journal article·2019-12-30

Tuning the magnetic anisotropy energy of atomic wires

Martin W. Prestel, Markus F. Ritter, Angelo Di Bernardo, Torsten Pietsch, Elke Scheer

Physical Review B· Volume 100· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

In this article we present the fabrication of freestanding thin-film nanobridges of Ir. We perform magnetoconductance (MC) measurements of atomic contacts and monoatomic chains of Ir, realized by the mechanically controlled break-junction method. We observe continuous changes of the MC on the field scale of several tesla, as observed earlier for atomic-size contacts of two other strong paramagnets, Pd and Pt. The amplitude and the shape of the MC depend on the orientation of the magnetic field as well as on subtle details of the atomic arrangement, as confirmed by stretching studies of the contacts. Both positive dominant MC and negative dominant MC occur and are attributed to collinear or noncollinear alignment of the magnetic moments of the electrodes, respectively. By careful manipulation of the chain geometry we are able to study the transition between these two cases, which is hallmarked by a complex MC behavior. For special arrangements the MC almost vanishes. Our findings are in agreement with recent calculations of the geometry dependence of the magnetic anisotropy energy and open a route to tailor the MC behavior as required for particular applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00633-610.1016/S0370-1573(02)00633-6 ↗
2. 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00201-310.1140/epjb/e2006-00201-3 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature0787810.1038/nature07878 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.13440210.1103/PhysRevB.81.134402 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.05443310.1103/PhysRevB.81.054433 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.14443410.1103/PhysRevB.68.144434 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.06040810.1103/PhysRevB.79.060408 ↗
8. 10.1098/rspa.1938.006610.1098/rspa.1938.0066 ↗
9. 10.1038/srep3687210.1038/srep36872 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71694-710.1016/S1369-7021(06)71694-7 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.01442310.1103/PhysRevB.78.014423 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.23720310.1103/PhysRevLett.91.237203 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.332310.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3323 ↗
14. 10.1021/cr980391o10.1021/cr980391o ↗
15. 10.1038/ncomms717210.1038/ncomms7172 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.14443110.1103/PhysRevB.94.144431 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.19340410.1103/PhysRevB.69.193404 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.21720110.1103/PhysRevLett.103.217201 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.19680410.1103/PhysRevLett.106.196804 ↗
20. R. Segers · Dissertation · 2002
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.2.388710.1103/PhysRevB.2.3887 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.22441810.1103/PhysRevB.72.224418 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.12543810.1103/PhysRevB.95.125438 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.24543110.1103/PhysRevB.88.245431 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.01660210.1103/PhysRevLett.114.016602 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.16140410.1103/PhysRevB.88.161404 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.2.88310.1103/PhysRevB.2.883 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.07680510.1103/PhysRevLett.91.076805 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.09442210.1103/PhysRevB.81.094422 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.18340110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.183401 ↗