journal article·2025-09-05

Isostructural α − γ phase transition in cerium from the perspective of metageneralized gradient approximations

Ashesh Giri, Chandra Shahi, Adrienn Ruzsinszky

Physical Review B· Volume 112· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Metageneralized gradient approximations (meta-GGAs) on the third rung of the functional hierarchy are gaining increasing relevance for electronic structures. Meta-GGAs are constructed from numerous ingredients including the orbital kinetic energy density that make them more flexible than generalized gradient approximations (GGAs) including the heavily used Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof GGA (PBE-GGA). Still, most meta-GGAs cope with the expected limitations of a semilocal density functional when band gaps or localization of electrons are needed. On the other hand, meta-GGAs are explicit functionals of the orbitals. This feature resembles hybrid density functionals with exact exchange. Efforts in recent years demonstrate that some meta-GGAs can rise beyond the accuracy of semilocal approximations when band gaps are computed. Cerium is an ideal test bed to challenge some recent meta-GGAs. Cerium shows an isostructural $\ensuremath{\alpha}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ phase transition with delocalized and localized $f$ electrons in each phase, respectively. The correlation of $f$ electron systems is hardly captured by semilocal approximations, but the recent Lebeda-Aschebrock-K\"ummel (LAK) meta-GGA with ultranonlocality steps out of the framework of conventional semilocal density functionals and delivers spectacular accuracy for the phase transition of cerium. LAK and further meta-GGAs inspired by the success of LAK can open a forefront of meta-GGAs for quantum materials with localized electrons.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-pressure geophysics and materials · Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Tulane University

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. D. C. Koskenmaki · 1978
2. 10.1088/1361-648X/ac6c6b10.1088/1361-648X/ac6c6b ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.124810.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1248 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.14640210.1103/PhysRevLett.109.146402 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.124410.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1244 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.03640210.1103/PhysRevLett.115.036402 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0240510.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02405 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.03308210.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033082 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.06380310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.063803 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.13640210.1103/PhysRevLett.133.136402 ↗
13. 10.1063/5.017377610.1063/5.0173776 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.08380310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.083803 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.11516110.1103/PhysRevB.98.115161 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.162135211410.1073/pnas.1621352114 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.09380310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.093803 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.15513310.1103/PhysRevB.111.155133 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.12110910.1103/PhysRevB.102.121109 ↗
20. 10.1103/RevModPhys.40.67710.1103/RevModPhys.40.677 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.04513210.1103/PhysRevB.93.045132 ↗
22. 10.1080/1478643980820657410.1080/14786439808206574 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.110610.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1106 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.12511310.1103/PhysRevB.89.125113 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.30.9.24410.1073/pnas.30.9.244 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.07515310.1103/PhysRevB.93.075153 ↗
28. 10.1016/0378-4363(85)90406-110.1016/0378-4363(85)90406-1 ↗
29. 10.1080/0895795021279910.1080/08957950212799 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.06570110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.065701 ↗
31. http://www.loni.org.
32. 10.5281/zenodo.1560369510.5281/zenodo.15603695 ↗