Accessing long timescales in the relaxation dynamics of spins coupled to a conduction-electron system using absorbing boundary conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
The relaxation time of a classical spin interacting with a large conduction-electron system is computed for a weak magnetic field, which initially drives the spin out of equilibrium. We trace the spin and the conduction-electron dynamics on a timescale which exceeds the characteristic electronic scale that is set by the inverse nearest-neighbor hopping by more than five orders of magnitude. This is achieved with a construction of absorbing boundary conditions, which employs a generalized Lindblad master-equation approach to couple the edge sites of the conduction-electron tight-binding model to an external bath. The failure of the standard Lindblad approach to absorbing boundaries is traced back to artificial excitations initially generated due to the coupling to the bath. This can be cured by introducing Lindblad parameter matrices and by fixing those matrices to perfectly suppress initial-state artifacts as well as reflections of physical excitations propagating to the system boundaries. Numerical results are presented and discussed for generic one-dimensional models of the electronic structure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.physrep.2008.07.00310.1016/j.physrep.2008.07.003 ↗
2. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/31/31520310.1088/0953-8984/20/31/315203 ↗
3. G. Bertotti · 2009
4. 10.1088/0953-8984/23/49/49320110.1088/0953-8984/23/49/493201 ↗
5. 10.1088/0953-8984/26/10/10320210.1088/0953-8984/26/10/103202 ↗
6. L. D. Landau · Phys. Z. Sowjetunion · 1935 · 8 · 153
7. T. Gilbert · Phys. Rev. · 1955 · 100 · 1243
8. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.83674010.1109/TMAG.2004.836740 ↗
9. S. V. Vonsovsky · Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. · 1946 · 16 · 981
10. 10.1103/PhysRev.81.44010.1103/PhysRev.81.440 ↗
11. S. V. Vonsovsky · Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. · 1953 · 24 · 419
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.06660310.1103/PhysRevLett.96.066603 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.05720410.1103/PhysRevLett.108.057204 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.370022010.1063/1.3700220 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.13440910.1103/PhysRevB.99.134409 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.72910.1103/PhysRevLett.75.729 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.21241110.1103/PhysRevB.65.212411 ↗
18. 10.1209/epl/i2003-00181-410.1209/epl/i2003-00181-4 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.06660310.1103/PhysRevLett.107.066603 ↗
20. 10.1143/JPSJ.81.08470110.1143/JPSJ.81.084701 ↗
21. 10.1088/1367-2630/17/11/11305810.1088/1367-2630/17/11/113058 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.12720110.1103/PhysRevLett.117.127201 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.22720310.1103/PhysRevLett.119.227203 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.19720210.1103/PhysRevLett.124.197202 ↗
25. X. Antoine · Commun. Comput. Phys. · 2008 · 4 · 729
26. 10.1063/1.151704210.1063/1.1517042 ↗
27. 10.1006/jcph.1994.115910.1006/jcph.1994.1159 ↗
28. 10.1088/0953-4075/43/6/06500410.1088/0953-4075/43/6/065004 ↗
29. 10.1007/BF0160849910.1007/BF01608499 ↗
30. 10.1088/0143-0807/33/4/80510.1088/0143-0807/33/4/805 ↗
31. H. Carmichael · 199310.1007/978-3-540-47620-7 ↗
32. H.-P. Breuer · 2010
33. 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.01210610.1103/PhysRevA.99.012106 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.08640310.1103/PhysRevLett.110.086403 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.354806510.1063/1.3548065 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.20720410.1103/PhysRevLett.93.207204 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.20720510.1103/PhysRevLett.93.207205 ↗
38. 10.1088/1742-5468/2009/02/P0203510.1088/1742-5468/2009/02/P02035 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.05210910.1103/PhysRevA.85.052109 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.172226210.1063/1.1722262 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.14441810.1103/PhysRevB.67.144418 ↗