Continuous topological phase transition between Z 2 topologically ordered phases
Source abstract
Abstract
Topological phase transitions beyond anyon condensation remain poorly understood. A notable example is the transition between the toric code (TC) and double semion (DS) phases, which has two distinct {Z}2 topological orders in (2+1) dimensions [ (2+1)D ]. Previous studies reveal that the transition between them can be either first order or via an intermediate phase, thus the existence of a direct continuous transition between them remains a long-standing problem. Motivated by the fact that both phases can arise from condensing distinct anyons in the {Z}4 topological order, we introduce a perturbed {Z}4 quantum double (QD) model to study the TC-DS transition. We confirm the existence of a continuous (2+1)D XY* transition between the TC and DS phases by mapping it to a two-coupled quantum Ising model. Importantly, using the condensation order parameters and the area law coefficients of the Wilson loops, we further reveal that {Z}4 anyons, fractionalized from the {Z}2 topological orders, become deconfined at the transition between {Z}2 topologically ordered phases. Our results open a path toward developing a theoretical framework for topological phase transitions beyond anyon condensation.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum many-body systems · Topological Materials and Phenomena · Quantum and electron transport phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Technical University of Munich
Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (MCQST)
Funding
Hightech Agenda Bayern Plus
References (87)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.155910.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1559 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.139510.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1395 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.149975410.1063/1.1499754 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-010.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.00510.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.04511010.1103/PhysRevB.71.045110 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.abi837810.1126/science.abi8378 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.abi879410.1126/science.abi8794 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41586-023-06934-410.1038/s41586-023-06934-4 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41567-024-02529-610.1038/s41567-024-02529-6 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.07060210.1103/PhysRevLett.98.070602 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.17640110.1103/PhysRevLett.122.176401 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.04100810.1103/PhysRevX.11.041008 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.15511910.1103/PhysRevB.104.155119 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.20513910.1103/PhysRevB.106.205139 ↗
16. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.2.05310.21468/SciPostPhys.17.2.053 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.08511410.1103/PhysRevB.82.085114 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.19510410.1103/PhysRevB.85.195104 ↗
19. 10.1038/ncomms928410.1038/ncomms9284 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.23511910.1103/PhysRevB.95.235119 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.15512710.1103/PhysRevB.96.155127 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.19512410.1103/PhysRevB.97.195124 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.13060310.1103/PhysRevLett.124.130603 ↗
24. 10.1038/s42005-020-00479-y10.1038/s42005-020-00479-y ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.04513110.1103/PhysRevB.104.045131 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.04101410.1103/PhysRevX.11.041014 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.16510310.1103/PhysRevB.109.165103 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.03511710.1103/PhysRevB.90.035117 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L14041210.1103/PhysRevB.103.L140412 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.14443710.1103/PhysRevB.103.144437 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.16511510.1103/PhysRevB.98.165115 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.04325610.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043256 ↗
33. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.01035310.1103/PRXQuantum.3.010353 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.03513310.1103/PhysRevB.94.035133 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.15512310.1103/PhysRevB.94.155123 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.03104110.1103/PhysRevX.9.031041 ↗
37. 10.1126/science.109180610.1126/science.1091806 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.14440710.1103/PhysRevB.70.144407 ↗
39. The Z4 QD model is also known called the Z4 toric code model. In this work, “TC” refers exclusively to the Z2 toric code model, and we avoid calling HQD the Z4 TC model to prevent confusion.
40. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/1bjs-mf2l for a review on the anyon condensation theory of the Z4 QD model, details of the duality transformation, additional numerical results, and an analysis of the critical exponents at the MCP based on the O(2) ϕ4 field theory, which includes Refs. [75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92].
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.18160110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.181601 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.04531610.1103/PhysRevB.79.045316 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.07.00310.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.07.003 ↗
44. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-033117-05415410.1146/annurev-conmatphys-033117-054154 ↗
45. Alternative, the phase transitions to the TC phase by condensing the flux m2 by considering the Hamiltonian HQD−hx∑eXe2 with hx>0.657.
46. The phase transition point can be determined by mapping the Hamiltonian HQD−hz∑eZe2 to the transverse-field Ising model HIsing=−∑〈i,j〉σizσjz−h∑iσix. This yields the critical point at hz=2/hcTFIM, where hcTFIM=3.044330(6) is the known critical value of the transverse-field Ising model [58].
47. Note that AvBpAvBp†=Av2 and AvBpAv†Bp=Bp2 are conserved quantities. Although the Hamiltonian used here differs from HDS′=−∑〈vp〉′(AvBp+Bp2+H.c.)−∑eWe in Ref. [35], they share the same ground state.
48. 10.1007/JHEP02(2015)17210.1007/JHEP02(2015)172 ↗
49. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-02102910.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-021029 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.physrep.2023.11.00210.1016/j.physrep.2023.11.002 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.20513910.1103/PhysRevB.99.205139 ↗
52. 10.1016/0370-2693(83)91171-110.1016/0370-2693(83)91171-1 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41534-025-01030-z10.1038/s41534-025-01030-z ↗
54. 10.1063/1.166553010.1063/1.1665530 ↗
55. 10.1103/RevModPhys.51.65910.1103/RevModPhys.51.659 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.09410110.1103/PhysRevB.102.094101 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevB.3.391810.1103/PhysRevB.3.3918 ↗
58. 10.1007/s10955-017-1737-710.1007/s10955-017-1737-7 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.14650310.1103/PhysRevLett.134.146503 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.21040110.1103/PhysRevLett.117.210401 ↗
61. 10.1143/JPSJ.65.89110.1143/JPSJ.65.891 ↗
62. 10.1143/JPSJ.66.304010.1143/JPSJ.66.3040 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.23514810.1103/PhysRevB.98.235148 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.24010.1103/PhysRevLett.28.240 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.12.00210.1016/j.physrep.2022.12.002 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.11510910.1103/PhysRevB.86.115109 ↗
67. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.2.01310.21468/SciPostPhys.14.2.013 ↗
68. 10.1007/BF0120631510.1007/BF01206315 ↗
69. M. Marcu · 1986
70. 10.1103/3lxj-dx7610.1103/3lxj-dx76 ↗
71. 10.5281/zenodo.1674884910.5281/zenodo.16748849 ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.08513010.1103/PhysRevB.105.085130 ↗
73. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.15513810.1103/PhysRevB.82.155138 ↗
74. 10.1063/1.493621610.1063/1.4936216 ↗
75. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.03351510.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033515 ↗
76. 10.12693/APhysPolA.121.110510.12693/APhysPolA.121.1105 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.16610.1016/j.physa.2018.08.166 ↗
78. 10.1002/pssb.20030171010.1002/pssb.200301710 ↗
79. 10.1002/pssb.20056243810.1002/pssb.200562438 ↗
80. 10.1103/PhysRevB.22.254210.1103/PhysRevB.22.2542 ↗
81. 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.06212410.1103/PhysRevE.103.062124 ↗
82. 10.1007/JHEP08(2016)03610.1007/JHEP08(2016)036 ↗
83. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.1.00110.21468/SciPostPhys.14.1.001 ↗
84. 10.1007/JHEP06(2020)14210.1007/JHEP06(2020)142 ↗
85. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.16513810.1103/PhysRevB.105.165138 ↗
86. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.03310910.1103/PhysRevB.79.033109 ↗
87. 10.1126/science.121220710.1126/science.1212207 ↗