journal article·2020-03-12Open access

Half-quantum vortex pair in the polar-distorted B phase of superfluid He3 in aerogels

Masaki Tange, Ryusuke Ikeda

Physical Review B· Volume 101· Issue 9

Abstract

Motivated by the recent observation and argument on a large half-quantum vortex (HQV) pair connencted by a Kibble wall in superfluid 3He in nematic aerogels, we numerically study to what extent a huge HQV pair can intrinsically occur with no pinning effect due to the aerogel structure in the polar-distorted B (PdB) phase of superfluid 3He. By fully examining the impurity-scattering induced pairing vertex, the emergence of Anderson's Theorem in the p-wave superfluid is verified in the two opposite limits, the isotropic and strongly anisotropic limits. Solving numerically the resulting Ginzburg-Landau (GL) free energy in the weak-coupling approximation and by taking account of the Fermi-liquid (FL) corrected gradient terms, the anisotropy dependence of the vortex structure minimizing the free energy is examined. It is found that, close to the transition between the polar and PdB phases, an interplay of the strong anisotropy and the FL correction makes emergence of a large HQV pair in the PdB phase possible, and that, nevertheless, such a large pair easily shrinks deep in the PdB phase, indicating that a pinning effect due to the aerogel structure is necessary in order to keep a large pair size there. The obtained result indicates the validity of the London limit for describing the vortex structure, and a consistency with the picture based on the NMR measurement is discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.25530110.1103/PhysRevLett.117.255301 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.06050410.1103/PhysRevB.73.060504 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.16530410.1103/PhysRevLett.115.165304 ↗
4. G. E. Volovik · JETP Lett. · 1976 · 24 · 561
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.118410.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1184 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.09452410.1103/PhysRevB.98.094524 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-018-08204-810.1038/s41467-018-08204-8 ↗
8. G. E. Volovik · JETP Lett. · 1990 · 52 · 358
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.23530110.1103/PhysRevLett.115.235301 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevD.26.43510.1103/PhysRevD.26.435 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.358310.1103/PhysRevB.36.3583 ↗
12. 10.1103/RevModPhys.59.53310.1103/RevModPhys.59.533 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.07530110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.075301 ↗
14. 10.1134/S002136401908003410.1134/S0021364019080034 ↗
15. 10.1134/S106377611811002X10.1134/S106377611811002X ↗
16. 10.1016/0022-3697(59)90036-810.1016/0022-3697(59)90036-8 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.10050210.1103/PhysRevB.101.100502 ↗
18. N. R. Werthamer · 1968
19. 10.7566/JPSJ.83.08460210.7566/JPSJ.83.084602 ↗
20. 10.1143/PTP.70.64710.1143/PTP.70.647 ↗
21. D. Volhardt · 2002
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.286110.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2861 ↗
23. 10.1134/S002136401923002410.1134/S0021364019230024 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.26810.1103/PhysRevLett.86.268 ↗
25. 10.1134/1.56822310.1134/1.568223 ↗