Dissipation meets conformal interface in open quantum systems: How the relaxation rate is suppressed
Source abstract
Abstract
Conformal interfaces play an important role in quantum critical systems. In closed systems, the transmission properties of conformal interfaces are typically characterized by two quantities: One is the effective central charge $c_{\text{eff}}$, which measures the amount of quantum entanglement through the interface, and the other is the transmission coefficient $c_{\text{LR}}$, which measures the energy transmission through the interface. In the present work, to characterize the transmission property of conformal interfaces in open quantum systems, we propose a third quantity $c_{\text{relax}}$, which is defined through the ratio of Liouvillian gaps with and without an interface. Physically, $c_{\text{relax}}$ measures the suppression of the relaxation rate towards a steady state when the system is subject to a local dissipation. We perform both analytical perturbation calculations and exact numerical calculations based on a free fermion chain at the critical point. It is found that $c_{\text{relax}}$ decreases monotonically with the strength of the interface. In particular, $0\le c_{\text{relax}}\le c_{\text{LR}}\le c_{\text{eff}}$, where the equalities hold if and only if the interface is totally reflective or totally transmissive. Our result for $c_{\text{relax}}$ is universal in the sense that $c_{\text{relax}}$ is independent of (i) the dissipation strength in the weak dissipation regime and (ii) the location where the local dissipation is introduced. Comparing to the previously known $c_{\text{LR}}$ and $c_{\text{eff}}$ in a closed system, our $c_{\text{relax}}$ shows a distinct behavior as a function of the interface strength, suggesting its novelty to characterize conformal interfaces in open systems and offering insights into critical systems under dissipation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Mechanical and Optical Resonators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology
Funding
Georgia Institute of Technology
References (95)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRev.109.149210.1103/PhysRev.109.1492 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.67310.1103/PhysRevLett.42.673 ↗
3. 10.1143/PTP.32.3710.1143/PTP.32.37 ↗
4. 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.135510.1103/RevModPhys.80.1355 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.aop.2005.11.01410.1016/j.aop.2005.11.014 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.15511110.1103/PhysRevB.75.155111 ↗
7. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-01472610.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014726 ↗
8. 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.02100110.1103/RevModPhys.91.021001 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.104610.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1046 ↗
10. 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90479-010.1016/0550-3213(94)90479-0 ↗
11. I. Affleck · Acta Phys. Pol. B · 1995 · 26 · 1869
12. 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00219-810.1016/S0550-3213(97)00219-8 ↗
13. 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/02710.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/027 ↗
14. 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/02810.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/028 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.07060110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.070601 ↗
16. 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/04/09510.1088/1126-6708/2007/04/095 ↗
17. 10.1007/JHEP04(2016)09110.1007/JHEP04(2016)091 ↗
18. 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/00110.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/001 ↗
19. 10.1007/JHEP12(2012)10310.1007/JHEP12(2012)103 ↗
20. 10.1088/1751-8113/47/48/48540110.1088/1751-8113/47/48/485401 ↗
21. 10.1088/1751-8113/49/19/19540110.1088/1751-8113/49/19/195401 ↗
22. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.3.2.01110.21468/SciPostPhys.3.2.011 ↗
23. 10.1007/JHEP05(2021)17810.1007/JHEP05(2021)178 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.02160310.1103/PhysRevLett.128.021603 ↗
25. 10.1007/JHEP10(2020)16610.1007/JHEP10(2020)166 ↗
26. 10.1007/JHEP12(2020)02510.1007/JHEP12(2020)025 ↗
27. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.3.07510.21468/SciPostPhys.13.3.075 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.07510810.1103/PhysRevB.92.075108 ↗
29. 10.1007/JHEP08(2016)07710.1007/JHEP08(2016)077 ↗
30. 10.1007/JHEP12(2022)12410.1007/JHEP12(2022)124 ↗
31. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.1.02010.21468/SciPostPhys.17.1.020 ↗
32. 10.1007/JHEP02(2023)09510.1007/JHEP02(2023)095 ↗
33. 10.1007/JHEP07(2023)01410.1007/JHEP07(2023)014 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.02102610.1103/PhysRevX.13.021026 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.24513210.1103/PhysRevB.107.245132 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.16512010.1103/PhysRevB.108.165120 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.04104210.1103/PhysRevX.13.041042 ↗
