Isostructural α − γ phase transition in cerium from the perspective of metageneralized gradient approximations
Source abstract
Abstract
Metageneralized gradient approximations (meta-GGAs) on the third rung of the functional hierarchy are gaining increasing relevance for electronic structures. Meta-GGAs are constructed from numerous ingredients including the orbital kinetic energy density that make them more flexible than generalized gradient approximations (GGAs) including the heavily used Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof GGA (PBE-GGA). Still, most meta-GGAs cope with the expected limitations of a semilocal density functional when band gaps or localization of electrons are needed. On the other hand, meta-GGAs are explicit functionals of the orbitals. This feature resembles hybrid density functionals with exact exchange. Efforts in recent years demonstrate that some meta-GGAs can rise beyond the accuracy of semilocal approximations when band gaps are computed. Cerium is an ideal test bed to challenge some recent meta-GGAs. Cerium shows an isostructural $\ensuremath{\alpha}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ phase transition with delocalized and localized $f$ electrons in each phase, respectively. The correlation of $f$ electron systems is hardly captured by semilocal approximations, but the recent Lebeda-Aschebrock-K\"ummel (LAK) meta-GGA with ultranonlocality steps out of the framework of conventional semilocal density functionals and delivers spectacular accuracy for the phase transition of cerium. LAK and further meta-GGAs inspired by the success of LAK can open a forefront of meta-GGAs for quantum materials with localized electrons.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-pressure geophysics and materials · Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Tulane University
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. D. C. Koskenmaki · 1978
2. 10.1088/1361-648X/ac6c6b10.1088/1361-648X/ac6c6b ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.124810.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1248 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.14640210.1103/PhysRevLett.109.146402 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.124410.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1244 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.03640210.1103/PhysRevLett.115.036402 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0240510.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02405 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.03308210.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033082 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.06380310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.063803 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.13640210.1103/PhysRevLett.133.136402 ↗
13. 10.1063/5.017377610.1063/5.0173776 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.08380310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.083803 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.11516110.1103/PhysRevB.98.115161 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.162135211410.1073/pnas.1621352114 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.09380310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.093803 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.15513310.1103/PhysRevB.111.155133 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.12110910.1103/PhysRevB.102.121109 ↗
20. 10.1103/RevModPhys.40.67710.1103/RevModPhys.40.677 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.04513210.1103/PhysRevB.93.045132 ↗
22. 10.1080/1478643980820657410.1080/14786439808206574 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.110610.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1106 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.12511310.1103/PhysRevB.89.125113 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.30.9.24410.1073/pnas.30.9.244 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.07515310.1103/PhysRevB.93.075153 ↗
28. 10.1016/0378-4363(85)90406-110.1016/0378-4363(85)90406-1 ↗
29. 10.1080/0895795021279910.1080/08957950212799 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.06570110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.065701 ↗
31. http://www.loni.org.
32. 10.5281/zenodo.1560369510.5281/zenodo.15603695 ↗