Current-based metrology with two-terminal mesoscopic conductors
Source abstract
Abstract
The traditional approach to quantum parameter estimation focuses on the quantum state, deriving fundamental bounds on precision through the quantum Fisher information. In most experimental settings, however, performing arbitrary quantum measurements is highly unfeasible. In open quantum systems, an alternative approach to metrology involves the measurement of stochastic currents flowing from the system to its environment. However, the present understanding of current-based metrology is mostly limited to Markovian master equations. Considering a parameter estimation problem in a two-terminal mesoscopic conductor, we identify the key elements that determine estimation precision within the Landauer-Büttiker formalism. Crucially, this approach allows us to address arbitrary coupling and temperature regimes. Furthermore, we obtain analytical results for the precision in linear-response and zero-temperature regimes. For the specific parameter estimation task that we consider, we demonstrate that the boxcar transmission function is optimal for current-based metrology in all parameter regimes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Geneva
Lund University
University of Rochester
Trinity College Dublin
King's College London
Funding
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse · U.S. Department of Energy
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.3510.1038/nphoton.2011.35 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.12040510.1103/PhysRevLett.112.120405 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.03040310.1103/PhysRevLett.122.030403 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.08040210.1103/PhysRevLett.125.080402 ↗
5. 10.1088/2058-9565/ab6ce510.1088/2058-9565/ab6ce5 ↗
6. 10.22331/q-2021-04-28-44610.22331/q-2021-04-28-446 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.24080310.1103/PhysRevLett.130.240803 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.01080110.1103/PhysRevLett.134.010801 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41467-019-12290-710.1038/s41467-019-12290-7 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41534-021-00507-x10.1038/s41534-021-00507-x ↗
11. 10.1038/s41586-022-04435-410.1038/s41586-022-04435-4 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.07050210.1103/PhysRevLett.129.070502 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41567-023-02046-y10.1038/s41567-023-02046-y ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.01313810.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013138 ↗
15. 10.1142/S021974990900483910.1142/S0219749909004839 ↗
16. 10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/42400610.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424006 ↗
17. 10.1515/qmetro-2018-000210.1515/qmetro-2018-0002 ↗
18. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.02020110.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020201 ↗
19. 10.1088/1355-5111/8/6/00210.1088/1355-5111/8/6/002 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.04210510.1103/PhysRevA.64.042105 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.03210910.1103/PhysRevA.69.032109 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.09040110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.090401 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.05211910.1103/PhysRevA.84.052119 ↗
24. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/07300510.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073005 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.03211510.1103/PhysRevA.87.032115 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.05211010.1103/PhysRevA.89.052110 ↗
27. 10.1088/1751-8113/48/36/36530110.1088/1751-8113/48/36/365301 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.02210310.1103/PhysRevA.93.022103 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.04212110.1103/PhysRevA.93.042121 ↗
30. 10.1088/1367-2630/aa984010.1088/1367-2630/aa9840 ↗
31. 10.22331/q-2018-12-03-11010.22331/q-2018-12-03-110 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.02210210.1103/PhysRevA.99.022102 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.20050510.1103/PhysRevLett.125.200505 ↗
34. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.01035410.1103/PRXQuantum.3.010354 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.01261110.1103/PhysRevA.107.012611 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.03101210.1103/PhysRevX.13.031012 ↗
37. 10.22331/q-2023-04-06-97310.22331/q-2023-04-06-973 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.05080110.1103/PhysRevLett.132.050801 ↗
39. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.166510.1103/RevModPhys.81.1665 ↗
40. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/cpp5-5yw4 for detailed derivations of all the results in the manuscript, which also contains Refs. [42, 44].
41. S. M. Kay · 2013
42. In fact, Eq. (1) can also be derived from a saddle-point approximation of the charge characteristic function as τ→∞ (e.g., see Sec. V E of Ref. [18]), without any explicit Gaussian assumption. We thank Patrick P. Potts for pointing this out to us.
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.1248510.1103/PhysRevB.46.12485 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00123-410.1016/S0370-1573(99)00123-4 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.13060110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.130601 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.11542510.1103/PhysRevB.91.115425 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.04403810.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.044038 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.01430110.1103/PhysRevB.111.014301 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.04542410.1103/PhysRevB.104.045424 ↗
50. 10.1103/6nww-8wcp10.1103/6nww-8wcp ↗
51. 10.1038/s41467-019-08970-z10.1038/s41467-019-08970-z ↗
52. 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.01100610.1103/RevModPhys.95.011006 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.04309110.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043091 ↗
54. 10.1088/1367-2630/ab998310.1088/1367-2630/ab9983 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.05242610.1103/PhysRevA.104.052426 ↗
56. 10.1088/1367-2630/ad3f3d10.1088/1367-2630/ad3f3d ↗
57. 10.1103/hbrt-cn8q10.1103/hbrt-cn8q ↗
58. 10.1038/s41534-025-00981-710.1038/s41534-025-00981-7 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.08542510.1103/PhysRevB.98.085425 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.09060110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.090601 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.03302110.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033021 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.05060110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.050601 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.14060210.1103/PhysRevLett.128.140602 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.02315510.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023155 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevE.111.06410710.1103/PhysRevE.111.064107 ↗