journal article·2024-01-29

Holographic models of non-Fermi liquid metals revisited: An effective field theory approach

Dominic V. Else

Physical Review B· Volume 109· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Accessing the physics of strongly coupled metals in a controlled way is a challenging problem in theoretical condensed matter physics. In this paper, we revisit the possibility of understanding strongly coupled metals through a holographic duality with a weakly coupled gravitational theory in one higher dimension (i.e., a suitable generalization of the ``AdS/CFT duality''). Previous attempts at devising holographic models of strongly coupled metals have suffered from drawbacks; for example, many such models do not even seem to be able to describe a Fermi surface that satisfies Luttinger's theorem, which is ought to be a core requirement in any physically reasonable model of a metal. Here, we propose a radically different approach to constructing holographic models of strongly coupled metals. The idea is that for applications, it should be sufficient to construct a holographic dual of the effective field theory that controls the infrared physics of the metal. We invoke recent paper that has identified a precise criterion for such an effective field theory to be ``emergeable'' from a continuum ultraviolet (UV) theory at nonzero charge density (or its equivalent in lattice models, namely an incommensurate charge filling). We show that imposing this criterion leads to a holographic model of a strongly coupled metal with physically reasonable properties, including a Fermi surface satisfying Luttinger's theorem. We discuss a possible physical interpretation of our results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Canada ON N2J 0E7

Funding

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-01321010.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013210 ↗
2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.92.03100110.1103/RevModPhys.92.031001 ↗
3. 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.101510.1103/RevModPhys.79.1015 ↗
4. 10.1038/nphys89210.1038/nphys892 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.07680110.1103/PhysRevLett.124.076801 ↗
6. S. A. Hartnoll · 2018
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.11160110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.111601 ↗
8. 10.1007/JHEP08(2016)10610.1007/JHEP08(2016)106 ↗
9. 10.1155/2011/25902510.1155/2011/259025 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.06401810.1103/PhysRevD.60.064018 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.08600610.1103/PhysRevD.79.086006 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.06502910.1103/PhysRevD.83.065029 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.117496210.1126/science.1174962 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.12500210.1103/PhysRevD.83.125002 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.13440610.1103/PhysRevB.63.134406 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.03513510.1103/PhysRevB.94.035135 ↗
17. 10.1007/JHEP08(2010)07810.1007/JHEP08(2010)078 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.04600110.1103/PhysRevD.81.046001 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.03512110.1103/PhysRevB.85.035121 ↗
20. 10.1007/JHEP11(2010)15110.1007/JHEP11(2010)151 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.116510.1103/PhysRevB.14.1165 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.718310.1103/PhysRevB.48.7183 ↗
23. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-02553110.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025531 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRev.119.115310.1103/PhysRev.119.1153 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.337010.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3370 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.02100510.1103/PhysRevX.11.021005 ↗
27. 10.1088/0264-9381/29/19/19400410.1088/0264-9381/29/19/194004 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.02600110.1103/PhysRevD.84.026001 ↗
29. 10.1088/0264-9381/29/19/19400810.1088/0264-9381/29/19/194008 ↗
30. 10.1007/JHEP08(2011)09610.1007/JHEP08(2011)096 ↗
31. 10.1007/JHEP04(2012)08610.1007/JHEP04(2012)086 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.06600910.1103/PhysRevD.84.066009 ↗
33. 10.1088/0264-9381/29/19/19400110.1088/0264-9381/29/19/194001 ↗
34. 10.1103/RevModPhys.66.12910.1103/RevModPhys.66.129 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.03104310.1103/PhysRevX.11.031043 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.24511810.1103/PhysRevB.70.245118 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.198410.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1984 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.153510.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1535 ↗
39. 10.1209/epl/i2005-10046-x10.1209/epl/i2005-10046-x ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.20513210.1103/PhysRevB.104.205132 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.08660110.1103/PhysRevLett.127.086601 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.04510710.1103/PhysRevB.108.045107 ↗
43. 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a210.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2 ↗
44. 10.1007/JHEP05(2012)07110.1007/JHEP05(2012)071 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.08502010.1103/PhysRevD.75.085020 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.06601710.1103/PhysRevD.83.066017 ↗
47. 10.1007/JHEP06(2011)01210.1007/JHEP06(2011)012 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.11513210.1103/PhysRevB.100.115132 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.23511110.1103/PhysRevB.105.235111 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.23512910.1103/PhysRevB.103.235129 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.11515110.1103/PhysRevB.106.115151 ↗
52. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.5.11310.21468/SciPostPhys.14.5.113 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.01700210.1103/PhysRevLett.124.017002 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.06060110.1103/PhysRevLett.129.060601 ↗
55. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.5.10210.21468/SciPostPhys.13.5.102 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.01040410.1103/PhysRevLett.96.010404 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.10050310.1103/PhysRevLett.96.100503 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevX.2.01101210.1103/PhysRevX.2.011012 ↗
59. 10.1209/0295-5075/98/2000310.1209/0295-5075/98/20003 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.04512310.1103/PhysRevB.87.045123 ↗
61. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.3.08210.21468/SciPostPhys.15.3.082 ↗
62. 10.1007/JHEP11(2013)07410.1007/JHEP11(2013)074 ↗
63. 10.1007/JHEP01(2015)07310.1007/JHEP01(2015)073 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.18160210.1103/PhysRevLett.96.181602 ↗
65. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.3.04710.21468/SciPostPhys.8.3.047 ↗
66. 10.1007/JHEP02(2015)17210.1007/JHEP02(2015)172 ↗