journal article·2026-06-12Open access

Delineating Oxidation Aspects of an Additively Manufactured Nanoprecipitation-Strengthened Al 0.2 Co 1.5 CrFeNi 1.5 Ti 0.3 High-Entropy Alloy

Poresh Kumar, Tu-Ngoc Lam, Po-Heng Chou, An-Chou Yeh, Peter K. Liaw, E-Wen Huang, Sudhanshu Shekhar Singh

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 9· Issue 23

Abstract

The recent perspective of multiprincipal element alloys (MPEAs), also known as high-entropy alloys (HEAs), has emerged as a very promising area for material design. Additive manufacturing (AM) strategies have also been noted to provide additional strength to HEA systems. In the selected dual-nanoprecipitation Al 0.2 Co 1.5 CrFeNi 1.5 Ti 0.3 HEA system, an additional strength of approximately 300–400 MPa was achieved by adopting an additive manufacturing route as compared to its cast and wrought counterparts. However, the challenge of oxidation degradation always imposes a severe limitation for high-temperature applications in gas turbines, power plants, and aerospace components. Hence, ensuring material sustainability, longevity, and integrity for high-temperature applications inevitably requires the exploration of the oxidation behavior of alloys. In the current study, the oxidation performance of Al 0.2 Co 1.5 CrFeNi 1.5 Ti 0.3 HEA, in as-printed as well as nanoprecipitation-strengthened aged states, was evaluated from 600°C to 1200°C. A comparative framework elucidating the mechanistic aspects and elemental redistribution of nanoprecipitates on oxidation behavior has been highlighted. In both the as-printed and aged states, the alloys followed subparabolic oxidation weight gain kinetics below 900°C. However, the thickness growth kinetics exhibited parabolic behavior above 900°C. The oxide layer exploration manifested the formation of a homogeneous Cr-oxide layer, which acts as a protective barrier against oxidation activity. The impact of atomic size on mobility also played a significant role in suppressing the formation of outer Al and Ti oxide layers, instead of having a lower reduction potential compared to Cr.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High Entropy Alloys Studies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

International College of Semiconductor Technology

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Indian Institute of Technology

High Entropy Materials Center

National Tsing Hua University

Cuu long University

Department of Materials Science & Engineering

The University of Tennessee

Funding

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur · Army Research Office · National Science and Technology Council · Ministry of Education, Taiwan · ICST-NYCU Taiwan · National Science Foundation (NSF)

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adem.20030056710.1002/adem.200300567 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.25710.1016/j.msea.2003.10.257 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.10.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.01510.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.015 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mser.2021.10064510.1016/j.mser.2021.100645 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.03310.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.033 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.intermet.2018.05.01310.1016/j.intermet.2018.05.013 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41529-017-0009-y10.1038/s41529-017-0009-y ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.04110.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.041 ↗
10. 10.3390/met702004310.3390/met7020043 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10853-012-6260-210.1007/s10853-012-6260-2 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.intermet.2012.03.00510.1016/j.intermet.2012.03.005 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.04510.1016/j.msea.2018.01.045 ↗
14. 10.1038/nature1798110.1038/nature17981 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.07610.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.076 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.04910.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.049 ↗
17. 10.1002/advs.20210087010.1002/advs.202100870 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-018-06600-810.1038/s41467-018-06600-8 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.04210.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.042 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13894010.1016/j.msea.2020.138940 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.14010.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.140 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.31810.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.318 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.02310.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.023 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13949210.1016/j.msea.2020.139492 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.29810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.298 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.intermet.2018.10.01810.1016/j.intermet.2018.10.018 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.10614710.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106147 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10160110.1016/j.addma.2020.101601 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.mtla.2026.10275710.1016/j.mtla.2026.102757 ↗
30. Kumar, P.; Lam, T.N.; Luo, M.Y.; Amalia, L.; Lai, J.S.; Hsu, S.T.; An, K.; Chen, Y.; Yu, D.; Lee, S. Y.; Jain, J.; Liaw, P. K.; Chou, P.H.; Yeh, A.C.; Kuo, W. C. H.; Singh, S. S.; Huang, E. W.Dual-precipitates enhance fatigue resistance in an additively manufactured high-entropy alloy Commun. Mater. 2026 10.1038/s43246-026-01129-6.10.1038/s43246-026-01129-6 ↗
31. 10.1007/s42452-021-04374-110.1007/s42452-021-04374-1 ↗
32. 10.1063/5.011660510.1063/5.0116605 ↗
33. 10.3390/ma1410259510.3390/ma14102595 ↗
34. 10.1002/adem.20240110210.1002/adem.202401102 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17759610.1016/j.jallcom.2024.177596 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.03310.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.033 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11837-015-1560-z10.1007/s11837-015-1560-z ↗
38. 10.1016/j.intermet.2018.04.00610.1016/j.intermet.2018.04.006 ↗
39. 10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63733-510.1016/S1003-6326(15)63733-5 ↗
40. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab640a10.1088/2053-1591/ab640a ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.08.10210.1016/j.jallcom.2013.08.102 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.03610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.036 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15551810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155518 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16018010.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160180 ↗
45. 10.1007/s11837-015-1517-210.1007/s11837-015-1517-2 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15398310.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153983 ↗
47. Birks N. · 200610.1017/CBO9781139163903 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.corsci.2025.11327310.1016/j.corsci.2025.113273 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.07.00310.1016/j.corsci.2015.07.003 ↗
50. Hauffe K. · 2012
51. 10.1080/10426914.2015.103790610.1080/10426914.2015.1037906 ↗
52. 10.1038/s41467-024-49243-810.1038/s41467-024-49243-8 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.intermet.2026.10917010.1016/j.intermet.2026.109170 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.18389310.1016/j.jallcom.2025.183893 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15958310.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159583 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.11104410.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111044 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.07.00610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.07.006 ↗
58. 10.1515/htmp.2011.00610.1515/htmp.2011.006 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.01.01010.1016/j.corsci.2004.01.010 ↗
60. Ellingham H. J. · J. Soc. Chem. Ind. · 1944 · 63 · 12510.1002/jctb.5000630501 ↗
61. 10.3184/096034012X1334141710738210.3184/096034012X13341417107382 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.25710.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.257 ↗
63. 10.1007/s11837-014-1185-710.1007/s11837-014-1185-7 ↗
64. 10.1007/s11085-016-9616-110.1007/s11085-016-9616-1 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.06.05010.1016/j.corsci.2008.06.050 ↗
66. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0386510.1021/acsanm.1c03865 ↗
67. 10.1021/acsnano.3c1093510.1021/acsnano.3c10935 ↗