journal article·2023-04-13

Optimality of Lindblad unfolding in measurement phase transitions

Michael Kolodrubetz

Physical Review B· Volume 107· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Entanglement phase transitions in hybrid quantum circuits describe individual quantum trajectories rather than the measurement-averaged ensemble, despite the fact that results of measurements are not conventionally used for feedback. Here, we numerically demonstrate that a class of generalized measurements with identical measurement-averaged dynamics give different phases and phase transitions. We show that measurement-averaged destruction of Bell state entanglement is a useful proxy for determining which hybrid circuit yields the lowest-entanglement dynamics. We use this to argue that no unfolding of our model can avoid a volume law phase, which has implications for simulation of open quantum systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum many-body systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation · Welch Foundation

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.20513610.1103/PhysRevB.98.205136 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.13430610.1103/PhysRevB.100.134306 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.03100910.1103/PhysRevX.9.031009 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.10430210.1103/PhysRevB.101.104302 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.07060610.1103/PhysRevLett.125.070606 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.03050510.1103/PhysRevLett.125.030505 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.04102010.1103/PhysRevX.10.041020 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.18442210.1103/PhysRevB.104.184422 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.04100410.1103/PhysRevX.11.041004 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41567-020-01112-z10.1038/s41567-020-01112-z ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.10430610.1103/PhysRevB.103.104306 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.10430510.1103/PhysRevB.104.104305 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.17060210.1103/PhysRevLett.126.170602 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.17050310.1103/PhysRevLett.126.170503 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.02320010.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023200 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.01103010.1103/PhysRevX.11.011030 ↗
17. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.03031310.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030313 ↗
18. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.01035210.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010352 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.22421010.1103/PhysRevB.103.224210 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.10430110.1103/PhysRevB.101.104301 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.06231110.1103/PhysRevA.62.062311 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRev.129.234210.1103/PhysRev.129.2342 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRev.157.21310.1103/PhysRev.157.213 ↗
24. H. J. Carmichael · 199910.1007/978-3-662-03875-8 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.01430310.1103/PhysRevB.99.014303 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.01100610.1103/PhysRevX.9.011006 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.04040410.1103/PhysRevLett.122.040404 ↗
28. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.2.02410.21468/SciPostPhys.7.2.024 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.06430510.1103/PhysRevB.105.064305 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.06420410.1103/PhysRevB.100.064204 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.06030110.1103/PhysRevB.101.060301 ↗
32. 10.1038/nature1150510.1038/nature11505 ↗
33. 10.22331/q-2020-09-11-31810.22331/q-2020-09-11-318 ↗