Toward quantitative low-energy ion scattering on CaSiO 3 from comparison to multiple-scattering-resolved dynamical binary collision approximation simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
We perform Low-energy Ion Scattering with He ions ranging in energy from 1 keV to 3 keV on {CaSiO}3 using a commercial electrostatic detector system and determine the charge fraction of scattered ions from comparison with binary collision approximation simulations. The simulations take composition changes due to surface cleaning Xe sputtering into account. Scattered He particles are separated in the simulation into single, dual, and multiple scattering trajectories. We find that the charge fraction of single and dual scattered He is about ten times higher than the one for multiple collisions. Our results show that the charge fraction of scattered He can be reliably extracted for different scattering regimes and that for a given He incidence energy, the entire scattered He spectrum can be modeled with only few constant parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Particle Detector Development and Performance · Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Nuclear Physics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
TU Wien
Center for Electrochemical Surface Technology
University of California
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
Universität Göttingen
Funding
Austrian Science Fund · Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0193510.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01935 ↗
2. 10.1016/0029-554X(78)90929-110.1016/0029-554X(78)90929-1 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0237589710.1007/BF02375897 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nimb.2006.12.17610.1016/j.nimb.2006.12.176 ↗
5. 10.1016/0168-583X(84)90055-710.1016/0168-583X(84)90055-7 ↗
6. 10.1016/0168-583X(86)90509-410.1016/0168-583X(86)90509-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2006.12.00210.1016/j.surfrep.2006.12.002 ↗
8. 10.1039/C6AY00765A10.1039/C6AY00765A ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.01010.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.10.01210.1016/j.cattod.2008.10.012 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nimb.2012.12.09410.1016/j.nimb.2012.12.094 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.11.02210.1016/j.nimb.2008.11.022 ↗
13. 10.1002/sia.631210.1002/sia.6312 ↗
14. 10.1063/5.002617110.1063/5.0026171 ↗
15. 10.1016/0039-6028(80)90081-310.1016/0039-6028(80)90081-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.susc.2018.08.00710.1016/j.susc.2018.08.007 ↗
17. 10.3847/PSJ/aca40210.3847/PSJ/aca402 ↗
18. A. Mutzke, R. Schneider, W. Eckstein, R. Dohmen, K. Schmid, U. von Toussaint, and G. Bandelow, SDTrimSP version 6.00, IPP-report (IPP 2019-02), Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, doi:10.17617/2.3026474.
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.15210.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.152 ↗
20. 10.1088/2053-1591/ace41c10.1088/2053-1591/ace41c ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.11.01910.1016/j.nimb.2010.11.019 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.10.05010.1016/j.nimb.2008.10.050 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.susc.2008.07.03010.1016/j.susc.2008.07.030 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.08511010.1103/PhysRevB.107.085110 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15879310.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158793 ↗
26. 10.1039/C3JA50292A10.1039/C3JA50292A ↗
27. 10.1116/1.511506510.1116/1.5115065 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.12710.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.127 ↗
29. 10.1016/0039-6028(93)90244-E10.1016/0039-6028(93)90244-E ↗
30. 10.1016/j.nimb.2014.11.03010.1016/j.nimb.2014.11.030 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.04280610.1103/PhysRevA.104.042806 ↗
32. 10.1038/s42005-019-0188-710.1038/s42005-019-0188-7 ↗
33. 10.1088/0953-8984/10/4/00410.1088/0953-8984/10/4/004 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nimb.2023.02.02910.1016/j.nimb.2023.02.029 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.R339910.1103/PhysRevA.51.R3399 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.62710.1103/PhysRevLett.14.627 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0168-583X(01)01207-110.1016/S0168-583X(01)01207-1 ↗
38. 10.1016/0168-583X(92)95535-Y10.1016/0168-583X(92)95535-Y ↗
39. 10.1016/j.susc.2019.12149110.1016/j.susc.2019.121491 ↗
40. 10.1186/s40562-015-0027-y10.1186/s40562-015-0027-y ↗
41. 10.1029/2018JA02548610.1029/2018JA025486 ↗
42. 10.1002/2016JE00512810.1002/2016JE005128 ↗
43. 10.3847/1538-4357/ab700810.3847/1538-4357/ab7008 ↗
44. M. Newville, R. Otten, A. Nelson, T. Stensitzki, A. Ingargiola, D. Allan, A. Fox, F. Carter, and M. Rawlik, LMFIT: Non-linear least-squares minimization and curve-fitting for Python (1.3.4), Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16175987.