journal article·2025-12-24

Reconciling Kubo and Keldysh approaches to Fermi-sea-dependent nonequilibrium observables: Application to spin Hall current and spin-orbit torque in spintronics

Simão M. João, Marko D. Petrović, J. M. Viana Parente Lopes, Aires Ferreira, Branislav K. Nikolić

Physical Review B· Volume 112· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Quantum transport studies of spin-dependent phenomena in solids commonly employ the Kubo or Keldysh formulas for the nonequilibrium density operator in the steady-state linear-response regime. Its trace with operators of interest, such as the spin density, spin current density, etc., gives expectation values of experimentally accessible observables. For local quantities, these formulas require summing over the manifolds of {\em both} Fermi-surface and Fermi-sea states. However, debates have been raging in the literature about the vastly different physics the two formulations can apparently produce, even when applied to the same system. Here, we revisit this problem using infinite-size graphene with proximity-induced spin-orbit and magnetic exchange effects as a testbed. By splitting this system into semi-infinite leads and central active region, in the spirit of Landauer formulation of quantum transport, we prove the {\em numerically exact equivalence} of the Kubo and Keldysh approaches via the computation of spin Hall current density and spin-orbit torque in both clean and disordered limits. The key to reconciling the two approaches are the numerical frameworks we develop for: ({\em i}) evaluation of Kubo(-Bastin) formula for a system attached to semi-infinite leads, which ensures continuous energy spectrum and evades the need for commonly used phenomenological broadening introducing ambiguity; and ({\em ii}) proper evaluation of Fermi-sea term in the Keldysh approach, which {\em must} include the voltage drop across the central active region even if it is disorder free.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Topological Materials and Phenomena · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Imperial College London

