Magnetic hyperfine interactions on Cd sites of the rare-earth cadmium compoundsRCd(R=Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, and Er)
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper reports the investigation of the magnetic hyperfine field ${B}hf$ in a series of rare-earth ($R$) cadmium intermetallic compounds $R\mathrm{Cd}$ and ${\mathrm{GdCd}}2$ measured by perturbed angular correlation (PAC) spectroscopy using $111\mathrm{In}/111\mathrm{Cd}$ as probe nuclei at Cd sites as well as first-principles calculations of ${B}hf$ at Cd sites in the studied compounds. Vapor--solid state reaction of $R$ metals with Cd vapor and the $111\mathrm{In}$ radioisotope was found to be an appropriate route of doping rare-earth cadmium compounds with the PAC probe $111\mathrm{In}/111\mathrm{Cd}$. The observation that the hyperfine parameters depend on details of the sample preparation provides information on the phase preference of diffusing $111\mathrm{In}$ in the rare-earth cadmium phase system. The $111\mathrm{Cd}$ hyperfine field has been determined in the compounds $R\mathrm{Cd}$ for the $R$ constituents Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, and Er, in several cases as a function of temperature. For most $R$ constituents, the temperature dependence ${B}hf(T)$ of $111\mathrm{Cd}$:$R\mathrm{Cd}$ is consistent with ferromagnetic order of the compound. DyCd, however, presents a remarkable anomaly: a finite magnetic hyperfine field is observed only in the temperature interval 35 K $\ensuremath{\le} T \ensuremath{\le}$ 80 K which indicates a transition from ferromagnetic order to a spin arrangement where all $4f$-induced contributions to the magnetic hyperfine field at the Cd site cancel. First-principles calculation results for DyCd show that the ($\ensuremath{\pi}, \ensuremath{\pi}$, 0) antiferromagnetic configuration is energetically more favorable than the ferromagnetic. The approach used in the calculations to simulate the $R\mathrm{Cd}$ system successfully reproduces the experimental values of ${B}hf$ at Cd sites and shows that the main contribution to ${B}hf$ comes from the valence electron polarization. The de Gennes plot of the hyperfine field ${B}hf$ of $111\mathrm{Cd}$:$R\mathrm{Cd}$ vs the $4f$-spin projection $(g\ensuremath{-}1)J$ reflects a decrease of the strength of indirect $4f\ensuremath{-}4f$ exchange across the $R$ series. Possible mechanisms are discussed and the experimental results indicate that the indirect coupling is provided by the intra-atomic $4f\ensuremath{-}5d$ exchange and interatomic $5d\ensuremath{-}5d$ interaction between the spin-polarized $5d$ electrons of neighboring $R$ atoms. The ratio of the hyperfine fields of GdCd and ${\mathrm{GdCd}}2$ scales with the number of nearest Gd neighbors. In the paramagnetic phases of the $R\mathrm{Cd}$ compounds, the PAC spectra indicate the presence of a broad distribution of weak quadrupole interactions suggesting a perturbation of the cubic CsCl symmetry of the Cd site, most probably due to chemical disorder of the $R$ and Cd sublattices. A substantial interchange of $R$ and Cd atoms is also reflected in the temperature dependence of the linewidth of the magnetic hyperfine interaction in the magnetically ordered phase of $R\mathrm{Cd}$ and ${\mathrm{GdCd}}2$. Its critical increase towards the order temperature is evidence for a distribution of the order temperature with a width of about 10 K.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Nuclear physics research studies · Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. R. G. Barnes · 1979
2. I. Iandelli · 1979
3. 10.1088/0034-4885/42/8/00310.1088/0034-4885/42/8/003 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0235464410.1007/BF02354644 ↗
5. P. Morin · 1989
6. 10.1143/JPSJ.63.150810.1143/JPSJ.63.1508 ↗
7. 10.1016/0304-8853(94)01274-110.1016/0304-8853(94)01274-1 ↗
8. 10.1016/0304-8853(87)90445-810.1016/0304-8853(87)90445-8 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.37319010.1063/1.373190 ↗
10. S. I. Reiman · Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. · 1992 · 102 · 704
11. S. I. Reiman · Sov. Phys. JETP · 1992 · 75 · 378
12. 10.1063/1.479831110.1063/1.4798311 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10751-012-0758-510.1007/s10751-012-0758-5 ↗
14. 10.1016/0022-5088(68)90186-010.1016/0022-5088(68)90186-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/0022-5088(71)90153-610.1016/0022-5088(71)90153-6 ↗
16. 10.1016/0022-5088(77)90105-910.1016/0022-5088(77)90105-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.08.01310.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.08.013 ↗
18. 10.1143/JPSJ.23.50710.1143/JPSJ.23.507 ↗
19. 10.1143/JPSJ.57.95310.1143/JPSJ.57.953 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.168178810.1063/1.1681788 ↗
21. 10.1016/0304-8853(85)90173-810.1016/0304-8853(85)90173-8 ↗
22. 10.1016/0304-8853(84)90303-210.1016/0304-8853(84)90303-2 ↗
23. 10.1016/0304-8853(88)90183-710.1016/0304-8853(88)90183-7 ↗
24. 10.1016/0038-1098(85)90971-810.1016/0038-1098(85)90971-8 ↗
25. 10.1016/0304-8853(85)90323-310.1016/0304-8853(85)90323-3 ↗
26. 10.1016/0038-1098(84)90024-310.1016/0038-1098(84)90024-3 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRev.96.9910.1103/PhysRev.96.99 ↗
28. 10.1143/PTP.16.4510.1143/PTP.16.45 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRev.106.89310.1103/PhysRev.106.893 ↗
30. 10.1038/nmat367210.1038/nmat3672 ↗
31. H. Frauenfelder · 1964
32. 10.1088/0031-8949/2/1-2/01310.1088/0031-8949/2/1-2/013 ↗
33. 10.1143/JPSJ.64.340310.1143/JPSJ.64.3403 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10751-012-0689-110.1007/s10751-012-0689-1 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.479572910.1063/1.4795729 ↗
36. 10.1103/RevModPhys.51.16110.1103/RevModPhys.51.161 ↗
37. 10.1088/0305-4608/2/3/00410.1088/0305-4608/2/3/004 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.09440410.1103/PhysRevB.71.094404 ↗
39. 10.1016/0022-3697(63)90103-310.1016/0022-3697(63)90103-3 ↗
40. N. N. Delyagin · Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. · 1984 · 86 · 1016
41. N. N. Delyagin · Sov. Phys. JETP · 1984 · 59 · 592
42. N. N. Delyagin · Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. · 1989 · 96 · 1896
43. N. N. Delyagin · Sov. Phys. JETP · 1989 · 69 · 1070
44. 10.1063/1.166245610.1063/1.1662456 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
47. P. Blaha · 2001
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
49. 10.1073/pnas.30.9.24410.1073/pnas.30.9.244 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.04512110.1103/PhysRevB.75.045121 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.physb.2006.07.02710.1016/j.physb.2006.07.027 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ssc.2010.07.01210.1016/j.ssc.2010.07.012 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.16520610.1103/PhysRevB.88.165206 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.14040310.1103/PhysRevB.67.140403 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.05440510.1103/PhysRevB.65.054405 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.01440910.1103/PhysRevB.68.014409 ↗
57. 10.1071/P9704610.1071/P97046 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.118810.1103/PhysRevB.60.1188 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevB.26.499710.1103/PhysRevB.26.4997 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.2910.1103/PhysRevB.40.29 ↗
61. R. M. Suter · 1976
62. 10.1007/BF0240514610.1007/BF02405146 ↗