journal article·2021-08-10Open access

Penetration depth of Cooper pairs in the IrMn antiferromagnet

R. L. Seeger, G. Forestier, O. Gladii, M. Leiviskä, S. Auffret, I. Joumard, C. Gomez, M. Rubio-Roy, A. I. Buzdin, M. Houzet, V. Baltz

Physical Review B· Volume 104· Issue 5

Abstract

Suppression of superconductivity due to the proximity effect between a superconductor and a ferromagnet can be partially alleviated when a Cooper pair simultaneously samples different directions of the short-range exchange field. The superconductor's critical temperature, ${T}C$, is therefore expected to partially recover when the ferromagnet is in a multidomain state, as opposed to a single-domain state. Here, we discuss series of experiments performed with ferromagnet(Pt/Co)/spacer(IrMn and Pt)/superconductor(NbN) heterostructures. By tuning the various parameters in play, e.g., superconducting coherence length-to-thicknesses ratio, and domain sizes, we obtained up to 10% recovery of the superconducting critical temperature $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{T}C/{T}C$. This large-scale recovery made investigations possible. In particular, from the spacer thickness dependence of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{T}C/{T}C$, it was possible to deduce the characteristic length for Cooper pair penetration in an IrMn antiferromagnet. This information is crucial for electronic transport, and up to now has been difficult to access experimentally for antiferromagnets.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.93510.1103/RevModPhys.77.935 ↗
2. 10.1038/nphys324210.1038/nphys3242 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.205810.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2058 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.26700110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.267001 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.18050310.1103/PhysRevB.71.180503 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.09450410.1103/PhysRevB.74.094504 ↗
7. 10.1088/0953-2048/20/12/02210.1088/0953-2048/20/12/022 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.18450810.1103/PhysRevB.68.184508 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.05700210.1103/PhysRevLett.93.057002 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.21450710.1103/PhysRevB.74.214507 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.02451310.1103/PhysRevB.75.024513 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.01700410.1103/PhysRevLett.101.017004 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.01451910.1103/PhysRevB.87.014519 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat122210.1038/nmat1222 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.34471610.1063/1.344716 ↗
16. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/37/30510.1088/0953-8984/14/37/305 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.482489110.1063/1.4824891 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRev.142.11810.1103/PhysRev.142.118 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.03700510.1103/PhysRevLett.94.037005 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.11700510.1103/PhysRevLett.96.117005 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.01700410.1103/PhysRevLett.99.017004 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.14451710.1103/PhysRevB.68.144517 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.14050410.1103/PhysRevB.102.140504 ↗
24. 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.01500510.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005 ↗
25. 10.1038/nnano.2016.1810.1038/nnano.2016.18 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.50810.1103/PhysRevB.62.508 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.01440610.1103/PhysRevB.75.014406 ↗
28. 10.1016/0304-8853(93)90863-W10.1016/0304-8853(93)90863-W ↗
29. 10.1088/0034-4885/60/11/00210.1088/0034-4885/60/11/002 ↗
30. P. G. de Gennes · 1999
31. 10.1038/srep0241210.1038/srep02412 ↗
32. 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.04100110.1103/RevModPhys.90.041001 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20050054410.1002/adma.200500544 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.316851510.1063/1.3168515 ↗
35. 10.1038/nphys189110.1038/nphys1891 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.35848810.1063/1.358488 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.05240410.1103/PhysRevB.81.052404 ↗
38. A. I. Buzdin · Sov. Phys. JETP · 1988 · 67 · 576