University of Delaware

Universidade do Porto

University of York

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. L. E. Ballentine · 201410.1142/9038 ↗
2. M. Kardar · 200710.1017/CBO9780511815898 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.20514010.1103/PhysRevB.109.205140 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.04210210.1103/PhysRevA.90.042102 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L18040810.1103/PhysRevB.109.L180408 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.aop.2011.07.00110.1016/j.aop.2011.07.001 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.01112610.1103/PhysRevE.85.011126 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.09.00110.1016/j.physrep.2013.09.001 ↗
10. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/09304410.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093044 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.18720210.1103/PhysRevLett.125.187202 ↗
12. 10.1088/1751-8121/ac711910.1088/1751-8121/ac7119 ↗
13. 10.1143/JPSJ.12.57010.1143/JPSJ.12.570 ↗
14. 10.1142/9789811279461_000710.1142/9789811279461_0007 ↗
15. G. Stefanucci · 202510.1017/9781009536776 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0022-3697(71)80147-610.1016/S0022-3697(71)80147-6 ↗
17. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/zwqs-gpr4, which includes Refs. [116, 117, 118], for (i) summary of different commonly employed decompositions of Kubo Eq. (1) and Keldysh Eq. (4), as well as additional details on their numerical evaluation; (ii) one additional figure recalling a well-established [23, 63, 99] equivalence of Kubo and Keldysh formulas for conductance (i.e., longitudinal charge transport) calculations using an example of plain [i.e., without SOC and magnetism terms in Eq. (5)] graphene in Fig. 1; and (iii) for the same plain graphene, we also show that its density of states computed using the setup of Fig. 1 is identical to standard result [96] for infinite graphene.
18. 10.1088/0022-3719/10/12/02110.1088/0022-3719/10/12/021 ↗
19. 10.1088/0022-3719/15/22/00510.1088/0022-3719/15/22/005 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.01441610.1103/PhysRevB.64.014416 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.08511310.1103/PhysRevB.102.085113 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L01205710.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012057 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.816910.1103/PhysRevB.40.8169 ↗
24. 10.1088/0370-1328/71/4/30610.1088/0370-1328/71/4/306 ↗
25. 10.1098/rsos.19180910.1098/rsos.191809 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.12.00110.1016/j.physrep.2020.12.001 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.13440210.1103/PhysRevB.97.134402 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.17660210.1103/PhysRevLett.117.176602 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0236410.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02364 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.26630110.1103/PhysRevLett.132.266301 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.17442310.1103/PhysRevB.90.174423 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.22442610.1103/PhysRevB.97.224426 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.06040510.1103/PhysRevB.101.060405 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.08140710.1103/PhysRevB.98.081407 ↗
35. E. N. Economou · 200610.1007/3-540-28841-4 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.24532710.1103/PhysRevB.71.245327 ↗
37. 10.1209/0295-5075/111/3700410.1209/0295-5075/111/37004 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.13420210.1103/PhysRevB.94.134202 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.24680110.1103/PhysRevLett.119.246801 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L24140410.1103/PhysRevB.109.L241404 ↗
41. Y. Imry · 2002
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.07660210.1103/PhysRevLett.98.076602 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.19660110.1103/PhysRevLett.129.196601 ↗
44. 10.1088/0022-3719/14/3/00710.1088/0022-3719/14/3/007 ↗
45. 10.1088/2515-7639/ac91f910.1088/2515-7639/ac91f9 ↗
46. J. P. Boyd · 2000
47. 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.27510.1103/RevModPhys.78.275 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.10660110.1103/PhysRevLett.115.106601 ↗
49. 10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.7.1.00610.21468/SciPostPhysCore.7.1.006 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cpc.2020.10771410.1016/j.cpc.2020.107714 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.16540110.1103/PhysRevB.65.165401 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.04660110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.046601 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.11534210.1103/PhysRevB.73.115342 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.02440410.1103/PhysRevB.76.024404 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.20543010.1103/PhysRevB.79.205430 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.07530310.1103/PhysRevB.73.075303 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.18441110.1103/PhysRevB.101.184411 ↗
58. 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S30610.1103/RevModPhys.71.S306 ↗
59. Y. V. Nazarov · 200910.1017/CBO9780511626906 ↗
60. 10.1088/0022-3719/4/8/01810.1088/0022-3719/4/8/018 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevB.23.685110.1103/PhysRevB.23.6851 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.186232410.1063/1.1862324 ↗
63. 10.1088/0953-8984/1/30/00610.1088/0953-8984/1/30/006 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.251210.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2512 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.08542610.1103/PhysRevB.82.085426 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.04511510.1103/PhysRevB.90.045115 ↗
67. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.23542810.1103/PhysRevB.84.235428 ↗
68. 10.1088/0953-8984/16/21/R0110.1088/0953-8984/16/21/R01 ↗
69. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.03540710.1103/PhysRevB.78.035407 ↗
70. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.04305710.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043057 ↗
71. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.11545510.1103/PhysRevB.86.115455 ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.22441010.1103/PhysRevB.96.224410 ↗
73. 10.1142/S201032471330002810.1142/S2010324713300028 ↗
74. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.11541910.1103/PhysRevB.93.115419 ↗
75. B. K. Nikolić, K. Dolui, M. Petrović, P. Plecháč, T. Markussen, and K. Stokbro, First-principles quantum transport modeling of spin-transfer and spin-orbit torques in magnetic multilayers, in Handbook of Materials Modeling, edited by W. Andreoni and S. Yip (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 1–35.10.1007/978-3-319-50257-1_112-1 ↗
76. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.23720510.1103/PhysRevLett.97.237205 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.01910.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.019 ↗
78. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.01140110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.011401 ↗
79. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.24131510.1103/PhysRevB.68.241315 ↗
80. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.21443010.1103/PhysRevB.96.214430 ↗
81. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0455610.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04556 ↗
82. 10.1038/nnano.2014.1510.1038/nnano.2014.15 ↗
83. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.14440110.1103/PhysRevB.91.144401 ↗
84. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.13440210.1103/PhysRevB.91.134402 ↗
85. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.04340110.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043401 ↗
86. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.23541910.1103/PhysRevB.106.235419 ↗
87. 10.1038/nnano.2013.14510.1038/nnano.2013.145 ↗
88. Note that many Keldysh density matrix-based studies of current-driven 〈ŝi〉 [54, 119] or thereby induced spin torque [55, 81] in a two-terminal Landauer setup use only ρKeldyshsurf [Eq. (4b)], while evading computation of ρKeldyshsea [Eq. (4c)], which can produce results violating the gauge invariance [74, 120].
89. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.07630210.1103/PhysRevLett.132.076302 ↗
90. Note that there is widespread (but incorrect in the light of our study) perception that only the Kubo(-Bastin) formula evaluated for periodic lattices yields bulk quantities, while the Keldysh formula is needed for nonperiodic junctions with interfaces [119].
91. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.19660210.1103/PhysRevLett.116.196602 ↗
92. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.14443310.1103/PhysRevB.108.144433 ↗
93. D. T. S. Perkins · 2024
94. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.03340110.1103/PhysRevB.72.033401 ↗
95. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
96. Nevertheless, confusion occasionally arises in the literature, such as in Fig. 6 of Ref. [26] where the Kubo conductivity incorrectly does not match quantized conductance from the Keldysh approach.
97. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.670110.1103/PhysRevB.37.6701 ↗
98. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.16530310.1103/PhysRevB.64.165303 ↗
99. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.04541810.1103/PhysRevB.107.045418 ↗
100. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.12680210.1103/PhysRevLett.121.126802 ↗