journal article·2026-01-09

MOF-Based Nanocatalysts for Methanation of Carbon Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide at Ambient Pressure

Saeideh Salimi, Kamran Akhbari, Ahmad Tavasoli

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 9· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Nowadays, finding catalysts that can perform the hydrogenation of CO 2 and CO with high efficiency and selectivity has become a research challenge. So, in this report, two types of porous carbon nanostructures of C UiO-66 and C UiO-66-NH2 with high surface area, which both were obtained from two types of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) of UiO-66 and UiO-66-NH 2 as precursors, were used in the CO 2 and CO hydrogenation after loading the active metal of nickel on their surface. The results of BET-N 2 and CO 2 adsorption showed higher surface area and adsorption capacity of the catalyst supports than those of their precursors. Also, the results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis indicated the presence of nitrogen-containing species such as pyridine in the structure of x Ni@C UiO-66-NH2 catalysts, which can act as basicity sites in sorption of CO 2 during the hydrogenation reaction, as was confirmed by results of CO 2 -temperature-programmed desorption. Among the catalyst samples with C UiO-66-NH2 and C UiO-66 supports, the 15Ni@C UiO-66-NH2 and 20Ni@C UiO-66 catalysts with conversion efficiencies of 87% and 74.5%, respectively, and a methane selectivity of 99% showed the best performance in CO 2 methanation at the temperature of 350 °C. The reason for the better performance of x Ni@C UiO-66-NH2 catalysts compared to x Ni@C UiO-66 catalysts is the presence of basic sites created by nitrogen heteroatoms in the C UiO-66-NH2 support. Also, the results of the tests of CO 2 methanation showed that catalysts based on supports with the carbon nanostructure obtained from MOFs showed a higher efficiency compared with the catalysts with the MOF supports. The 15Ni@C UiO-66-NH2 catalyst showed impressive performance in CO methanation with an efficiency of 100% and complete selectivity of methane at 275 °C. Finally, comparing the performance of 15Ni@C UiO-66-NH2 catalyst with other reported catalysts based on carbon supports or based on MOFs, showed the high potential of this catalyst in the process of CO 2 and CO methanation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalysts for Methane Reforming · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry, College of Science

University of Tehran

Funding

University of Tehran

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C8CS00829A10.1039/C8CS00829A ↗
2. 10.3389/fchem.2022.95622310.3389/fchem.2022.956223 ↗
3. 10.1039/D0EE01882A10.1039/D0EE01882A ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cjche.2022.02.01610.1016/j.cjche.2022.02.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.28510.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.285 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1002-0721(14)60462-210.1016/S1002-0721(14)60462-2 ↗
7. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0152010.1021/acscatal.5b01520 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.catcom.2015.08.00510.1016/j.catcom.2015.08.005 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c0062410.1021/acs.cgd.4c00624 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c0118310.1021/acs.cgd.1c01183 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c0034910.1021/acs.cgd.4c00349 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c0109410.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01094 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c0341410.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03414 ↗
14. 10.1039/c3dt32846e10.1039/c3dt32846e ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b0117410.1021/acs.cgd.9b01174 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.21564310.1016/j.ccr.2023.215643 ↗
17. 10.1002/chem.20230163010.1002/chem.202301630 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0486310.1021/acsomega.3c04863 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c0313810.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03138 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c0038010.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00380 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c0261610.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02616 ↗
22. 10.1039/D3NJ01395B10.1039/D3NJ01395B ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.cgd.3c0027210.1021/acs.cgd.3c00272 ↗
24. 10.1039/D4DT01201A10.1039/D4DT01201A ↗
25. 10.1039/C8CY02329H10.1039/C8CY02329H ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.06210.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.062 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.21343410.1016/j.ccr.2020.213434 ↗
28. 10.1039/C7QM00007C10.1039/C7QM00007C ↗
29. 10.1039/C6CE01076H10.1039/C6CE01076H ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ica.2015.07.02510.1016/j.ica.2015.07.025 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.02.01710.1016/j.jssc.2015.02.017 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.10165110.1016/j.jcou.2021.101651 ↗
33. 10.1039/C6CY00544F10.1039/C6CY00544F ↗
34. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0168110.1021/acsaem.8b01681 ↗
35. 10.1002/cssc.20160121710.1002/cssc.201601217 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.02.01910.1016/j.cattod.2013.02.019 ↗
37. 10.1002/anie.20150762910.1002/anie.201507629 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c0074310.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00743 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14333310.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143333 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.01910.1016/j.cej.2018.04.019 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.03.01510.1016/j.jcou.2018.03.015 ↗
42. 10.1039/C7TA02128C10.1039/C7TA02128C ↗
43. 10.1039/D2MA01037B10.1039/D2MA01037B ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11591910.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115919 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.13010.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.130 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.01310.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.013 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.22110.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.221 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.19710.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.197 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.09.00310.1016/j.jcou.2019.09.003 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.01510.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.015 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.09.07410.1016/j.cplett.2009.09.074 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.12886610.1016/j.fuel.2023.128866 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0114110.1021/acsomega.8b01141 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.12030810.1016/j.fuel.2021.120308 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jcou.2024.10288110.1016/j.jcou.2024.102881 ↗
56. 10.1039/C5CY00150A10.1039/C5CY00150A ↗
57. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15505510.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155055 ↗