. 10.1021/ma201927n10.1021/ma201927n ↗
21. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2006.08.02810.1016/j.porgcoat.2006.08.028 ↗
22. 10.1002/masy.20120003610.1002/masy.201200036 ↗
23. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.8310.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.83 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.2611010.1002/app.26110 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.06180310.1103/PhysRevE.74.061803 ↗
26. 10.1002/polb.2348910.1002/polb.23489 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.00910.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.009 ↗
28. 10.1021/jp205205x10.1021/jp205205x ↗
29. Afzal, M. A. F.; Sanders, J. M.; Goldberg, A.; Browning, A. R.; Halls, M. D. In Using Molecular Simulation with High-Temperature Composites Resins , SAMPE, Charlotte, NC, 2019.
30. 10.1016/0032-3861(84)90284-210.1016/0032-3861(84)90284-2 ↗
31. 10.1016/0032-3861(85)90192-210.1016/0032-3861(85)90192-2 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.174414110.1063/1.1744141 ↗
33. 10.1002/app.1969.07013021410.1002/app.1969.070130214 ↗
34. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-030212-18432910.1146/annurev-conmatphys-030212-184329 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.125410.1103/PhysRevA.33.1254 ↗
36. 10.1021/ma202127p10.1021/ma202127p ↗
37. Boyer R. F. · 1978
38. 10.1002/pol.1984.13022121010.1002/pol.1984.130221210 ↗
39. Murray G. · 199710.1201/9781482292237 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0079-6700(02)00085-010.1016/S0079-6700(02)00085-0 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.11570210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.115702 ↗
42. 10.1021/ma011370q10.1021/ma011370q ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.12020510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120205 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.511347710.1063/1.5113477 ↗
45. 2018
46. Schrödinger Release 2016-4: Desmond Molecular Dynamics System ; Schrödinger: New York, NY, 2016.
47. 10.1021/ma00227a01910.1021/ma00227a019 ↗
48. Shaw, D. E.; Grossman, J. P.; Bank, J. A.; Batson, B.; Butts, J. A.; Chao, J. C.; Deneroff, M. M.; Dror, R. O.; Even, A.; Fenton, C. H.; Forte, A.; Gagliardo, J.; Gill, G.; Greskamp, B.; Ho, C. R.; Ierardi, D. J.; Iserovich, L.; Kuskin, J. S.; Larson, R. H.; Layman, T.; Lee, L.; Lerer, A. K.; Li, C.; Killebrew, D.; Mackenzie, K. M.; Mok, S. Y.; Moraes, M. A.; Mueller, R.; Nociolo, L. J.; Peticolas, J. L.; Quan, T.; Ramot, D.; Salmon, J. K.; Scarpazza, D. P.; Schafer, U. B.; Siddique, N.; Snyder, C. W.; Spengler, J.; Tang, P. T. P.; Theobald, M.; Toma, H.; Towles, B.; Vitale, B.; Wang, S. C.; Young, C. In Anton 2: Raising the Bar for Performance and Programmability in a Special-Purpose Molecular Dynamics Supercomputer , SC’14: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, Nov 16–21, 2014; pp 41–53.10.1109/SC.2014.9 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b0086410.1021/acs.jctc.5b00864 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b0102610.1021/acs.jctc.8b01026 ↗
51. 10.1021/ct900587b10.1021/ct900587b ↗
52. 10.1021/ja962176010.1021/ja9621760 ↗
53. 10.1021/ja00214a00110.1021/ja00214a001 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.44733410.1063/1.447334 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.46746810.1063/1.467468 ↗
57. 10.1021/ci00057a00510.1021/ci00057a005 ↗
58. 10.1039/C9SC02677K10.1039/C9SC02677K ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b0004910.1021/acs.jctc.6b00049 ↗
60. Afzal M. A. F. · 2018
61. 10.26434/chemrxiv.6406886.v110.26434/chemrxiv.6406886.v1 ↗
62. 10.1039/C9ME00039A10.1039/C9ME00039A ↗
63. 10.1039/C8SM02051E10.1039/C8SM02051E ↗
64. 10.1038/s41467-020-14656-810.1038/s41467-020-14656-8 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.02210.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.022 ↗
66. 10.1007/s10853-012-6639-010.1007/s10853-012-6639-0 ↗
67. 10.1088/1361-651X/aaf8ca10.1088/1361-651X/aaf8ca ↗
68. 10.1002/app.4206610.1002/app.42066 ↗
69. 10.1002/pol.1958.120301211110.1002/pol.1958.1203012111 ↗
70. 10.1063/1.490521610.1063/1.4905216 ↗
71. 10.1016/0032-3861(84)90291-X10.1016/0032-3861(84)90291-X ↗
72. 10.1021/ma025930c10.1021/ma025930c ↗
73. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.10.13810.1016/j.polymer.2005.10.138 ↗
74. Hallensleben M. L. · 2000 · 1