journal article·2024-05-15Open access

Fine structure splitting cancellation in highly asymmetric InAs/InP droplet epitaxy quantum dots

N. R. S. van Venrooij, A. R. da Cruz, R. S. R. Gajjela, P. M. Koenraad, Craig E. Pryor, Michael E. Flatté

Physical Review B· Volume 109· Issue 20

Abstract

We find the fine structure splitting (FSS) of a single exciton, which splits its degenerate ground-state manifold into singlets, nearly vanishes in highly asymmetric quantum dots (QDs) due to the cancellation of splitting effects with markedly different origin. The dots simulated are those that emerge on top of etch pits through the droplet epitaxy growth process; these etch pit dots break square ({C}4v) spatial symmetry, which has been previously associated with small FSS. Configuration interaction calculations predict a vanishing FSS at a specific finite etch pit displacement from the center of the dot, for a structure far from square symmetry. We thus predict that highly asymmetric QDs may still display negligible FSS, providing avenues for high-fidelity generation of indistinguishable, polarization entangled photon pairs on demand. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices · Quantum Information and Cryptography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Iowa

Eindhoven University of Technology

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0444610.1038/nature04446 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.1634710.1103/PhysRevB.53.16347 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1664010.1103/PhysRevB.60.16640 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.19680310.1103/PhysRevLett.104.196803 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.13050110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.130501 ↗
6. 10.1088/2040-8986/aac4c410.1088/2040-8986/aac4c4 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.25740210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.257402 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.19531510.1103/PhysRevB.65.195315 ↗
9. C. Schneider · 2012
10. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.01401310.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.014013 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41563-019-0355-y10.1038/s41563-019-0355-y ↗
12. 10.3390/nano1101008510.3390/nano11010085 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0119710.1021/acsanm.2c01197 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.330397910.1063/1.3303979 ↗
15. 10.1088/1361-6528/ac659e10.1088/1361-6528/ac659e ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.19543010.1103/PhysRevB.92.195430 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1684010.1103/PhysRevB.62.16840 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.719010.1103/PhysRevB.57.7190 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.181910.1103/PhysRevB.60.1819 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.02.03010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.02.030 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.369010.1103/PhysRevB.42.3690 ↗
22. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/48/38910.1088/0953-8984/14/48/389 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.03530510.1103/PhysRevB.95.035305 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.1199210.1103/PhysRevB.41.11992 ↗
25. 10.1119/1.1449110.1119/1.14491 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.136815610.1063/1.1368156 ↗
27. 10.1006/spmi.1997.050410.1006/spmi.1997.0504 ↗
28. O. Madelung · 2002
29. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/12/12302410.1088/1367-2630/11/12/123024 ↗
30. G. Bir · 1974
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.R1336710.1103/PhysRevB.58.R13367 ↗
32. 10.1021/nl901000x10.1021/nl901000x ↗
33. 10.1016/s0022-0248(98)80083-310.1016/s0022-0248(98)80083-3 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.18720110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.187201 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.484310.1103/PhysRevB.54.4843 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.01302410.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013024 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.08540310.1103/PhysRevB.91.085403 ↗