Random insights into the complexity of two-dimensional tensor network calculations
Source abstract
Abstract
Projected entangled pair states (PEPS) offer memory-efficient representations of some quantum many-body states that obey an entanglement area law and are the basis for classical simulations of ground states in two-dimensional (2d) condensed matter systems. However, rigorous results show that exactly computing observables from a 2d PEPS state is generically a computationally hard problem. Yet approximation schemes for computing properties of 2d PEPS are regularly used, and empirically seen to succeed, for a large subclass of (``not too entangled'') condensed matter ground states. Adopting the philosophy of random matrix theory, in this work, we analyze the complexity of approximately contracting a 2d random PEPS by exploiting an analytic mapping to an effective replicated statistical mechanics model that permits a controlled analysis at a large bond dimension. Through this statistical-mechanics lens, we argue that (i) although approximately sampling wave-function amplitudes of random PEPS faces a computational-complexity phase transition above a critical bond dimension, and (ii) one can generically efficiently estimate the norm and correlation functions for any finite bond dimension. These results are supported numerically for various bond-dimension regimes. It is an important open question whether the above results for random PEPS apply more generally also to PEPS representing physically relevant ground states.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum many-body systems · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Perimeter Institute
University of Waterloo
Google Quantum AI
University of British Columbia
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy · Basic Energy Sciences · Alfred P. Sloan Foundation · National Science Foundation · Institut Périmètre de physique théorique · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Government of Canada · Canadian Institute for Advanced Research · Ministry of Colleges and Universities · Institut de Ciències Fotòniques
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.286310.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0209917810.1007/BF02099178 ↗
3. 10.1080/1478994080191236610.1080/14789940801912366 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.01210.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.14050610.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140506 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.01301010.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013010 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.14720310.1103/PhysRevLett.112.147203 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.04640210.1103/PhysRevLett.113.046402 ↗
9. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.3.4.03010.21468/SciPostPhys.3.4.030 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aam712710.1126/science.aam7127 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.19514110.1103/PhysRevB.100.195141 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.01720110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.017201 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.25060210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.250602 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-023-37587-610.1038/s41467-023-37587-6 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41524-020-00353-z10.1038/s41524-020-00353-z ↗
16. 10.1016/S0370-1573(97)00088-410.1016/S0370-1573(97)00088-4 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.13420310.1103/PhysRevB.100.134203 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.10430610.1103/PhysRevB.105.104306 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00023-021-01087-410.1007/s00023-021-01087-4 ↗
20. 10.1088/1751-8113/40/42/S0510.1088/1751-8113/40/42/S05 ↗
21. 10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/03301410.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033014 ↗
22. 10.22331/q-2020-09-11-31810.22331/q-2020-09-11-318 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.01430710.1103/PhysRevB.107.014307 ↗
24. 10.1007/JHEP11(2016)00910.1007/JHEP11(2016)009 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.06420210.1103/PhysRevB.102.064202 ↗
26. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.01035210.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010352 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.03101610.1103/PhysRevX.7.031016 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.02101410.1103/PhysRevX.8.021014 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.17420510.1103/PhysRevB.99.174205 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.03100910.1103/PhysRevX.9.031009 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.20513610.1103/PhysRevB.98.205136 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.10430210.1103/PhysRevB.101.104302 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.10430110.1103/PhysRevB.101.104301 ↗
34. A. C. Potter · 2022
35. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031720-03065810.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031720-030658 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.02102110.1103/PhysRevX.12.021021 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41586-019-1666-510.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 ↗
38. 10.1143/JPSJ.66.304010.1143/JPSJ.66.3040 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.12060110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.120601 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.09440310.1103/PhysRevB.80.094403 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.14790210.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147902 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.15511710.1103/PhysRevB.78.155117 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.17430710.1103/PhysRevB.109.174307 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.05232810.1103/PhysRevA.70.052328 ↗
45. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.03033410.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030334 ↗