Importance of Polymer Rheology on Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing: Correlating Process Physics to Print Properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent advances in the field of additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing, have garnered serious interest for its potential to substitute time-consuming and costly subtractive and formative manufacturing techniques. Material extrusion (MatEx), employing filament and pellet-based feedstocks, is an AM technique for fabricating three-dimensional objects dictated by a computer-aided design (CAD) file in a layer-by-layer manner. Being inherently a “melt-and-form” technique, the physics of MatEx is strongly dependent on the melt flow behavior of the polymers and hence on their rheology. The focus of this review article is to analyze the current progress in rheological characterizations of filament and pellet-based polymeric feedstocks for application in MatEx. The importance of shear and temperature-dependent viscosities in relation to consistent extrusion through the print nozzle and in the standoff region between nozzle and bed will be highlighted. The importance of shear and/or extensional viscosities and extent of die swell (upon exit from the nozzle) experienced by the polymers under processing parameters relevant to MatEx will be investigated. Postextrusion from the nozzle, the rheological characteristics of the viscous polymer melt as it cools once deposited on the print bed governs the degree of interlayer welding, that impacts the mechanical performance of the printed parts. Controlling and monitoring rheological properties such as zero-shear viscosities and shear moduli of the melt is of significant importance in this region in order to ensure proper mechanical robustness and shape integrity of the deposited layers. Both experimental and theoretical approaches based on polymer chain reptation mechanisms will be reviewed in detail and suggestions to address the existing limitations associated with the process will be provided. Fundamental understanding of the correlation between the classical theories and current understanding based on recent experimentation and analysis is expected to assist the design and development of the next generation of polymer feedstocks and machine designs for MatEx-based AM.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0007410.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.01910.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 ↗
3. 10.4416/JCST2014-0003210.4416/JCST2014-00032 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10121810.1016/j.addma.2020.101218 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00170-017-0239-810.1007/s00170-017-0239-8 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.01810.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10063810.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100638 ↗
10. 10.1080/16864360.2007.1073849310.1080/16864360.2007.10738493 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.01010.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.00410.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.00110.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.07210.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.072 ↗
15. 10.1039/C5CS00714C10.1039/C5CS00714C ↗
16. 10.1021/bk-2019-1315.ch00610.1021/bk-2019-1315.ch006 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.01510.1016/j.addma.2018.05.015 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.4854510.1002/app.48545 ↗
19. 10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-001210.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.04010.1016/j.addma.2018.10.040 ↗
21. 10.1108/RPJ-12-2015-018310.1108/RPJ-12-2015-0183 ↗
22. 10.1108/RPJ-06-2012-005210.1108/RPJ-06-2012-0052 ↗
23. Osborn, T.; Zhou, E.; Gerzeski, R.; Mollenhauer, D.; Tandon, G. P.; Whitney, T. J.; Iarve, E. V. Experimental and Theoretical Evaluation of Stiffness Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling Parts. InAmerican Society of Composites-30th Technical Conference; 2015.
24. Sheth, S.; Taylor, R. M.; Adluru, H. Numerical Investigation of Stiffness Properties of Fdm Parts as a Function of Raster Orientation. InProceedings of the 28th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium; Austin, Texas, 2017.
25. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.01.00410.1016/j.addma.2019.01.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.06810.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.068 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.06.00210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.06.002 ↗
28. Ajinjeru, C.; Kishore, V.; Liu, P.; Hassen, A. A.; Lindahl, J. M.; Kunc, V.; Duty, C. E. Rheological Evaluation of High Temperature Polymers to Identify Successful Extrusion Parameters. InProceedings of the 28th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium; Austin, Texas, 2017.
29. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.02210.1016/j.addma.2018.10.022 ↗
30. Gilmer E. L. · 2019
31. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0112710.1021/acsapm.9b01127 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10594810.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105948 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.00810.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.008 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.06.00510.1016/j.polymer.2019.06.005 ↗
35. 10.1002/mame.20180076410.1002/mame.201800764 ↗
36. Karis T. E. · Journal of Imaging Science and Technology · 1996 · 40 · 14710.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.1996.40.2.art00010 ↗
37. Dealy J. · Rheology Bulletin · 2009 · 78 · 16
38. Bird R. B. · 1987 · 1
39. Ferry J. D. · 1980
40. 10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.12310.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.123 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12774210.1016/j.matlet.2020.127742 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.02110.1016/j.addma.2018.02.021 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10123910.1016/j.addma.2020.101239 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10973-020-09859-610.1007/s10973-020-09859-6 ↗
45. 10.1122/1.501296910.1122/1.5012969 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.02.00410.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.02.004 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.04710.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.047 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.02010.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.020 ↗
49. 10.1520/STP44206S10.1520/STP44206S ↗
50. 10.1002/pol.1958.120281181210.1002/pol.1958.1202811812 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10075410.1016/j.apmt.2020.100754 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.01210.1016/j.addma.2018.10.012 ↗
53. 10.3390/ma1107119110.3390/ma11071191 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.11.01210.1016/j.xphs.2018.11.012 ↗
55. 10.3850/978-981-07-7247-5_35910.3850/978-981-07-7247-5_359 ↗
56. 10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-001710.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0017 ↗
57. 10.1122/1.503768710.1122/1.5037687 ↗
58. Beer F. P. · 1992
59. 10.1108/1355254001037334410.1108/13552540010373344 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.01.00210.1016/j.addma.2019.01.002 ↗
61. 10.1122/1.505464810.1122/1.5054648 ↗
62. 10.1016/S1007-0214(09)70063-X10.1016/S1007-0214(09)70063-X ↗
63. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.334-335.124110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.334-335.1241 ↗
64. 10.1007/s10856-007-3203-610.1007/s10856-007-3203-6 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10116110.1016/j.addma.2020.101161 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10100110.1016/j.addma.2019.101001 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10145410.1016/j.addma.2020.101454 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10079410.1016/j.addma.2019.100794 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.03110.1016/j.addma.2018.10.031 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.01310.1016/j.addma.2017.12.013 ↗
71. 10.1122/1.502298210.1122/1.5022982 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.02210.1016/j.addma.2018.09.022 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.03010.1016/j.addma.2018.04.030 ↗
74. 10.1122/1.497385210.1122/1.4973852 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.00510.1016/j.addma.2016.06.005 ↗
76. 10.3139/978344640181510.3139/9783446401815 ↗
77. 10.1115/1.168837710.1115/1.1688377 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10168710.1016/j.addma.2020.101687 ↗
79. Serdeczny M. · 2021 · 25110.1007/978-3-030-54334-1_18 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10101910.1016/j.addma.2019.101019 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.03010.1016/j.addma.2018.09.030 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.00710.1016/j.addma.2017.03.007 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10099710.1016/j.addma.2019.100997 ↗
84. Serdeczny M. P. · 2019 · 141
85. Polychronopoulos N. D. · 2018 · 133
86. 10.1007/BF0197347910.1007/BF01973479 ↗
87. 10.1063/1.360447910.1063/1.3604479 ↗
88. Wang Z. · Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium – An Additive Manufacturing Conference · 2017 · 1082
89. Comminal R. B. · Nordic Rheology Society Annual Transactions · 2017 · 25 · 263
90. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.05610.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.056 ↗
91. Heller B. P. · Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication · 2015 · 1220
92. 10.1122/1.497683910.1122/1.4976839 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.05110.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.051 ↗
94. 10.1007/s00170-018-2820-110.1007/s00170-018-2820-1 ↗
95. 10.1002/app.4877710.1002/app.48777 ↗
96. 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.1997.23.25910.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.1997.23.259 ↗
97. 10.1007/s12289-019-01523-110.1007/s12289-019-01523-1 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2017.12.00510.1016/j.jnnfm.2017.12.005 ↗
99. Jeong, J.H.; Leonov, A. I. Quasi-1D Modeling of Polymer Melt Die Swell in Short Dies.arXiv2003; physics/0308013.
100. 10.1177/168781401876618810.1177/1687814018766188 ↗