journal article·2026-06-19

Enhanced CO 2 Transport via Interfacial Engineering in Pebax-Based Mixed-Matrix Membranes Incorporating 2D Ni–Al–Fe Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets

Ishaq Ahmad, Hobin Jee, Jeng Yi Chong, Chong Yang Chuah, Euntae Yang

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 9· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

Pebax is an attractive material for carbon capture membranes because its polyether-rich segments provide favorable CO 2 -philic pathways. However, pristine Pebax-1657 membranes are still constrained by the conventional permeability–selectivity trade-off, limiting further improvements in separation performance. Incorporating functional nanofillers into Pebax matrices offers a promising strategy to overcome this limitation; however, achieving well-controlled polymer–filler interfaces remains critical for simultaneously enhancing CO 2 permeability and CO 2 /N 2 selectivity. Herein, we report an interfacial engineering strategy using two-dimensional Ni–Al–Fe layered double hydroxide nanosheets containing three metal cations, hereafter referred to as layered triple hydroxide (LTH), as a functional filler in Pebax-1657 membranes. The multimetal LTH nanosheets exhibited a layered platelet morphology, abundant hydroxyl-rich surface chemistry, and a CO 2 adsorption capacity of 0.75 mmol/g, providing favorable interfacial compatibility with the Pebax matrix. Structural, sorption, mechanical, and thermal analyses suggest that well-dispersed LTH nanosheets at low loading preserve the overall Pebax soft-segment transition while partially modifying local chain ordering and polymer–filler interactions, thereby promoting more selective CO 2 transport. At an optimal LTH loading of 0.1 wt %, the MMM achieved a CO 2 permeability of 183 barrer and a CO 2 /N 2 selectivity of 78 at 35 °C and 1 bar, corresponding to improvements of 33% and 42%, respectively, compared with the pristine Pebax-1657 membrane. Under elevated temperature operation at 60 °C, the optimized MMM further achieved a CO 2 permeability of 631.6 barrer and a CO 2 /N 2 selectivity of 99, surpassing both the 2008 and 2019 Robeson upper bounds for CO 2 /N 2 separation. The membrane also maintained stable performance over 120 h of continuous operation. These findings demonstrate that ternary-metal LDH-based interfacial engineering is an effective route to enhance CO 2 /N 2 separation in Pebax-based MMMs while maintaining structural stability at low filler loading.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Catalysts for Methane Reforming · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Marine Environmental Engineering

Gyeongsang National University

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

University of Southampton

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering

Universiti Malaya

Sustainable Process Engineering Centre (SPEC), Department of Chemical Engineering

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Universiti Malaya

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.02310.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.023 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jngse.2019.04.00810.1016/j.jngse.2019.04.008 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0009110.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00091 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.psep.2025.10781710.1016/j.psep.2025.107817 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ccst.2025.10044110.1016/j.ccst.2025.100441 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ccst.2025.10036610.1016/j.ccst.2025.100366 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41699-023-00425-w10.1038/s41699-023-00425-w ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.05310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.053 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.10041010.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100410 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11829310.1016/j.memsci.2020.118293 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.06.02810.1016/j.memsci.2016.06.028 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14829410.1016/j.cej.2023.148294 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10616410.1016/j.jece.2021.106164 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2611710.1002/pc.26117 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jece.2023.10939910.1016/j.jece.2023.109399 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.memsci.2024.12279710.1016/j.memsci.2024.122797 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.memsci.2024.12338110.1016/j.memsci.2024.123381 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-021-23121-z10.1038/s41467-021-23121-z ↗
19. 10.1007/s10973-018-7152-810.1007/s10973-018-7152-8 ↗
20. 10.1021/jp508678k10.1021/jp508678k ↗
21. 10.1016/j.inoche.2025.11405210.1016/j.inoche.2025.114052 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.10154410.1016/j.jcou.2021.101544 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10756810.1016/j.jece.2022.107568 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0398310.1021/acs.iecr.4c03983 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.13887810.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138878 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jece.2025.12016910.1016/j.jece.2025.120169 ↗
27. 10.1039/D1RA03289E10.1039/D1RA03289E ↗
28. 10.1021/ic400876310.1021/ic4008763 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-022-31106-910.1038/s41467-022-31106-9 ↗
30. 10.1007/s43939-025-00393-610.1007/s43939-025-00393-6 ↗
31. 10.1039/C3TA14048B10.1039/C3TA14048B ↗
32. 10.1016/0920-5861(91)80068-K10.1016/0920-5861(91)80068-K ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10490910.1016/j.jece.2020.104909 ↗
34. 10.1039/C6TA04052G10.1039/C6TA04052G ↗
35. 10.1002/maco.20211240210.1002/maco.202112402 ↗
36. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-100110.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-1001 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41467-026-68730-810.1038/s41467-026-68730-8 ↗
38. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0578310.1021/acscatal.2c05783 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41598-025-34294-810.1038/s41598-025-34294-8 ↗
40. 10.1021/ic030054k10.1021/ic030054k ↗
41. 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10299110.1016/j.rineng.2024.102991 ↗
42. 10.1039/c3ta13039h10.1039/c3ta13039h ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.14055110.1016/j.cej.2022.140551 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.05.01410.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.05.014 ↗
45. 10.1021/ie501051510.1021/ie5010515 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.04910.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.049 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.07710.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.077 ↗
48. 10.1039/D3EY00080J10.1039/D3EY00080J ↗
49. 10.1016/j.gce.2024.09.00910.1016/j.gce.2024.09.009 ↗
50. 10.1039/D3YA00117B10.1039/D3YA00117B ↗
51. 10.3390/polym1404065510.3390/polym14040655 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.02510.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.025 ↗
53. 10.1039/D5MH02360B10.1039/D5MH02360B ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.005 ↗
55. 10.1039/C5TA09060A10.1039/C5TA09060A ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jece.2025.11719110.1016/j.jece.2025.117191 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c0230810.1021/acs.iecr.3c02308 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11975810.1016/j.memsci.2021.119758 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.gee.2016.09.00210.1016/j.gee.2016.09.002 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.03310.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.033 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.04810.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.048 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.12008610.1016/j.memsci.2021.120086 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.05910.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.059 ↗
64. 10.1002/ange.20140956310.1002/ange.201409563 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11819010.1016/j.seppur.2020.118190 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11650010.1016/j.seppur.2020.116500 ↗
67. 10.1002/ghg.197010.1002/ghg.1970 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.memsci.2025.12374010.1016/j.memsci.2025.123740 ↗