Causal versus local GW+EDMFT scheme and application to the triangular-lattice extended Hubbard model
Source abstract
Abstract
Using the triangular-lattice extended Hubbard model as a test system, we compare $GW+\mathrm{EDMFT}$ results for the recently proposed self-consistency scheme with causal auxiliary fields to those obtained from the standard implementation which identifies the impurity Green's functions with the corresponding local lattice Green's functions. Both for short- and long-ranged interactions we find similar results, but the causal scheme yields slightly stronger correlation effects at half-filling. We use the two implementations of $GW+\mathrm{EDMFT}$ to compute spectral functions and dynamically screened interactions in the parameter regime relevant for $1T\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{TaS}}2$. These simulations allow us to clarify if the sample used in a recent photoemission study [M. Ligges et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 166401 (2018)] was half-filled or hole doped.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics · Quantum and electron transport phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.40.67710.1103/RevModPhys.40.677 ↗
2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.103910.1103/RevModPhys.70.1039 ↗
3. 10.1088/0953-8984/11/42/20110.1088/0953-8984/11/42/201 ↗
4. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/38/38300110.1088/0953-8984/28/38/383001 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.16640110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.166401 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.22640110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.226401 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.19511410.1103/PhysRevB.90.195114 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.08512010.1103/PhysRevB.66.085120 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.08640210.1103/PhysRevLett.90.086402 ↗
10. F. Aryasetiawan · 2004
11. S. Biermann · 2005
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.19514610.1103/PhysRevB.104.195146 ↗
13. 10.1002/andp.1921369030410.1002/andp.19213690304 ↗
14. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1998)68:6%3C385::AID-QUA2%3E3.0.CO;2-R10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1998)68:6%3C385::AID-QUA2%3E3.0.CO;2-R ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.04380310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.043803 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-020-18040-410.1038/s41467-020-18040-4 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.16640110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.166401 ↗
18. J. W. Negele · 1988
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.12514910.1103/PhysRevB.87.125149 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRev.139.A79610.1103/PhysRev.139.A796 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.01319110.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013191 ↗
22. 10.1103/RevModPhys.68.1310.1103/RevModPhys.68.13 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.339110.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3391 ↗
24. 10.1088/0034-4885/61/3/00210.1088/0034-4885/61/3/002 ↗
25. 2011
26. 10.1103/PhysRev.118.141710.1103/PhysRev.118.1417 ↗
27. 10.1142/S021797929900043610.1142/S0217979299000436 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.15510710.1103/PhysRevB.74.155107 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.146401 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.03510910.1103/PhysRevB.105.035109 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0065509010.1007/BF00655090 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.20110610.1103/PhysRevB.94.201106 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.04104710.1103/PhysRevX.10.041047 ↗
34. 10.1038/ncomms1045310.1038/ncomms10453 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.03512210.1103/PhysRevB.84.035122 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.07514710.1103/PhysRevB.100.075147 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.10640410.1103/PhysRevLett.122.106404 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.24640210.1103/PhysRevLett.118.246402 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.23511710.1103/PhysRevB.100.235117 ↗
40. 10.1080/0001873750010139110.1080/00018737500101391 ↗
41. 10.1080/1364281790824535910.1080/13642817908245359 ↗
42. 10.1038/nmat231810.1038/nmat2318 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.04512810.1103/PhysRevB.91.045128 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-019-13557-910.1038/s41467-019-13557-9 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.32410.1103/PhysRevLett.62.324 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.3.7710.1103/PhysRevLett.3.77 ↗
47. 10.1098/rspa.1964.019010.1098/rspa.1964.0190 ↗
48. 10.1007/BF0131139710.1007/BF01311397 ↗