Orbital magnetism in ensembles of gold nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
The last two decades have witnessed various experiments reporting very unusual magnetic properties of ensembles of gold nanoparticles surrounded by organic ligands, including ferromagnetic, paramagnetic, or (large) diamagnetic responses. These behaviors are at odds with the small diamagnetic response of macroscopic gold samples. Here we theoretically investigate the possibility that the observed unusual magnetism in capped gold nanoparticles is of orbital origin. Employing semiclassical techniques, we calculate the orbital component to the zero-field susceptibility of individual as well as ensembles of metallic nanoparticles. While the result for the orbital response of individual nanoparticles can exceed by orders of magnitude the bulk Landau susceptibility in absolute value, and can be either diamagnetic or paramagnetic depending on nanoparticle size, we show that the magnetic susceptibility of a noninteracting ensemble of nanoparticles with a smooth size distribution is always paramagnetic at low magnetic fields. In particular, we predict that the zero-field susceptibility follows a Curie-type law for small nanoparticle sizes and/or low temperatures. The calculated field-dependent magnetization of an ensemble of diluted nanoparticles is shown to be in good agreement with existing experiments that yielded a large paramagnetic response. The width of the size distribution of the nanoparticles is identified as a key element for the quantitative determination of the orbital response.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetism in coordination complexes · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1143/JPSJ.17.97510.1143/JPSJ.17.975 ↗
2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.58.53310.1103/RevModPhys.58.533 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.214110.1103/PhysRevLett.52.2141 ↗
4. 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.61110.1103/RevModPhys.65.611 ↗
5. 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.67710.1103/RevModPhys.65.677 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.08720410.1103/PhysRevLett.93.087204 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.17720310.1103/PhysRevLett.97.177203 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.274057710.1063/1.2740577 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20070125210.1002/adma.200701252 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl073129g10.1021/nl073129g ↗
11. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/17/17570110.1088/0957-4484/19/17/175701 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11051-008-9445-510.1007/s11051-008-9445-5 ↗
13. 10.1166/jnn.2009.187710.1166/jnn.2009.1877 ↗
14. 10.1039/b918602f10.1039/b918602f ↗
15. 10.1002/cphc.20110012110.1002/cphc.201100121 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0047210.1021/acsomega.7b00472 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00742-210.1016/S0375-9601(99)00742-2 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0921-4526(99)02928-210.1016/S0921-4526(99)02928-2 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.17441110.1103/PhysRevB.69.174411 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.11680110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.116801 ↗
21. Y. Yamamoto · Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 12 · 23
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.24720310.1103/PhysRevLett.109.247203 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.12720210.1103/PhysRevLett.111.127202 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.306080810.1063/1.3060808 ↗
25. 10.1039/c2nr30640a10.1039/c2nr30640a ↗
26. B. Donnio · 2017
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.05720610.1103/PhysRevLett.96.057206 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.10450310.1103/PhysRevB.91.104503 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.17444610.1103/PhysRevB.83.174446 ↗
30. 10.1002/cphc.20120039410.1002/cphc.201200394 ↗
31. N. Bohr · Ph.D. thesis · 1911
32. 10.1051/jphysrad:0192100201203610010.1051/jphysrad:01921002012036100 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0139721310.1007/BF01397213 ↗
34. L. D. Landau · 1985
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.64010.1103/PhysRevLett.67.640 ↗
36. 10.1142/S021798499300105310.1142/S0217984993001053 ↗
37. D. A. van Leeuwen · Ph.D. thesis · 1993
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.562210.1103/PhysRevB.58.5622 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.207410.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2074 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.357810.1103/PhysRevLett.67.3578 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.202010.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2020 ↗
42. 10.1016/0375-9601(83)90011-710.1016/0375-9601(83)90011-7 ↗
43. 10.1051/jphys:019890050018026950010.1051/jphys:0198900500180269500 ↗
44. Y. Imry · 1991
45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.8010.1103/PhysRevLett.66.80 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.8410.1103/PhysRevLett.66.84 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.8810.1103/PhysRevLett.66.88 ↗
48. 10.1209/0295-5075/22/3/00610.1209/0295-5075/22/3/006 ↗
49. 10.1126/science.117813910.1126/science.1178139 ↗
50. 10.1016/0921-4526(93)90161-X10.1016/0921-4526(93)90161-X ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1715110.1103/PhysRevB.50.17151 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.38310.1103/PhysRevLett.74.383 ↗
53. 10.1016/0370-1573(96)00010-510.1016/0370-1573(96)00010-5 ↗
54. 10.1209/epl/i1998-00197-210.1209/epl/i1998-00197-2 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.R521910.1103/PhysRevB.54.R5219 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.53167710.1063/1.531677 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.89510.1103/PhysRevLett.80.895 ↗
58. M. C. Gutzwiller · 199010.1007/978-1-4612-0983-6 ↗
59. M. Brack · 1997
60. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.12512510.1103/PhysRevB.86.125125 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.1095710.1103/PhysRevB.44.10957 ↗
62. R. Gréget · Ph.D. thesis · 2012
63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.11541010.1103/PhysRevB.72.115410 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.16542110.1103/PhysRevB.74.165421 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.1605010.1103/PhysRevB.53.16050 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.12540510.1103/PhysRevB.83.125405 ↗
67. 10.1063/1.166532810.1063/1.1665328 ↗
68. 10.1063/1.166559610.1063/1.1665596 ↗
69. 10.1098/rspa.1976.006210.1098/rspa.1976.0062 ↗
70. 10.1088/0305-4470/10/3/00910.1088/0305-4470/10/3/009 ↗
71. 10.1063/1.33910510.1063/1.339105 ↗
72. 10.1143/PTP.63.70710.1143/PTP.63.707 ↗
73. M. Mezard · 1987
74. K. A. Fischer · 199110.1017/CBO9780511628771 ↗