Transient and Sharvin resistances of Luttinger liquids
Source abstract
Abstract
Although the intrinsic conductance of an interacting one-dimensional system is renormalized by the electron-electron correlations, it has been known for some time that this renormalization is washed out by the presence of the (noninteracting) electrodes to which the wire is connected. Here, we study the transient conductance of such a wire: a finite voltage bias is suddenly applied across the wire and we measure the current before it has enough time to reach its stationary value. These calculations allow us to extract the Sharvin (contact) resistance of Luttinger and Fermi liquids. In particular, we find that a perfect junction between a Fermi liquid electrode and a Luttinger liquid electrode is characterized by a contact resistance that consists of half the quantum of conductance in series with half the intrinsic resistance of an infinite Luttinger liquid. These results were obtained using two different methods: a dynamical Hartree-Fock approach and a self-consistent Boltzmann approach. Although these methods are formally approximate, we find a perfect match with the exact results of Luttinger/Fermi liquid theory.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Datta · 1997
2. 10.1080/1478643700823847210.1080/14786437008238472 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.84810.1103/PhysRevLett.60.848 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.112694010.1126/science.1126940 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.411410.1103/PhysRevLett.70.4114 ↗
6. T. Giamarchi · 2004
7. 10.1088/0022-3719/14/19/01010.1088/0022-3719/14/19/010 ↗
8. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3889(199811)7:4%3C225::AID-ANDP225%3E3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/(SICI)1521-3889(199811)7:4%3C225::AID-ANDP225%3E3.0.CO;2-L ↗
9. 10.1088/0034-4885/58/9/00210.1088/0034-4885/58/9/002 ↗
10. 10.1016/0167-5729(85)90010-X10.1016/0167-5729(85)90010-X ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.122010.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1220 ↗
12. 10.1016/0921-4526(93)90169-710.1016/0921-4526(93)90169-7 ↗
13. G. D. Mahan · 200010.1007/978-1-4757-5714-9 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.R1704010.1103/PhysRevB.52.R17040 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.R553910.1103/PhysRevB.52.R5539 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.552810.1103/PhysRevB.50.5528 ↗
17. 10.1209/0295-5075/84/6700110.1209/0295-5075/84/67001 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.15544210.1103/PhysRevB.81.155442 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.12540610.1103/PhysRevB.81.125406 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.physe.2015.08.03310.1016/j.physe.2015.08.033 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.19541410.1103/PhysRevB.92.195414 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.24511410.1103/PhysRevB.95.245114 ↗
23. 10.1038/nature1271310.1038/nature12713 ↗
24. 10.1038/nature1382110.1038/nature13821 ↗
25. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/09300710.1088/1367-2630/13/9/093007 ↗
26. 10.1038/nnano.2013.31210.1038/nnano.2013.312 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.20141310.1103/PhysRevB.89.201413 ↗
28. 10.1038/nphys406210.1038/nphys4062 ↗
29. 10.1021/nl071162x10.1021/nl071162x ↗
30. 10.1038/nnano.2008.6010.1038/nnano.2008.60 ↗
31. J. W. Negele · 1998
32. 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.09.00110.1016/j.physrep.2013.09.001 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.13450610.1103/PhysRevB.93.134506 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10825-016-0855-910.1007/s10825-016-0855-9 ↗
35. 10.1088/1367-2630/16/6/06306510.1088/1367-2630/16/6/063065 ↗
36. E. Hairer · 1993
37. 10.1142/S021797929100005510.1142/S0217979291000055 ↗
38. F. H. L. Essler · 200510.1017/CBO9780511534843 ↗
39. A. Kamenev · 201110.1017/CBO9781139003667 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.99010.1103/PhysRevLett.70.990 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.1176810.1103/PhysRevB.43.11768 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.15330510.1103/PhysRevB.81.153305 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.18530710.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185307 ↗
44. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-01454810.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014548 ↗