journal article·2026-06-12Open access

Reconfigurable Strain Gradient Polarity in Crystalline Oxide Nanomembranes for Controlled Bending of Functional Materials

Tiffany C. Wang, Minyong Han, Varun Harbola, Harold Y. Hwang

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 9· Issue 23

Abstract

We report the fabrication and mechanical characterization of a "bubble" geometry for accessing local strain gradients using freestanding, single-crystalline manganite nanomembranes: a switchable bistable nanodrum, with opposite strain gradient polarities. By leveraging epitaxial strain as a source of pre-strain and with control of geometrical and mechanical boundary conditions, the fabricated device can support strain gradients with strain variation ranging from 0.01% to 1%. Switching energetics can be designed to configure the bubble morphology. By providing a mechanical framework for sustained strain gradients, this platform supports scalable oxide membrane applications such as the mechanical manipulation of magnetism, coupled to local probes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

Department of Applied Physics

Stanford University

Department of Physics

Funding

Center for Energy Efficient Magnonics (CEEMag) funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences at SLAC · US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl401474810.1021/nl4014748 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aax975310.1126/science.aax9753 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-020-16912-310.1038/s41467-020-16912-3 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41565-021-01052-610.1038/s41565-021-01052-6 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat474910.1038/nmat4749 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41699-022-00315-710.1038/s41699-022-00315-7 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.01310.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.013 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41563-019-0529-710.1038/s41563-019-0529-7 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0478710.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04787 ↗
10. 10.1063/5.006046510.1063/5.0060465 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.aay722110.1126/science.aay7221 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-022-34233-510.1038/s41467-022-34233-5 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.15650510.1103/PhysRevLett.133.156505 ↗
14. 10.1002/pssb.20094521410.1002/pssb.200945214 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41567-022-01645-510.1038/s41567-022-01645-5 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-021-22784-y10.1038/s41467-021-22784-y ↗
17. Makarov D. · 2022 · 14610.1007/978-3-031-09086-8 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ssc.2009.12.04110.1016/j.ssc.2009.12.041 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.sna.2018.09.03810.1016/j.sna.2018.09.038 ↗
20. 10.1088/1361-6439/ab318510.1088/1361-6439/ab3185 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.11719910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117199 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20210682610.1002/adma.202106826 ↗
23. 10.1126/sciadv.add331010.1126/sciadv.add3310 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41565-020-0700-y10.1038/s41565-020-0700-y ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.04.00910.1016/j.jmat.2021.04.009 ↗
26. 10.1063/5.015768710.1063/5.0157687 ↗