Fourier-like conduction and finite one-dimensional thermal conductivity in long silicon nanowires by approach-to-equilibrium molecular dynamics
Source abstract
Abstract
The thermal conductivity of cylindrical and smooth silicon nanowires is systematically studied as a function of diameter and length by fully atomistic simulations. A transient thermal regime is created and monitored by molecular dynamics. This approach-to-equilibrium methodology, already proven to be very efficient for bulk systems, is here applied to nanowires of length up to 1.2 micron, and diameter in the range 1 to 14 nm. It is shown that the temperature profile along the nanowire axis and its temporal evolution comply with the heat equation. A one-dimensional thermal conductivity is extracted from the characteristic decay time according to the time-dependent solution of the heat equation. Like for the bulk using the same method, the thermal conductivity exhibits a length dependence due to the slowly growing cumulative distribution of the phonon mean free paths. Unlike the bulk, the infinite-length saturation of the conductivity value can be observed in our simulations, thanks to a reduction of the phonon mean free path in the nanowires, estimated to be a few hundred nanometers. A finite thermal conductivity can be extracted for each diameter, and no divergence at long length is observed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.161698110.1063/1.1616981 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRev.134.A105810.1103/PhysRev.134.A1058 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.02.00210.1016/j.nantod.2010.02.002 ↗
4. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/15/15570410.1088/0957-4484/21/15/155704 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.08544210.1103/PhysRevB.84.085442 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.07590310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.075903 ↗
7. 10.1038/nnano.2013.12110.1038/nnano.2013.121 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.14430610.1103/PhysRevB.65.144306 ↗
9. 10.1166/jctn.2008.001a10.1166/jctn.2008.001a ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.21430510.1103/PhysRevB.81.214305 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.369832510.1063/1.3698325 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.481594510.1063/1.4815945 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.05430410.1103/PhysRevB.94.054304 ↗
14. 10.1021/nl025875l10.1021/nl025875l ↗
15. T. Ernst · 2008
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.990210.1103/PhysRevB.38.9902 ↗
17. 10.1039/b517931a10.1039/b517931a ↗
18. 10.1146/annurev.pc.16.100165.00043510.1146/annurev.pc.16.100165.000435 ↗
19. E. Lampin · 2017
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.526210.1103/PhysRevB.31.5262 ↗
21. 10.1021/nl062823d10.1021/nl062823d ↗
22. 10.1021/nl903268y10.1021/nl903268y ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.21590110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.215901 ↗
24. S. D. Suk · IEDM Tech. Dig. · 2007 · 2007 · 891
25. 10.1109/LED.2009.201497510.1109/LED.2009.2014975 ↗
26. T. Hiramoto · 2010
27. M. Koyama · 2013
28. 10.1021/nl060166j10.1021/nl060166j ↗
29. 10.1021/nl103278a10.1021/nl103278a ↗
30. 10.1063/1.134551510.1063/1.1345515 ↗