Optical conductivity of the two-dimensional Hubbard model: Vertex corrections, emergent Galilean invariance, and the accuracy of the single-site dynamical mean field approximation
Source abstract
Abstract
We compute the frequency-dependent conductivity of the two-dimensional square lattice Hubbard model at zero temperature as a function of density to second order in the interaction strength, and compare the results to the predictions of single-site dynamical mean field theory computed at the same order. We find that despite the neglect of vertex corrections, the single-site dynamical mean field approximation produces semiquantitatively accurate results for most carrier concentrations, but fails qualitatively for the nearly empty or nearly filled band cases where the model exhibits an emergent Galilean invariance. The DMFT approximation also becomes qualitatively inaccurate very near half filling if nesting is important.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
Center for Computational Quantum Physics, Flatiron Institute, 162 5th Avenue, New York, New York 10010, USA
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy · Office of Science · Basic Energy Sciences
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.68.1310.1103/RevModPhys.68.13 ↗
2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.86510.1103/RevModPhys.78.865 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.20511210.1103/PhysRevB.77.205112 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.15510110.1103/PhysRevB.82.155101 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.04104110.1103/PhysRevX.5.041041 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.04101310.1103/PhysRevX.11.041013 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.23511510.1103/PhysRevB.94.235115 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.11514210.1103/PhysRevB.102.115142 ↗
9. D. Pines · 1999
10. John W. Negele · 1998
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.04514210.1103/PhysRevB.104.045142 ↗
12. 10.1080/00018730024338110.1080/000187300243381 ↗
13. G. D. Mahan · 1983
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.10451010.1103/PhysRevB.72.104510 ↗
15. A. A. Abrikosov · 1963
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.14050510.1103/PhysRevB.75.140505 ↗