journal article·2026-05-29

Water Splitting with Cu 4 TiX 4 (X = S and Se) Nanoparticle Electrocatalysts: Effect of the Lattice Structure and Anion Lability

Avinava Kundu, Achintya Lakshan, Simmi Gautam, Partha P. Jana, Biswarup Chakraborty

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 9· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

Herein, two bimetallic chalcogenides, Cu 4 TiX 4 (X= S and Se), prepared through a solid-state synthetic technique, are used as bifunctional electrode materials to study electrocatalytic water splitting. Despite the iso-stoichiometric formula, the Cu 4 TiSe 4 lattice adopts a cubic arrangement, while the Cu 4 TiS 4 lattice possesses a tetragonal structure. The difference in the bulk structure and atomic arrangement in the lattice arises from the structural disorder present in Cu 4 TiSe 4, as well as the difference in the ionic radius of S 2– and Se 2– . The structural disorder present in Cu 4 TiSe 4 also leads to a large variation in the Cu–Ti intermetallic distance and the presence of a dominant amount of Ti 4+ . Microscopic studies identified (111) and (101) planes as one of the major exposed facets for Cu 4 TiSe 4 and Cu 4 TiS 4, respectively. During the electrocatalytic water splitting study, Cu 4 TiSe 4 exhibits an overpotential of 323 mV (@10 mA cm –2 ) for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and 228 mV (@20 mA cm –2 ) for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), whereas the Cu 4 TiS 4 delivered overpotentials of 342 mV (for the OER) and 264 mV (for the HER). A steady performance (>18 h) in the chronoamperometric OER and HER conditions of Cu 4 TiSe 4 allows fabricating a water-splitting electrolyzer (NF/CTSe(+)/(−)CTSe/NF), which delivers a cell potential of 1.74 V at 10 mA cm –2 with a Faradaic efficiency of 92 ± 3% for hydrogen production, significantly lower cell potential than that of the previously reported water-splitting electrolyzer fabricated with copper-based materials. The postelectrocatalytic characterization of the electrodes established the superior stability of the Cu 4 TiSe 4 over Cu 4 TiS 4 due to strong covalent-type atomic connectivity between Cu 2+, Ti 4+, and Se 2– . The improved bifunctional activity of Cu 4 TiSe 4 can be attributed to its lattice stability, synergism between two 3d metals, and the presence of a significant quantity of Ti 3+ that controls the electrochemical activity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India

Department of Chemistry

Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur · Anusandhan National Research Foundation

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C8EE01157E10.1039/C8EE01157E ↗
2. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.13793410.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.137934 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.ado993810.1126/science.ado9938 ↗
4. 10.1002/celc.20210030710.1002/celc.202100307 ↗
5. 10.1039/D4TA00690A10.1039/D4TA00690A ↗
6. 10.1039/C6CS00328A10.1039/C6CS00328A ↗
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0011610.1021/acsenergylett.0c00116 ↗
8. 10.1039/C6TA04025J10.1039/C6TA04025J ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c0408910.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04089 ↗
10. 10.1039/D0TA09620B10.1039/D0TA09620B ↗
11. 10.1126/science.121285810.1126/science.1212858 ↗
12. 10.1002/smll.20180421210.1002/smll.201804212 ↗
13. 10.1002/advs.20240789210.1002/advs.202407892 ↗
14. 10.1039/D2TA08568B10.1039/D2TA08568B ↗
15. 10.1039/D0CS00962H10.1039/D0CS00962H ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0177410.1021/acsenergylett.8b01774 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0009110.1021/acsenergylett.9b00091 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsengineeringau.3c0001410.1021/acsengineeringau.3c00014 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15673610.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156736 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.23010.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.230 ↗
21. 10.1039/D4DT00633J10.1039/D4DT00633J ↗
22. 10.1039/D3CC00947E10.1039/D3CC00947E ↗
23. 10.1021/jacsau.3c0070310.1021/jacsau.3c00703 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12969810.1016/j.cej.2021.129698 ↗
25. 10.1149/2.063306jes10.1149/2.063306jes ↗
26. 10.1039/C8SC00873F10.1039/C8SC00873F ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20201422210.1002/anie.202014222 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c0090410.1021/acs.chemmater.4c00904 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c0383010.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03830 ↗
30. 10.1002/cssc.20200044510.1002/cssc.202000445 ↗
31. 10.1002/asia.20200002210.1002/asia.202000022 ↗
32. 10.1002/sia.74011110510.1002/sia.740111105 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c0328910.1021/acs.iecr.3c03289 ↗
34. 10.1039/D4TA05988C10.1039/D4TA05988C ↗
35. 10.1126/science.ads146610.1126/science.ads1466 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0519610.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05196 ↗
37. 10.1039/D0EE00673D10.1039/D0EE00673D ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0023410.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00234 ↗
39. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0020510.1021/acscatal.6b00205 ↗
40. 10.1021/acscatal.3c0099910.1021/acscatal.3c00999 ↗