journal article·2018-05-21Open access

Effect of phonon-bath dimensionality on the spectral tuning of single-photon emitters in the Purcell regime

Yannick Chassagneux, Adrien Jeantet, Théo Claude, Christophe Voisin

Physical Review B· Volume 97· Issue 20

Abstract

We develop a theoretical frame to investigate the spectral dependence of the brightness of a single-photon source made of a solid-state nanoemitter embedded in a high-quality factor microcavity. This study encompasses the cases of localized excitons embedded in a one-, two-, or three-dimensional matrix. The population evolution is calculated based on a spin-boson model, using the noninteracting blip approximation. We find that the spectral dependence of the single-photon source brightness (hereafter called spectral efficiency) can be expressed analytically through the free-space emission and absorption spectra of the emitter, the vacuum Rabi splitting, and the loss rates of the system. In other words, the free-space spectrum of the emitter encodes all the relevant information on the interaction between the exciton and the phonon bath to obtain the dynamics of the cavity-coupled system. We compute numerically the spectral efficiency for several types of localized emitters differing by the phonon bath dimensionality. In particular, in low-dimensional systems where this interaction is enhanced, a pronounced asymmetric energy exchange between the emitter and the cavity on the phonon sidebands yields a considerable extension of the tuning range of the source through phonon-assisted cavity feeding, possibly surpassing that of a purely resonant system.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Strong Light-Matter Interactions · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.190310.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1903 ↗
2. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/10300410.1088/1367-2630/11/10/103004 ↗
3. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.18610.1038/nphoton.2016.186 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.04101010.1103/PhysRevX.4.041010 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.111010.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1110 ↗
6. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.5210.1038/nphoton.2011.52 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.15740110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.157401 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.05740210.1103/PhysRevLett.113.057402 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.06740210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.067402 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.19531310.1103/PhysRevB.65.195313 ↗
11. G. Mahan · 200010.1007/978-1-4757-5714-9 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.23531110.1103/PhysRevB.65.235311 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevX.1.02100910.1103/PhysRevX.1.021009 ↗
14. 10.1038/nnano.2015.6010.1038/nnano.2015.60 ↗
15. 10.1038/nnano.2015.6710.1038/nnano.2015.67 ↗
16. 10.1038/nnano.2015.7510.1038/nnano.2015.75 ↗
17. 10.1038/nnano.2015.7910.1038/nnano.2015.79 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.475787610.1063/1.4757876 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.24740210.1103/PhysRevLett.116.247402 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0097310.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00973 ↗
21. 10.1103/RevModPhys.59.110.1103/RevModPhys.59.1 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0087610.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00876 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12274-014-0532-x10.1007/s12274-014-0532-x ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.35.143610.1103/PhysRevA.35.1436 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.03540410.1103/PhysRevB.95.035404 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.05383810.1103/PhysRevA.79.053838 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.24360210.1103/PhysRevLett.110.243602 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.24541910.1103/PhysRevB.81.245419 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-017-01777-w10.1038/s41467-017-01777-w ↗
30. 10.1038/3505100910.1038/35051009 ↗
31. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.22910.1038/nphoton.2009.229 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.19360110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.193601 ↗
33. 10.1038/nature0513110.1038/nature05131 ↗
34. 10.1038/nature0460210.1038/nature04602 ↗
35. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.18110.1038/nphoton.2012.181 ↗
36. C. Gardiner · 2004