Observation of signatures of subresolution defects in two-dimensional superconductors with a scanning SQUID
Source abstract
Abstract
The diamagnetic susceptibility of a superconductor is directly related to its superfluid density. Mutual inductance is a highly sensitive method for characterizing thin films, however, in traditional mutual inductance measurements, the measured response is a nontrivial average over the area of the mutual inductance coils, which are typically of millimeter size. Here we measure localized, isolated features in the diamagnetic susceptibility of Nb superconducting thin films with lithographically defined through holes, $\ensuremath{\delta}$-doped ${\mathrm{SrTiO}}3$, and the two-dimensional electron system at the interface between ${\mathrm{LaAlO}}3$ and ${\mathrm{SrTiO}}3$, using scanning superconducting quantum interference device susceptometry, with spatial resolution as fine as $0.7\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$. We show that these features can be modeled as locally suppressed superfluid density, with a single parameter that characterizes the strength of each feature. This method provides a systematic means of finding and quantifying submicron defects in two-dimensional superconductors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.175405610.1063/1.1754056 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature1906110.1038/nature19061 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature0230810.1038/nature02308 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.114600610.1126/science.1146006 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature0856610.1038/nature08566 ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat415310.1038/nmat4153 ↗
7. 10.1109/TASC.2016.251938810.1109/TASC.2016.2519388 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.9975710.1063/1.99757 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.919310.1103/PhysRevB.51.9193 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.293234110.1063/1.2932341 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.496198210.1063/1.4961982 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.21452110.1103/PhysRevB.83.214521 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.140693110.1063/1.1406931 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.17451610.1103/PhysRevB.94.174516 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.06050310.1103/PhysRevB.86.060503 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.10451110.1103/PhysRevB.68.104511 ↗
17. J. R. Clem · 1991
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.29110.1103/PhysRevLett.44.291 ↗
19. 10.1016/0038-1098(91)90297-910.1016/0038-1098(91)90297-9 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.121610.1103/PhysRevB.55.1216 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.586210.1103/PhysRevB.58.5862 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.21210.1103/PhysRevLett.10.212 ↗
23. 10.1016/0378-4363(82)90187-510.1016/0378-4363(82)90187-5 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.10205310.1063/1.102053 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.1466210.1103/PhysRevB.46.14662 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.36719310.1063/1.367193 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.22451810.1103/PhysRevB.85.224518 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.935510.1103/PhysRevB.50.9355 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.34254910.1063/1.342549 ↗
30. 10.1088/0953-2048/29/12/12400110.1088/0953-2048/29/12/124001 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.300096310.1063/1.3000963 ↗
32. 10.1038/nphys112710.1038/nphys1127 ↗
33. 10.1038/415887a10.1038/415887a ↗
34. 10.1107/S090904950402694910.1107/S0909049504026949 ↗
35. 10.1126/science.120236610.1126/science.1202366 ↗