38. 10.1007/JHEP12(2023)15710.1007/JHEP12(2023)157 ↗
39. 10.1007/JHEP03(2024)06010.1007/JHEP03(2024)060 ↗
40. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.03030710.1103/PRXQuantum.5.030307 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.09440410.1103/PhysRevB.110.094404 ↗
42. 10.1007/JHEP09(2025)16810.1007/JHEP09(2025)168 ↗
43. 10.1103/l4b7-h5cd10.1103/l4b7-h5cd ↗
44. 10.1007/JHEP02(2020)13810.1007/JHEP02(2020)138 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.23160210.1103/PhysRevLett.125.231602 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.02160110.1103/PhysRevLett.131.021601 ↗
47. 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/00110.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/001 ↗
48. 10.1002/andp.20100005510.1002/andp.201000055 ↗
49. 10.1209/0295-5075/99/2000110.1209/0295-5075/99/20001 ↗
50. 10.1088/1751-8113/45/10/10520610.1088/1751-8113/45/10/105206 ↗
51. 10.1007/JHEP09(2015)08010.1007/JHEP09(2015)080 ↗
52. 10.1088/1751-8121/aab56110.1088/1751-8121/aab561 ↗
53. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.4.07010.21468/SciPostPhys.14.4.070 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L04110410.1103/PhysRevB.109.L041104 ↗
55. 10.1007/JHEP11(2023)12610.1007/JHEP11(2023)126 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.09160410.1103/PhysRevLett.133.091604 ↗
57. 10.1088/1367-2630/10/4/04302610.1088/1367-2630/10/4/043026 ↗
58. 10.1088/1742-5468/2011/12/P1200810.1088/1742-5468/2011/12/P12008 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.20541010.1103/PhysRevB.90.205410 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.04214310.1103/PhysRevE.92.042143 ↗
61. 10.1088/1751-8113/48/37/37300110.1088/1751-8113/48/37/373001 ↗
62. 10.1093/ptep/ptaa13110.1093/ptep/ptaa131 ↗
63. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.5.11210.21468/SciPostPhys.14.5.112 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.07514010.1103/PhysRevB.104.075140 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.02440410.1103/PhysRevB.108.024404 ↗
66. 10.1088/1742-5468/2010/07/P0702010.1088/1742-5468/2010/07/P07020 ↗
67. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/2/02501610.1088/1367-2630/12/2/025016 ↗
68. There are other free lattice systems that have these two nice properties, such as the critical Ising model [12] and harmonic chain [71], which deserve future studies.
69. 10.1088/1751-8113/45/15/15530110.1088/1751-8113/45/15/155301 ↗
70. 10.1088/1751-8113/41/39/39530310.1088/1751-8113/41/39/395303 ↗
71. H.-P. Breuer · 2002
72. 10.1063/1.511532310.1063/1.5115323 ↗
73. 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.01210810.1103/PhysRevA.87.012108 ↗
74. 10.1088/1742-5468/ac8e5c10.1088/1742-5468/ac8e5c ↗
75. 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.09431510.1103/PhysRevB.110.094315 ↗
76. Here, we have 8N maps instead of 4N because the original complex fermion chain is of length L=2N instead of N.
77. 10.1142/S0129055X1250001810.1142/S0129055X12500018 ↗
78. 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.02211810.1103/PhysRevA.89.022118 ↗
79. We want to point out that there were recent examples where the Liouvillian gap does not determine the relaxation time, due to the diffusive transports in the dissipated many-body quantum system [82].
80. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.23060410.1103/PhysRevLett.125.230604 ↗
81. 10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.8.1.01110.21468/SciPostPhysCore.8.1.011 ↗
82. We want to point out that the case of 2N+1mod3=0 differs from the case of 2N+1mod3≠0 in hosting oscillatory coherence, i.e., time-dependent modes that never decay. Here, we are only interested in the relaxation rate of the decay modes.
83. Here, θk can have complex values.
84. For the Liouvillian gap, g=−2maxIm[Ei]≠0{Im[Ei]}, where Ei values are the eigenvalues of Z. The effective Hamiltonian matrix is related to the matrix Z as Z=12Heff [see Eq. (31)]. Hence, the Liouvillian gap is g=−max{Eimag}.
85. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L16110710.1103/PhysRevB.109.L161107 ↗
86. 10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.7.2.02110.21468/SciPostPhysCore.7.2.021 ↗
87. 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.16512110.1103/PhysRevB.111.165121 ↗
88. 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/05410.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/054 ↗
89. 10.1007/JHEP09(2021)17210.1007/JHEP09(2021)172 ↗
90. 10.1007/JHEP06(2023)14510.1007/JHEP06(2023)145 ↗
91. 10.1007/JHEP05(2024)14310.1007/JHEP05(2024)143 ↗
92. 10.1103/l2rx-t9dd10.1103/l2rx-t9dd ↗
93. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.01360610.1103/PhysRevA.86.013606 ↗
94. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L02030210.1103/PhysRevB.103.L020302 ↗
95. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.14430510.1103/PhysRevB.105.144305 ↗