journal article·2024-10-04

Non-Hermitian gauged reciprocity and symmetry

Jiecheng Lyu, Zihe Gao, Liang Feng, Li Ge

Physical Review B· Volume 110· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

The Lorentz reciprocity is a fundamental property in electromagnetism and well known to break down due to an external magnetic field. With a fictitious or imaginary vector potential, however, its behavior is largely unknown. Here we show that in systems with an imaginary vector potential and displaying the non-Hermitian skin effect, the Lorentz reciprocity is broken but still governed by a rigorous mathematical relation, which we term non-Hermitian gauged reciprocity. When mimicking an imaginary vector potential using just linear integrated photonic elements, however, the conditions that lead to the Lorentz reciprocity are still satisfied and hence the latter cannot be broken. Nevertheless, we show that the non-Hermitian gauged reciprocity can still be observed with a proper choice of inputs and outputs, alongside the Lorentz reciprocity. In addition, we also reveal another equal-amplitude response in the same system, which we attribute to a non-Hermitian gauged symmetry. Furthermore, we show that light propagation is not impinged by the non-Hermitian topological funnel effect, highlighting an underappreciated difference between coherently driven and nondriven systems. These findings are confirmed using a tight-binding model and full-wave simulations of coupled optical microring resonators, providing a valuable extension of the Lorentz reciprocity in the non-Hermitian domain.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Topological Materials and Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Pennsylvania

Auburn University

College of Staten Island

The Graduate Center, CUNY

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. R. E. Collin · 1960
2. L. D. Landau · 1960
3. H. A. Haus · 1984
4. M. Stumpf · 2018
5. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.27310.1038/nphoton.2008.273 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.120603810.1126/science.1206038 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.121438310.1126/science.1214383 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.04103610.1103/PhysRevX.5.041036 ↗
9. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.18510.1038/nphoton.2013.185 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41563-023-01635-910.1038/s41563-023-01635-9 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.57010.1103/PhysRevLett.77.570 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.865110.1103/PhysRevB.56.8651 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41566-017-0031-110.1038/s41566-017-0031-1 ↗
14. 10.1038/srep1337610.1038/srep13376 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aba899610.1126/science.aba8996 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41586-022-05339-z10.1038/s41586-022-05339-z ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.17040110.1103/PhysRevLett.123.170401 ↗
18. 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.304510.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045 ↗
19. 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.105710.1103/RevModPhys.83.1057 ↗
20. 10.1088/0034-4885/75/7/07650110.1088/0034-4885/75/7/076501 ↗
21. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.103710.1103/RevModPhys.87.1037 ↗
22. 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.108310.1103/RevModPhys.80.1083 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.07040210.1103/PhysRevLett.124.070402 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.25040210.1103/PhysRevLett.124.250402 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.08660110.1103/PhysRevLett.129.086601 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41586-022-04929-110.1038/s41586-022-04929-1 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41467-021-25716-y10.1038/s41467-021-25716-y ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.26380110.1103/PhysRevLett.130.263801 ↗
29. 10.1126/science.aaz872710.1126/science.aaz8727 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.10411110.1103/PhysRevB.108.104111 ↗
31. 10.1364/PRJ.5.000B2010.1364/PRJ.5.000B20 ↗
32. 10.1109/JQE.2004.83477310.1109/JQE.2004.834773 ↗
33. R. Bronson · 1974
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.01411110.1103/PhysRevB.103.014111 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.02381210.1103/PhysRevA.95.023812 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.09390110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.093901 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.120110.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1201 ↗