journal article·2023-05-10Open access

Framework for efficient ab initio electronic structure with Gaussian Process States

Yannic Rath, George H. Booth

Physical Review B· Volume 107· Issue 20

Abstract

We present a general framework for the efficient simulation of realistic fermionic systems with modern machine-learning-inspired representations of quantum many-body states, towards a universal tool for ab initio electronic structure. These machine-learning-inspired Ans\"atze have recently come to the fore in both a (first-quantized) continuum and discrete Fock space representations, where, however, the inherent scaling of the latter approach for realistic interactions has so far limited practical applications. With application to the ``Gaussian Process State,'' a recently introduced Ansatz inspired by systematically improvable kernel models in machine learning, we discuss different choices to define the representation of the computational Fock space. We show how local representations are particularly suited for stochastic sampling of expectation values, while also indicating a route to overcome the discrepancy in the scaling compared with continuum-formulated models. We are able to show competitive accuracy for systems with up to 64 electrons, including a simplified (yet fully ab initio) model of the Mott transition in three-dimensional hydrogen, indicating a significant improvement over similar approaches, even for moderate numbers of configurational samples.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum many-body systems · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.139510.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1395 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRev.108.117510.1103/PhysRev.108.1175 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.15910.1103/PhysRevLett.10.159 ↗
4. 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.29110.1103/RevModPhys.79.291 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.01310.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 ↗
6. F. Becca · 201710.1017/9781316417041 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.aag230210.1126/science.aag2302 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-018-07520-310.1038/s41467-018-07520-3 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.02102110.1103/PhysRevX.7.021021 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-017-00705-210.1038/s41467-017-00705-2 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.20515210.1103/PhysRevB.96.205152 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.17060110.1103/PhysRevLett.127.170601 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.01100610.1103/PhysRevX.8.011006 ↗
14. 10.1002/qute.20180007710.1002/qute.201800077 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRev.98.147910.1103/PhysRev.98.1479 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.03103410.1103/PhysRevX.11.031034 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.04102610.1103/PhysRevX.10.041026 ↗
18. 10.1063/5.002457010.1063/5.0024570 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.02312610.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.023126 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.482983510.1063/1.4829835 ↗
21. 10.1063/5.002505510.1063/5.0025055 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.504720710.1063/1.5047207 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b0078010.1021/acs.jctc.8b00780 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.234519610.1063/1.2345196 ↗
25. 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.3310.1103/RevModPhys.73.33 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.03342910.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033429 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41557-020-0544-y10.1038/s41557-020-0544-y ↗
28. L. Gerard · 2022
29. 10.1038/s41467-022-35627-110.1038/s41467-022-35627-1 ↗
30. I. von Glehn · 2023
31. 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.10892910.1016/j.jcp.2019.108929 ↗
32. N. Gao · 2022
33. N. Gao · 2023
34. P. Lopez Rios · Backflow and pairing wave function for quantum Monte Carlo methods · 2016
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.22640110.1103/PhysRevLett.122.226401 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.212205911910.1073/pnas.2122059119 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.06530110.1103/PhysRevLett.122.065301 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-020-15724-910.1038/s41467-020-15724-9 ↗
39. 10.1038/s42256-022-00461-z10.1038/s42256-022-00461-z ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b0113210.1021/acs.jctc.9b01132 ↗
41. 10.1002/1099-128x(200005/06)14:3%3C105::aid-cem582%3E3.0.co;2-i10.1002/1099-128x(200005/06)14:3%3C105::aid-cem582%3E3.0.co;2-i ↗
42. 10.1137/07070111X10.1137/07070111X ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.24511610.1103/PhysRevB.80.245116 ↗
44. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/8/08302610.1088/1367-2630/11/8/083026 ↗
45. R. M. Neal · Bayesian learning for neural networks · 1995
46. J. Lee · 2018
47. A. G. de G. Matthews · 2018
48. A. Szabo · 2012
49. 10.1002/wcms.112310.1002/wcms.1123 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.174763210.1063/1.1747632 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.44948610.1063/1.449486 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.236026410.1063/1.2360264 ↗
53. 10.1103/RevModPhys.32.30010.1103/RevModPhys.32.300 ↗
54. 10.1103/RevModPhys.35.45710.1103/RevModPhys.35.457 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.45658810.1063/1.456588 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.168168310.1063/1.1681683 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.490532910.1063/1.4905329 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.02451210.1103/PhysRevB.64.024512 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.softx.2019.10031110.1016/j.softx.2019.100311 ↗
60. 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.710.21468/scipostphyscodeb.7 ↗
61. 10.1002/wcms.134010.1002/wcms.1340 ↗
62. 10.1063/5.000607410.1063/5.0006074 ↗
63. A. Altland · 200610.1017/CBO9780511804236 ↗
64. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b0045010.1021/acs.jctc.8b00450 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.13020110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.130201 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.08.01410.1016/j.cpc.2018.08.014 ↗
67. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.03307510.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033075 ↗
68. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.6.14710.21468/SciPostPhys.10.6.147 ↗
69. 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.03105910.1103/PhysRevX.7.031059 ↗
70. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.24511710.1103/PhysRevB.84.245117 ↗
71. 10.1063/1.345905910.1063/1.3459059 ↗
72. 10.1063/1.323702910.1063/1.3237029 ↗
73. 10.1038/s41467-020-15402-w10.1038/s41467-020-15402-w ↗
74. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.04317810.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043178 ↗