journal article·2016-07-27Open access

Electric control of inverted gap and hybridization gap in type-II InAs/GaSb quantum wells

Lun-Hui Hu, Chao-Xing Liu, Dong-Hui Xu, Fu-Chun Zhang, Yi Zhou

Physical Review B· Volume 94· Issue 4

Abstract

The quantum spin Hall effect has been predicted theoretically and observed experimentally in InAs/GaSb quantum wells as a result of inverted band structures, for which electron bands in InAs layers are below heavy-hole bands in GaSb layers in energy. The hybridization between electron bands and heavy-hole bands leads to a hybridization gap away from $k=0$. A recent puzzling observation in experiments is that when the system is tuned to more inverted regime by a gate voltage (a larger inverted gap at $k=0)$, the hybridization gap decreases. Motivated by this experiment, we explore the dependence of the hybridization gap as a function of external electric fields based on the eight-band Kane model. We identify two regimes when varying the electric fields: (1) Both inverted and hybridization gaps increase and (2) the inverted gap increases while the hybridization gap decreases. Based on the effective model, we find that light-hole bands in GaSb layers play an important role in determining the hybridization gap. In addition, a large external electric field can induce a strong Rashba splitting and also influence the hybridization gap.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Topological Materials and Phenomena · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.22680110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.226801 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.10680210.1103/PhysRevLett.96.106802 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.113373410.1126/science.1133734 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.114804710.1126/science.1148047 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.23660110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.236601 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.13660310.1103/PhysRevLett.107.136603 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.02660210.1103/PhysRevLett.112.026602 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.09680210.1103/PhysRevLett.114.096802 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.13680410.1103/PhysRevLett.115.136804 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.122236010.1126/science.1222360 ↗
11. R. A. Smith · 1978
12. 10.1016/0022-3697(57)90013-610.1016/0022-3697(57)90013-6 ↗
13. E. O. Kane · 1966
14. R. Winkler · 200310.1007/b13586 ↗
15. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/6/06501210.1088/1367-2630/12/6/065012 ↗
16. 10.1088/0953-8984/16/26/00310.1088/0953-8984/16/26/003 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.03533510.1103/PhysRevB.76.035335 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.90010.1103/PhysRevLett.77.900 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.03680310.1103/PhysRevLett.115.036803 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.08130310.1103/PhysRevB.92.081303 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.03532110.1103/PhysRevB.72.035321 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.14720110.1103/PhysRevLett.113.147201 ↗