journal article·2024-01-08Open access

Quasibound states in the continuum in photonic crystal based optomechanical microcavities

Cindy Péralle, Sushanth Kini Manjeshwar, Anastasiia Ciers, Witlef Wieczorek, Philippe Tassin

Physical Review B· Volume 109· Issue 3

Abstract

We present a detailed study of mechanically compliant, photonic crystal based microcavities featuring a quasibound state in the continuum. Such systems were recently predicted to reduce the optical loss in Fabry-P\'erot-type optomechanical cavities. However, they require two identical photonic crystal slabs facing each other, which poses a considerable challenge for experimental implementation. We investigate how such an ideal system can be simplified and still exhibit a quasibound state in the continuum. We find that a suspended photonic crystal slab facing a distributed Bragg reflector realizes an optomechanical system with a quasibound state in the continuum. In this system, the radiative cavity loss can be eliminated to the extent that the cavity loss is dominated by dissipative loss originating from material absorption only. These proposed optomechanical cavity designs are predicted to feature optical quality factors in excess of ${10}5$.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Photonic and Optical Devices · Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden

Department of Microtechnology and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden

Funding

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse · Vetenskapsrådet

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0206310.1038/nature02063 ↗
2. 10.1364/OPEX.13.00596110.1364/OPEX.13.005961 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.310726310.1063/1.3107263 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.187401 ↗
5. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.4810.1038/natrevmats.2016.48 ↗
6. 10.1515/nanoph-2019-002410.1515/nanoph-2019-0024 ↗
7. 10.1002/adom.20200146910.1002/adom.202001469 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.physrep.2023.01.00110.1016/j.physrep.2023.01.001 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.16511110.1103/PhysRevB.89.165111 ↗
10. 10.1038/nature2079910.1038/nature20799 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0197510.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01975 ↗
12. 10.3390/s1708186110.3390/s17081861 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1104052610.3390/ma11040526 ↗
14. 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.139110.1103/RevModPhys.86.1391 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-022-30965-610.1038/s41467-022-30965-6 ↗
16. 10.1364/OE.27.01013810.1364/OE.27.010138 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.01313110.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013131 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.486203110.1063/1.4862031 ↗
19. 10.1038/nnano.2017.10110.1038/nnano.2017.101 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.aar693910.1126/science.aar6939 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41467-021-26102-410.1038/s41467-021-26102-4 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.06360110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.063601 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.06360210.1103/PhysRevLett.107.063602 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.365873110.1063/1.3658731 ↗
25. 10.1364/OL.40.00017410.1364/OL.40.000174 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.14720210.1103/PhysRevLett.116.147202 ↗
27. 10.1063/5.001266710.1063/5.0012667 ↗
28. 10.1002/lpor.20230000810.1002/lpor.202300008 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0099610.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00996 ↗
30. 10.1364/OE.26.02988610.1364/OE.26.029886 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.24360110.1103/PhysRevLett.122.243601 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0324010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03240 ↗
33. 10.1364/OPTICA.44643410.1364/OPTICA.446434 ↗
34. 10.1364/OE.48436910.1364/OE.484369 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.156373910.1063/1.1563739 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.199903110.1063/1.1999031 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.18390210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.183902 ↗
38. 10.1002/adom.20190038310.1002/adom.201900383 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.06380310.1103/PhysRevA.100.063803 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.12541410.1103/PhysRevB.106.125414 ↗
41. 10.1515/nanoph-2020-034610.1515/nanoph-2020-0346 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.25390110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.253901 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.243560810.1063/1.2435608 ↗
44. 10.1364/OE.17.00834310.1364/OE.17.008343 ↗
45. 10.1364/JOSAA.44021510.1364/JOSAA.440215 ↗
46. 10.1038/lsa.2013.4010.1038/lsa.2013.40 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41566-021-00860-510.1038/s41566-021-00860-5 ↗
48. 10.1364/OL.46556710.1364/OL.465567 ↗
49. A. Yariv · 1984
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.12510710.1103/PhysRevB.63.125107 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.10740110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.107401 ↗
52. 10.1364/AO.4.00127510.1364/AO.4.001275 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.physb.2012.01.11910.1016/j.physb.2012.01.119 ↗
54. 10.1088/1367-2630/aa849f10.1088/1367-2630/aa849f ↗
55. 10.1029/2007RS00362510.1029/2007RS003625 ↗
56. 10.1364/JOSAB.34.0000D110.1364/JOSAB.34.0000D1 ↗
57. 10.1088/2515-7647/aae8a210.1088/2515-7647/aae8a2 ↗
58. 10.1109/TGRS.2004.84141610.1109/TGRS.2004.841416 ↗
59. 10.1088/2399-6528/aa90c810.1088/2399-6528/aa90c8 ↗
60. 10.1038/nature1046110.1038/nature10461 ↗
61. 10.1038/nature0989810.1038/nature09898 ↗
62. 10.1038/s41467-019-12964-210.1038/s41467-019-12964-2 ↗
63. 10.1038/s42005-020-00501-310.1038/s42005-020-00501-3 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.03360110.1103/PhysRevLett.130.033601 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.03380410.1103/PhysRevA.77.033804 ↗
66. 10.1038/s41586-018-0643-810.1038/s41586-018-0643-8 ↗
67. 10.1515/nanoph-2021-025610.1515/nanoph-2021-0256 ↗
68. 10.1038/s41578-020-00260-110.1038/s41578-020-00260-1 ↗
69. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0096010.1021/acsphotonics.0c00960 ↗
70. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.08540810.1103/PhysRevB.106.085408 ↗