journal article·2024-10-03

Mechanism for broadened linewidth in antiferromagnetic resonance

Yutian Wang, Jiang Xiao

Physical Review B· Volume 110· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

The linewidth of antiferromagnetic resonance (AFMR) is notably broader than that of ferromagnetic resonance (FMR), even when both systems share the same intrinsic Gilbert damping parameter. We found that this phenomenon is primarily attributed to an additional phase delay in the two magnetic sublattices of antiferromagnets caused by Gilbert damping. This phase delay introduces a dampinglike component to the originally dissipationless exchange torque, thereby enhancing the damping and broadening the linewidth. Additionally, two alternative explanations are presented: The transverse component of the exchange coupling decreases the AFMR frequency, thus increasing the damping rate, and the antiferromagnetic eigenmode demonstrates properties of a two-mode squeezed state, intrinsically linked to enhanced damping. These findings introduce a different AFM eigenstate under Gilbert damping, impacting magnetic dissipation in antiferromagnets and providing insights into the experimentally observed broadened AFMR linewidths.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Theoretical and Computational Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Surface Physics

Fudan University

Shanghai Research Center for Quantum Sciences

Hefei National Laboratory

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China · Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRev.73.15510.1103/PhysRev.73.155 ↗
2. 10.1038/158670a010.1038/158670a0 ↗
3. 10.1088/0034-4885/61/7/00110.1088/0034-4885/61/7/001 ↗
4. 2002
5. 2003
6. 2006
7. 10.1103/PhysRev.82.56510.1103/PhysRev.82.565 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRev.85.32910.1103/PhysRev.85.329 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRev.114.70510.1103/PhysRev.114.705 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRev.123.42510.1103/PhysRev.123.425 ↗
11. 10.1143/PTP.28.97110.1143/PTP.28.971 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRev.130.18310.1103/PhysRev.130.183 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.486246710.1063/1.4862467 ↗
14. 10.1038/nnano.2016.1810.1038/nnano.2016.18 ↗
15. 10.1002/pssr.20170002210.1002/pssr.201700022 ↗
16. 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.01500510.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41567-018-0051-x10.1038/s41567-018-0051-x ↗
18. 10.1038/s41567-018-0049-410.1038/s41567-018-0049-4 ↗
19. 10.1088/1361-6463/aa8dad10.1088/1361-6463/aa8dad ↗
20. 10.1038/s41578-021-00332-w10.1038/s41578-021-00332-w ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.11760110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.117601 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.22440310.1103/PhysRevB.66.224403 ↗
23. 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.137510.1103/RevModPhys.77.1375 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.05760110.1103/PhysRevLett.113.057601 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.06040210.1103/PhysRevB.101.060402 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.10441610.1103/PhysRevB.76.104416 ↗
27. L. Landau · 1992
28. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.83674010.1109/TMAG.2004.836740 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.11.266810.1103/PhysRevB.11.2668 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.06160310.1103/PhysRevA.64.061603 ↗
31. 10.1088/1367-2630/5/1/10410.1088/1367-2630/5/1/104 ↗
32. A. G. Gurevich · 1996
33. 10.1063/1.503665310.1063/1.5036653 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.18440210.1103/PhysRevB.98.184402 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.508979910.1063/1.5089799 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.17440710.1103/PhysRevB.100.174407 ↗
37. 10.1002/smsc.20200006210.1002/smsc.202000062 ↗
38. 10.1016/0022-3697(64)90062-910.1016/0022-3697(64)90062-9 ↗
39. 10.1063/5.014736810.1063/5.0147368 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.01303110.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013031 ↗
41. C. Gerry · 200410.1017/CBO9780511791239 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.02041110.1103/PhysRevB.96.020411 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.22442210.1103/PhysRevB.106.224422 ↗