Ion Flux-Induced Effects on the Nanoscale Morphology of Poly(dimethylsiloxane): Implications for Tunable SERS Response
Source abstract
Abstract
Micro and nanoscale patterning of polymeric surfaces has attracted considerable interest due to its relevance in flexible electronics, biosensing devices, optical components, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrates. We investigate the evolution of nanoscale surface morphology in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) under low-energy ion irradiation, focusing on the role of ion flux. While ion-beam-induced patterning in polymers has been widely studied, the flux-dependent mechanisms governing stress generation and wrinkle formation at the nanoscale in PDMS remain largely unexplored. Our results reveal a strong flux dependence in surface morphology and wrinkle development. At lower beam currents, corresponding to ion fluxes ∼10 14 ions cm –2 s –1, longer irradiation times allow viscoelastic relaxation and radical recombination, thereby limiting compressive stress buildup and producing weakly developed wrinkles. In contrast, higher beam currents, corresponding to ion fluxes ∼10 15 ions cm –2 s –1, promote rapid ion-induced surface stiffening, enabling efficient compressive stress accumulation and the formation of well-defined wrinkle patterns. In contrast, crystalline Si irradiated under identical conditions shows negligible surface morphological evolution, underscoring the fundamentally different response of polymeric and crystalline materials. Nanomechanical measurements reveal a clear increase in the Young’s modulus of the irradiated surface layer, from 1.5 MPa (pristine) to 11 MPa upon irradiation indicating progressive stiffening with ion exposure. Complementary X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirms the formation of a silica-like SiO x layer confined within the ion penetration depth, establishing the chemical origin of the mechanical modification. Finally, SERS measurements on the patterned surfaces show a systematic dependence of enhancement, albeit small, on beam current, demonstrating that ion-beam-driven morphology control provides a versatile route to engineer functional nanostructured SERS-active polymer substrates.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Surface Modification and Applications Laboratory (SMAL)
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Funding
University Grants Commission
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/srep0864110.1038/srep08641 ↗
2. 10.1002/adom.20180019510.1002/adom.201800195 ↗
3. 10.1039/C7RA06997A10.1039/C7RA06997A ↗
4. 10.1021/la200202u10.1021/la200202u ↗
5. 10.3390/ma1010111510.3390/ma10101115 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.07.00810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.07.008 ↗
7. 10.1021/la100620410.1021/la1006204 ↗
8. Hano N. · Roy. Soc. Chem. · 2017 · 25 · 9147
9. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.16267710.1016/j.apsusc.2025.162677 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.02610.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.026 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.02.08710.1016/j.apsusc.2008.02.087 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.360650510.1063/1.3606505 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20050071710.1002/adma.200500717 ↗
14. 10.1039/c1sm05152k10.1039/c1sm05152k ↗
15. 10.1063/1.12587310.1063/1.125873 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.00210.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.12.04210.1016/j.apsusc.2011.12.042 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0382210.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03822 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10529-014-1569-310.1007/s10529-014-1569-3 ↗
20. 10.1073/pnas.061065410410.1073/pnas.0610654104 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.16555810.1016/j.apsusc.2025.165558 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14651010.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146510 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0147310.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01473 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14751510.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147515 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.nimb.2019.04.05010.1016/j.nimb.2019.04.050 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.nimb.2019.08.03310.1016/j.nimb.2019.08.033 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.05710.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.057 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.05.00410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.05.004 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.02.03810.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.02.038 ↗
30. 10.1116/1.57556110.1116/1.575561 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0075488810.1007/BF00754888 ↗
32. 10.2478/s11534-011-0096-210.2478/s11534-011-0096-2 ↗
33. 10.1002/adom.20130045710.1002/adom.201300457 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41598-018-32378-210.1038/s41598-018-32378-2 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.5b0714710.1021/acsami.5b07147 ↗
36. Naumkin A. V.
37. 10.1103/physrevlett.90.07430210.1103/physrevlett.90.074302 ↗
38. 10.1038/3019310.1038/30193 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0034510.1021/acs.jpcc.0c00345 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.09110.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091 ↗
41. 10.1039/D1CP03576B10.1039/D1CP03576B ↗