Optimality of Lindblad unfolding in measurement phase transitions
Source abstract
Abstract
Entanglement phase transitions in hybrid quantum circuits describe individual quantum trajectories rather than the measurement-averaged ensemble, despite the fact that results of measurements are not conventionally used for feedback. Here, we numerically demonstrate that a class of generalized measurements with identical measurement-averaged dynamics give different phases and phase transitions. We show that measurement-averaged destruction of Bell state entanglement is a useful proxy for determining which hybrid circuit yields the lowest-entanglement dynamics. We use this to argue that no unfolding of our model can avoid a volume law phase, which has implications for simulation of open quantum systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum many-body systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA
Funding
National Science Foundation · Welch Foundation
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.20513610.1103/PhysRevB.98.205136 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.13430610.1103/PhysRevB.100.134306 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.03100910.1103/PhysRevX.9.031009 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.10430210.1103/PhysRevB.101.104302 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.07060610.1103/PhysRevLett.125.070606 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.03050510.1103/PhysRevLett.125.030505 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.04102010.1103/PhysRevX.10.041020 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.18442210.1103/PhysRevB.104.184422 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.04100410.1103/PhysRevX.11.041004 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41567-020-01112-z10.1038/s41567-020-01112-z ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.10430610.1103/PhysRevB.103.104306 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.10430510.1103/PhysRevB.104.104305 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.17060210.1103/PhysRevLett.126.170602 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.17050310.1103/PhysRevLett.126.170503 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.02320010.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023200 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.01103010.1103/PhysRevX.11.011030 ↗
17. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.03031310.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030313 ↗
18. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.01035210.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010352 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.22421010.1103/PhysRevB.103.224210 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.10430110.1103/PhysRevB.101.104301 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.06231110.1103/PhysRevA.62.062311 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRev.129.234210.1103/PhysRev.129.2342 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRev.157.21310.1103/PhysRev.157.213 ↗
24. H. J. Carmichael · 199910.1007/978-3-662-03875-8 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.01430310.1103/PhysRevB.99.014303 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.01100610.1103/PhysRevX.9.011006 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.04040410.1103/PhysRevLett.122.040404 ↗
28. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.2.02410.21468/SciPostPhys.7.2.024 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.06430510.1103/PhysRevB.105.064305 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.06420410.1103/PhysRevB.100.064204 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.06030110.1103/PhysRevB.101.060301 ↗
32. 10.1038/nature1150510.1038/nature11505 ↗
33. 10.22331/q-2020-09-11-31810.22331/q-2020-09-11-318 ↗