Effect of noise on Bloch oscillations and Wannier-Stark localization
Source abstract
Abstract
We calculate an exact expression for the probability propagator for a noisy electric field driven tight-binding lattice. The noise considered is a two level jump process or a telegraph process (TP) which jumps randomly between two values $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\ensuremath{\mu}$. In the absence of a static field, and in the limit of zero jump rate of the noisy field, we find that the dynamics yields Bloch oscillations with frequency $\ensuremath{\mu}$, while with an additional static field $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ we find oscillatory motion with a superposition of frequencies $(\ensuremath{\epsilon}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\ensuremath{\mu})$. On the other hand, when the jump rate is rapid, and in the absence of a static field, the stochastic field averages to zero if the two states of the TP are equally probable a priori. In that case we see a delocalization effect. The intimate relationship between the rapid relaxation case and the zero field case seems to be a generic effect found in a wide variety of systems. It is interesting to note that even for zero static field and rapid relaxation, Bloch oscillations ensue if there is a bias $\ensuremath{\delta}p$ in the probabilities of the two levels. Remarkably, the Wannier-Stark localization caused by an additional static field is destroyed if the latter is tuned to be exactly equal and opposite to the average stochastic field $\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\delta}p$. This is an example of incoherent destruction of Wannier-Stark localization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.03292310.1103/PhysRevE.91.032923 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.05361210.1103/PhysRevA.94.053612 ↗
3. 10.1140/epjb/e2015-60356-210.1140/epjb/e2015-60356-2 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.20040310.1103/PhysRevLett.110.200403 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.14430110.1103/PhysRevB.96.144301 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.26040410.1103/PhysRevLett.95.260404 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.362510.1103/PhysRevB.34.3625 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.04540810.1103/PhysRevB.98.045408 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.01361110.1103/PhysRevA.79.013611 ↗
10. S. Arlinghaus · 2011
11. 10.1098/rspa.1934.011610.1098/rspa.1934.0116 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.549410.1103/PhysRevB.33.5494 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRev.117.43210.1103/PhysRev.117.432 ↗
14. 10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/00210.1088/1367-2630/6/1/002 ↗
15. 10.1209/0295-5075/32/3/00910.1209/0295-5075/32/3/009 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.391410.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3914 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.05362710.1103/PhysRevA.83.053627 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.07514310.1103/PhysRevB.86.075143 ↗
19. A. R. Kolovsky · J. Siberian Federal Univ. Math. Phys. · 2010 · 3 · 311
20. 10.1016/j.physleta.2011.06.00210.1016/j.physleta.2011.06.002 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRev.109.149210.1103/PhysRev.109.1492 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.142410.1103/PhysRevLett.39.1424 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.55310.1103/PhysRevLett.48.553 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.20.489610.1103/PhysRevB.20.4896 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0210947210.1007/BF02109472 ↗
26. 10.1143/JPSJ.50.247310.1143/JPSJ.50.2473 ↗
27. S. Dattagupta · 201310.1201/b16008 ↗
28. 10.1088/1367-2630/10/4/04502710.1088/1367-2630/10/4/045027 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.02361010.1103/PhysRevA.77.023610 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0167-9317(98)00153-110.1016/S0167-9317(98)00153-1 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.19740210.1103/PhysRevLett.91.197402 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.10430310.1103/PhysRevB.71.104303 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.662210.1103/PhysRevB.37.6622 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.88135310.1063/1.881353 ↗
35. 10.1088/0268-1242/9/5S/00210.1088/0268-1242/9/5S/002 ↗
36. 10.1088/0268-1242/9/11S/01710.1088/0268-1242/9/11S/017 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.450810.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4508 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.14040210.1103/PhysRevLett.87.140402 ↗
39. 10.1038/nature0700010.1038/nature07000 ↗
40. 10.1038/nature0707110.1038/nature07071 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.16511810.1103/PhysRevB.92.165118 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.05160510.1103/PhysRevA.86.051605 ↗
43. S. Dattagupta · 2012
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.24541710.1103/PhysRevB.82.245417 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.19543510.1103/PhysRevB.96.195435 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.544210.1103/PhysRevB.61.5442 ↗
47. 10.1016/0375-9601(88)90213-710.1016/0375-9601(88)90213-7 ↗
48. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.3.4.02910.21468/SciPostPhys.3.4.029 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.21680110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.216801 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.21430110.1103/PhysRevB.98.214301 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.06220510.1103/PhysRevE.93.062205 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.05430310.1103/PhysRevB.96.054303 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.03103410.1103/PhysRevX.7.031034 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRev.174.35110.1103/PhysRev.174.351 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.172163710.1063/1.1721637 ↗
56. 10.1088/1742-5468/2006/03/P0301010.1088/1742-5468/2006/03/P03010 ↗
57. 10.1007/s11071-012-0473-410.1007/s11071-012-0473-4 ↗