journal article·2023-04-04Open access

Simulating superconducting properties of overdoped cuprates: The role of inhomogeneity

Mainak Pal, Andreas Kreisel, W. A. Atkinson, P. J. Hirschfeld

Physical Review B· Volume 107· Issue 14

Abstract

Theoretical studies of disordered $d$-wave superconductors have focused, with a few exceptions, on optimally doped models with strong scatterers. Addressing recent controversies about the nature of the overdoped cuprates, however, requires studies of the weaker scattering associated with dopant atoms. Here we study simple models of such systems in the self-consistent Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) framework, and compare to disorder-averaged results using the self-consistent $T$-matrix-approximation (SCTMA). Despite surprisingly linear in energy behavior of the low-energy density of states even for quite disordered systems, the superfluid density in such cases retains a quadratic low-temperature variation of the penetration depth, unlike other BdG results reported recently. We trace the discrepancy to smaller effective system size employed in that work. Overall, the SCTMA performs remarkably well, with the exception of highly disordered systems with strongly suppressed superfluid density. We explore this interesting region where gap inhomogeneity dominates measured superconducting properties, and compare with overdoped cuprates.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Superconducting Materials and Applications · Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1906110.1038/nature19061 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.02700310.1103/PhysRevLett.122.027003 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41535-021-00335-410.1038/s41535-021-00335-4 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.22050710.1103/PhysRevB.87.220507 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.421910.1103/PhysRevB.48.4219 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.02450110.1103/PhysRevB.96.024501 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.05450610.1103/PhysRevB.98.054506 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.01322810.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013228 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.18451010.1103/PhysRevB.106.184510 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.22451510.1103/PhysRevB.106.224515 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41563-023-01497-110.1038/s41563-023-01497-1 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.14050610.1103/PhysRevB.64.140506 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.01450410.1103/PhysRevB.105.014504 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.17700310.1103/PhysRevLett.95.177003 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.392210.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3922 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.02050510.1103/PhysRevB.63.020505 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.392610.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3926 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.598210.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5982 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.05450110.1103/PhysRevB.68.054501 ↗
20. 10.1038/nphys102610.1038/nphys1026 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:101383852358710.1023/A:1013838523587 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.02451010.1103/PhysRevB.75.024510 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.799510.1103/PhysRevB.47.7995 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1025010.1103/PhysRevB.50.10250 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRev.136.A150010.1103/PhysRev.136.A1500 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.17450310.1103/PhysRevB.98.174503 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.399910.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3999 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.1318410.1103/PhysRevB.48.13184 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.537010.1103/PhysRevB.43.5370 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.05451010.1103/PhysRevB.70.054510 ↗