Bentonite-Inorganic Nanoparticle Suspensions for High-Temperature Drilling Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
To address the challenges of insufficient high-temperature stability and poor filtration control in deep well drilling mud, this study introduces a synergistic nanocomposite approach by incorporating lithium magnesium silicate (LMS) and other inorganic nanoparticles as additives, rather than bentonite replacements. The effects of these nanoparticles on shear thinning, yield stress, and thixotropic behavior are analyzed using a Haake rheometer, a six-speed rotational viscometer, and a medium-pressure filtration apparatus, in conjunction with the rheological model. The results indicate that 2% BNT + 1% LMS composite suspension maintains a high yield stress (5.65 Pa) and low filtration loss (24.8 mL) even after aging at 120 °C, with an excellent Herschel–Bulkley model fit (R 2 = 0.9966, RMSE < 0.5 Pa), demonstrating outstanding thermal stability. Microscopic analysis reveals that LMS and BNT form a more compact “house-of-cards” structure through electrostatic interactions, reinforcing the spatial network strength of the suspension. This study provides theoretical support for the formulation of drilling mud in high-temperature and high-pressure environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CNPC, Tianjin Boxing Engineering Science & Technology Co. LTD
College of Petroleum Engineering
China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Ministry of Education (MOE) Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering
Northeast Petroleum University
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0415610.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04156 ↗
2. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2024.02.00810.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2024.02.008 ↗
3. Jinsheng S. · Xinjiang Oil Gas · 2023 · 19 · 1
4. Bloys B. · Oilfield Rev. · 1994 · 6 · 33
5. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0510810.1021/acsomega.0c05108 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0212910.1021/acsomega.1c02129 ↗
7. 10.1180/clm.2020.1010.1180/clm.2020.10 ↗
8. 10.1039/C4SM01717J10.1039/C4SM01717J ↗
9. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13627410.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136274 ↗
10. Yuanzhi Q. · Pet. Drill. Tech. · 2007 · 35 · 50
11. 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.06710.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.067 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.11872510.1016/j.molliq.2022.118725 ↗
13. 10.11648/j.nano.20150303.1210.11648/j.nano.20150303.12 ↗
14. 10.3390/en1004054010.3390/en10040540 ↗
15. Salih A. H. · 2016 · 184067
16. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0002310.1021/acsnano.2c00023 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0086610.1021/acsnano.2c00866 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.08910.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.089 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1876-3804(16)30084-210.1016/S1876-3804(16)30084-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13104910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131049 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.8b1141910.1021/acsami.8b11419 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2023.10271210.1016/j.geothermics.2023.102712 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.clay.2021.10620610.1016/j.clay.2021.106206 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.clay.2022.10659310.1016/j.clay.2022.106593 ↗
25. 10.1007/978-981-97-3530-3_4210.1007/978-981-97-3530-3_42 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.clay.2015.02.02310.1016/j.clay.2015.02.023 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.10954210.1016/j.petrol.2021.109542 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.02.00210.1016/j.foodres.2015.02.002 ↗
29. James K. M. · J. Soil Mech. Found. Div · 1960 · 86 · 1910.1061/JSFEAQ.0000271 ↗
30. 10.3390/gels910080510.3390/gels9100805 ↗