Phonon spectra, quantum geometry, and the Goldstone theorem
Source abstract
Abstract
Phonons are essential quasiparticles of all crystals and play a key role in fundamental properties such as thermal transport and superconductivity. Acoustic phonons can be interpreted as Goldstone modes that emerge due to the spontaneous breaking of translational symmetry. In this article, we investigate the quantum geometric contribution to the phonon spectrum in the absence of Holstein phonons. Using graphene as a case study, we decompose the dynamical matrix into distinct terms that exhibit different dependencies on the electron energy and wave function. We then examine the role of quantum geometry in shaping the phonon spectrum of the material, and we find that removing the nontrivial quantum geometric contribution from the dynamical matrix causes the acoustic phonon modes to behave in a nonanalytic fashion.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Topological Materials and Phenomena · Quantum and electron transport phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Scuola Normale Superiore
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Princeton University
Donostia International Physics Center
Università di Pisa
Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
IKERBASQUE
ICFO-Institut de Ciències Fotòniques
The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology
Funding
European Commission · Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation · Office of Naval Research · Eusko Jaurlaritza
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. G. Grosso · 2014
2. M. P. Marder · 201010.1002/9780470949955 ↗
3. Y. I. Frenkel · 1932
4. M. Tinkham · 2004
5. 10.1038/nature1238510.1038/nature12385 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.124435810.1126/science.1244358 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.20521410.1103/PhysRevB.71.205214 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.05210.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.052 ↗
10. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/23/23320310.1088/0953-8984/24/23/233203 ↗
11. 10.1038/nnano.2013.4610.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
12. 10.1134/S106377610708012210.1134/S1063776107080122 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.16540810.1103/PhysRevB.90.165408 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat416910.1038/nmat4169 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aan273510.1126/science.aan2735 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41586-018-0136-910.1038/s41586-018-0136-9 ↗
17. H. Leutwyler · Helv. Phys. Acta · 1997 · 70 · 275
18. 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/01110.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/011 ↗
19. 10.1007/JHEP06(2015)15510.1007/JHEP06(2015)155 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.10500910.1103/PhysRevD.102.105009 ↗
21. 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.01500310.1103/RevModPhys.89.015003 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.18430210.1103/PhysRevB.101.184302 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.11660210.1103/PhysRevLett.131.116602 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.adl120310.1126/science.adl1203 ↗
25. 10.1088/0953-8984/12/9/20110.1088/0953-8984/12/9/201 ↗
26. D. Vanderbilt · 201810.1017/9781316662205 ↗
27. 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.195910.1103/RevModPhys.82.1959 ↗
28. B. A. Bernevig · 201310.1515/9781400846733 ↗
29. 10.1007/BF0219355910.1007/BF02193559 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.24000110.1103/PhysRevLett.131.240001 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevA.36.347910.1103/PhysRevA.36.3479 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.169710.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1697 ↗
33. 10.1098/rspa.1984.002310.1098/rspa.1984.0023 ↗
34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/jg8x-l6h6 for additional information on the QGT in crystals, proof of the acoustic sum rules, calculation of electronic force constants within the BOA, explicit formulas for the dynamical matrix, discussion of the analogy between phonon theory and linear response theory, proof of the TRK sum rule for a 1D toy model, isolation of nontrivial geometric terms via the GA, details on the application of the theory to graphene, and explicit analytical calculation of some terms in Dg(q) for massless Dirac fermions, which includes Refs. [1, 28, 29, 39, 60, 65, 67, 68, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82].
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.37010.1103/PhysRevLett.82.370 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.166610.1103/PhysRevB.62.1666 ↗
37. 10.1140/epjb/e2010-10874-410.1140/epjb/e2010-10874-4 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.12111110.1103/PhysRevB.99.121111 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L16111110.1103/PhysRevB.109.L161111 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L08110310.1103/PhysRevB.111.L081103 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.01105210.1103/PhysRevX.14.011052 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41467-024-48808-x10.1038/s41467-024-48808-x ↗
43. 10.1073/pnas.240583712210.1073/pnas.2405837122 ↗
44. 10.1038/ncomms994410.1038/ncomms9944 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.20111210.1103/PhysRevB.102.201112 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cossms.2021.10095210.1016/j.cossms.2021.100952 ↗
47. 10.1038/s42254-022-00466-y10.1038/s42254-022-00466-y ↗
48. 10.3254/ENFI25002310.3254/ENFI250023 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.22600110.1103/PhysRevLett.130.226001 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L24110210.1103/PhysRevB.107.L241102 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41567-021-01465-z10.1038/s41567-021-01465-z ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L03201610.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L032016 ↗
53. 10.1093/nsr/nwz19310.1093/nsr/nwz193 ↗
54. 10.1088/0256-307X/39/10/10020210.1088/0256-307X/39/10/100202 ↗
55. 10.1038/s41586-020-1989-210.1038/s41586-020-1989-2 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41563-025-02180-310.1038/s41563-025-02180-3 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41567-024-02486-010.1038/s41567-024-02486-0 ↗
58. 10.1016/0003-4916(59)90002-810.1016/0003-4916(59)90002-8 ↗
59. 10.1016/0003-4916(59)90003-X10.1016/0003-4916(59)90003-X ↗
60. 10.1038/s41467-021-26030-310.1038/s41467-021-26030-3 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.1035510.1103/PhysRevB.55.10355 ↗
62. G. F. Giuliani · 200510.1017/CBO9780511619915 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.00310.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.003 ↗
64. J. J. Sakurai · 201710.1017/9781108499996 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.12110910.1103/PhysRevB.100.121109 ↗
66. Throughout this work, we have taken the liberty to omit orbital and sublattice indices when referring to the projection matrix [Pn(k)]ναν′α′ and the Bloch eigenvectors [Un(k)]να. These indices have instead been written explicitly for the hopping matrix [t(R)]ναν′α′, the force-constant matrix [C]pνip′ν′j, and the DM [D]νiν′j. Other quantities defined in the following, such as the Bloch Hamiltonian h(k) and its derivatives fi(k) and Mij(k), trivially inherit their matrix structure from the hopping matrix t(R). Wherever the γ symbol appears in front of a matrix, e.g., γt(R), the product is intended to be element wise, i.e., [γt(R)]ναν′α′=[γ]ναν′α′[t(R)]ναν′α′ and [γ2t(R)]ναν′α′=([γ]ναν′α′)2[t(R)]ναν′α′. The same applies when t(R)↔h(k).
67. 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.03221810.1103/PhysRevA.108.032218 ↗
68. 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.51510.1103/RevModPhys.73.515 ↗
69. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/39550210.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
70. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f7910.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79 ↗
71. 10.1038/s41524-018-0127-210.1038/s41524-018-0127-2 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.04310.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.043 ↗
73. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
74. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
75. 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.361610.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗
76. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
77. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.07544810.1103/PhysRevB.96.075448 ↗
78. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.03541210.1103/PhysRevB.66.035412 ↗
79. M. I. Katsnelson · 202010.1017/9781108617567 ↗
80. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.07310310.1103/PhysRevB.76.073103 ↗
81. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.04543010.1103/PhysRevB.76.045430 ↗