Precise measurement of angles between two magnetic moments and their configurational stability in single-molecule magnets
Source abstract
Abstract
A key parameter for the low-temperature magnetic coupling of in dinuclear lanthanide single-molecule magnets (SMMs) is the barrier ${U}FA$ resulting from the exchange and dipole interactions between the two $4f$ moments. Here we extend the pseudospin model previously used to describe the ground state of dinuclear endofullerenes to account for variations in the orientation of the single-ion anisotropy axes and apply it to the two SMMs ${\mathrm{Dy}}2\mathrm{ScN}$@${\mathrm{C}}80$ and ${\mathrm{Dy}}2\mathrm{TiC}$@${\mathrm{C}}80$. While x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) indicates the same ${J}z=15/2$ Dy ground state in both molecules, the Dy-Dy coupling strength and the stability of magnetization is distinct. We demonstrate that both the magnitude of the barrier ${U}FA$ and the angle between the two $4f$ moments are determined directly from precise temperature-dependent magnetization data to an accuracy better than ${1}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$. The experimentally found angles between the $4f$ moments are in excellent agreement with calculated angles between the quantization axes of the two Dy ions. Theory indicates a larger deviation of the orientation of the Dy magnetic moments from the Dy bond axes to the central ion in ${\mathrm{Dy}}2\mathrm{TiC}$@${\mathrm{C}}80$. This may explain the lower stability of the magnetization in ${\mathrm{Dy}}2\mathrm{TiC}$@${\mathrm{C}}80$, although it exhibits a $\ensuremath{\sim}49%$ stronger exchange coupling than in ${\mathrm{Dy}}2\mathrm{ScN}$@${\mathrm{C}}80$.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetism in coordination complexes · Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes · Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat213310.1038/nmat2133 ↗
2. 10.1038/3507102410.1038/35071024 ↗
3. D. Gatteschi · 200610.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567530.001.0001 ↗
4. 10.1038/365141a010.1038/365141a0 ↗
5. C. Benelli · 2018
6. 10.1021/ja029629n10.1021/ja029629n ↗
7. 10.1016/j.trechm.2019.04.00510.1016/j.trechm.2019.04.005 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8DT05153D10.1039/C8DT05153D ↗
9. 10.1039/C7CS00266A10.1039/C7CS00266A ↗
10. 10.1021/ja301044p10.1021/ja301044p ↗
11. 10.1002/chem.20190487910.1002/chem.201904879 ↗
12. 10.1021/jz401720610.1021/jz4017206 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.06040610.1103/PhysRevB.89.060406 ↗
14. 10.1039/C8CP01608A10.1039/C8CP01608A ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20167018010.1002/adma.201670180 ↗
16. 10.1038/ncomms1609810.1038/ncomms16098 ↗
17. 10.1021/ja206286h10.1021/ja206286h ↗
18. 10.1038/nchem.106310.1038/nchem.1063 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20190094310.1002/anie.201900943 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja205035g10.1021/ja205035g ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20150587010.1002/anie.201505870 ↗
22. J. Liu · 2014
23. 10.1063/1.489148510.1063/1.4891485 ↗
24. 10.1107/S090904951202784710.1107/S0909049512027847 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.346330710.1063/1.3463307 ↗
26. 10.1002/jcc.2105710.1002/jcc.21057 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
30. 10.1002/wcms.3010.1002/wcms.30 ↗
31. 10.1063/5.000483510.1063/5.0004835 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.473976310.1063/1.4739763 ↗
33. 10.1039/C8CC04736G10.1039/C8CC04736G ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.69410.1103/PhysRevLett.70.694 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.194310.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1943 ↗
36. 10.1039/C8NR05386C10.1039/C8NR05386C ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.01440410.1103/PhysRevB.103.014404 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.13442910.1103/PhysRevB.101.134429 ↗
39. 10.1039/C7SC02395B10.1039/C7SC02395B ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.23720210.1103/PhysRevLett.119.237202 ↗
41. 10.1039/C9CP00634F10.1039/C9CP00634F ↗
42. 10.1063/1.167652410.1063/1.1676524 ↗
43. 10.1039/c2dt31388j10.1039/c2dt31388j ↗